He got us to the NCAA Tournament again. I'll take it. Good job. It's OK to take care of business against bad teams. That's part of it. We didn't do that last year and it cost us dearly.
2015-16 was his best year. 2019-20 a very close second. Then I'd go 2018-19 after he lost the 2018 Seniors and immediately got that team to beat Kentucky at MSG (best game I've attended), at Maryland, and dropped Marquette and Villanova before going to the BET title game again.
That 2019-20 team was humming until a tough final week. I think they would've done some damage in the NCAA Tournament though against unfamiliar opponents. They had a lot of great pieces for tournament play style.
I'd put this year ahead of 2016-17, both which required a comeback from a 3-6 start because this year lost our best offensive player at the time and that was a big adjustment.
Yep. Also the 3-6 start had a lot of quirky stuff going on. We played our first 5 BE games within 8 days because of BS COVID protocols, including not having a frontcourt for the first 2 games and played the best two teams. We had a no-show at DePaul which still drives me nuts, we had the BS at Marquette, lose our best offensive player. Not excuses, but was a strange start.
Willard can be measured against Willard now. He has set a bar and a standard here no doubt. Can he elevate it? Can we get to the next level? That's the competitive fire.
Seton Hall was VERY patient with him too; they gave him 4 seasons to learn on the job before they addressed some things (coaching staff) and let him then again work through that (2014-15). It paid off.
2015-16 was his best year. 2019-20 a very close second. Then I'd go 2018-19 after he lost the 2018 Seniors and immediately got that team to beat Kentucky at MSG (best game I've attended), at Maryland, and dropped Marquette and Villanova before going to the BET title game again.
That 2019-20 team was humming until a tough final week. I think they would've done some damage in the NCAA Tournament though against unfamiliar opponents. They had a lot of great pieces for tournament play style.
I'd put this year ahead of 2016-17, both which required a comeback from a 3-6 start because this year lost our best offensive player at the time and that was a big adjustment.
Seton Hall's turnaround has also been a partial product of the schedule lightening up. It was largely frontloaded this year - February and March to date has consisted of 5 games at home versus 4 on the road and 6 of those 9 games against teams in the bottom half of the league.
For a slightly above average team like Seton Hall, that translates into more wins.
Yep. Also the 3-6 start had a lot of quirky stuff going on. We played our first 5 BE games within 8 days because of BS COVID protocols, including not having a frontcourt for the first 2 games and played the best two teams. We had a no-show at DePaul which still drives me nuts, we had the BS at Marquette, lose our best offensive player. Not excuses, but was a strange start.
I don’t bar criticism of KW. I just think to ignore what he inherited and to measure his accomplishments over 12 years isn’t a good metric.
Willard can be measured against Willard now. He has set a bar and a standard here no doubt. Can he elevate it? Can we get to the next level? That's the competitive fire.
Seton Hall was VERY patient with him too; they gave him 4 seasons to learn on the job before they addressed some things (coaching staff) and let him then again work through that (2014-15). It paid off.