Not necessarily. Such logic can work like such:
"Global elites have no use for a strong, independent American middle class. It makes America -- long isolated by its continental size and two large oceans -- much harder to bring into alignment with the global power structure. One of the pillars (not the only one) of a strong, independent American middle class is economic independence brought about by its historical living standards.
The foundation of American prosperity since the Industrial Revolution is what is by far is the world's largest stockpile of carbon based energy (oil, gas, coal). By stigmatizing the consumption of carbon based energy, the natural economic advantage of the United States and its unique ability to sustain a large, prosperous middle class is negated. Further, the natural advantage that allowed America to dominate the two World Wars of the 20th century -- its ability to supply oil for itself and its allies -- is also negated.
The other powerful actors on the world stage -- Europe, China -- are massively short carbon based energy. By forcing everyone to "renewable energy" -- wind and solar are rather far more equally distributed globally -- the global balance of power tilts away from the United States back to where things were before oil became so crucial to global economic and military dominance."
Actually, while the narrative may or may not be true, it is hardly illogical.