ADVERTISEMENT

Here's the deal

It has been written many times over the years that , with rare exceptions, athletic departments run in the red. Even the highest earning schools spend $ like instagram "models" and for them football is like Methamphetamine. Football schools have been impacted greatly by NIL and if left unchecked it will not be sustainable for them or their supporters in the future.
BE schools , except UConn , have much smaller alumni numbers and is a disadvantage. But as a conference we have an advantage with BB that has 13 players and really only need to have 7 good or great ones.


I could be wrong but I think it's the state colleges who consistently run in the red. For the other Big East schools not counting Uconn, their MBB programs basically fund the other sports both directly & indirectly. Another advantage we have is the limited amount of other sports we offer. I would think that football & WCBB might also be a drain when it comes to rev. sharing/NIL at Uconn.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mbraue and Piratz
I could be wrong but I think it's the state colleges who consistently run in the red. For the other Big East schools not counting Uconn, their MBB programs basically fund the other sports both directly & indirectly. Another advantage we have is the limited amount of other sports we offer. I would think that football & WCBB might also be a drain when it comes to rev. sharing/NIL at Uconn.
They're actually different pools at Connecticut.

Jim Mora made a huge push last year to improve football NIL and has been successful. The quality of players were getting has jumped up. That was a major factor in our going 9-4 last year including a bowl win over North Carolina.

The woman's team operates in its own unique world. Paige Bueckers and Azzi Fudd combined made about $2 million in NIL, and none of that came from the school.

Neither of those are taking away money from the men's basketball program.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mbraue
They're actually different pools at Connecticut.

Jim Mora made a huge push last year to improve football NIL and has been successful. The quality of players were getting has jumped up. That was a major factor in our going 9-4 last year including a bowl win over North Carolina.

The woman's team operates in its own unique world. Paige Bueckers and Azzi Fudd combined made about $2 million in NIL, and none of that came from the school.

Neither of those are taking away money from the men's basketball program.
Was Paige’s NIL tbe traditional type that kids were supposed to be able to earn under the change in rules? I’d bet it was because of her brand appeal.
 
Was Paige’s NIL tbe traditional type that kids were supposed to be able to earn under the change in rules? I’d bet it was because of her brand appeal.
It was. In my view that is more legitimate NIL, because she actually brought more to the table than being a basketball player for a Connecticut.

She currently has deals with all of these companies:

  • Nike: Bueckers has a player edition Nike shoe, becoming the first NIL athlete to design and launch their own. She also has a deal with Nike for other apparel and footwear.

  • Gatorade: Bueckers was the first college athlete to sign a multi-year endorsement deal with Gatorade.

  • Verizon: Bueckers has a partnership with Verizon, which she's used to gift her teammates new iPhones.

  • Dunkin' Donuts: Bueckers is also part of the Dunkin' Donuts family.

  • Unrivaled: Bueckers has signed a three-year deal with Unrivaled, a new professional 3x3 women's basketball league. This deal includes equity in the league.

  • Ally Financial: Bueckers has also signed an endorsement deal with Ally Financial.

  • Chegg: She is also an ambassador for the educational platform Chegg.

  • StockX: Bueckers has a partnership with StockX, a platform for sneakers and other collectibles.
 
Last edited:
It was. In my view that is more legitimate than IL, because she actually brought more to the table than being a basketball player for a Connecticut.

She currently has deals with all of these companies:

  • Nike: Bueckers has a player edition Nike shoe, becoming the first NIL athlete to design and launch their own. She also has a deal with Nike for other apparel and footwear.

  • Gatorade: Bueckers was the first college athlete to sign a multi-year endorsement deal with Gatorade.

  • Verizon: Bueckers has a partnership with Verizon, which she's used to gift her teammates new iPhones.

  • Dunkin' Donuts: Bueckers is also part of the Dunkin' Donuts family.

  • Unrivaled: Bueckers has signed a three-year deal with Unrivaled, a new professional 3x3 women's basketball league. This deal includes equity in the league.

  • Ally Financial: Bueckers has also signed an endorsement deal with Ally Financial.

  • Chegg: She is also an ambassador for the educational platform Chegg.

  • StockX: Bueckers has a partnership with StockX, a platform for sneakers and other collectibles.
This is what NIL was intended to be, not the money handout that football and men’s basketball have become.
 
Just spoke to the school as I wanted to discuss the issues that many of you have here.

The expected revenue sharing bill most likely will pass this week. The judge involved is retiring and this is her last case. So she is staying until it's completed.

The school is absolutely not holding off from accepting recruits waiting on the passing of the bill but I was told it's a dead period and the staff cannot talk to players until Friday. With that said the school is expecting two commits hopefully next week from power 5 schools.

We expect to have $5M NIL money this year and will build on that number next year.

The 50 State Challenge will conclude midnight tonight. It will not be extended. Later this afternoon I will post states that are needed. But I will be out of the house until approx 5PM

Again, split your donation to hit all the Challenges.

If you have any questions call Niko at 973 275 6446
 
I thought it was in this thread but didn’t someone reference that we had one or two Power 5 transfers in fold but was holding on the announcement?????
 
  • Like
Reactions: SHUisNJsTeam
Evidently there was mutual interest but the deals were never closed for some reason & they've moved on. Very strange.
 
Just spoke to the school as I wanted to discuss the issues that many of you have here.

The expected revenue sharing bill most likely will pass this week. The judge involved is retiring and this is her last case. So she is staying until it's completed.

The school is absolutely not holding off from accepting recruits waiting on the passing of the bill but I was told it's a dead period and the staff cannot talk to players until Friday. With that said the school is expecting two commits hopefully next week from power 5 schools.

We expect to have $5M NIL money this year and will build on that number next year.

The 50 State Challenge will conclude midnight tonight. It will not be extended. Later this afternoon I will post states that are needed. But I will be out of the house until approx 5PM

Again, split your donation to hit all the Challenges.

If you have any questions call Niko at 973 275 6446
The judge may have a decision in some weeks
 
Evidently there was mutual interest but the deals were never closed for some reason & they've moved on. Very strange.
Seems Bell was one and I’m not sure who the other was. Anyone want to speculate?
 
It was. In my view that is more legitimate NIL, because she actually brought more to the table than being a basketball player for a Connecticut.

She currently has deals with all of these companies:

  • Nike: Bueckers has a player edition Nike shoe, becoming the first NIL athlete to design and launch their own. She also has a deal with Nike for other apparel and footwear.

  • Gatorade: Bueckers was the first college athlete to sign a multi-year endorsement deal with Gatorade.

  • Verizon: Bueckers has a partnership with Verizon, which she's used to gift her teammates new iPhones.

  • Dunkin' Donuts: Bueckers is also part of the Dunkin' Donuts family.

  • Unrivaled: Bueckers has signed a three-year deal with Unrivaled, a new professional 3x3 women's basketball league. This deal includes equity in the league.

  • Ally Financial: Bueckers has also signed an endorsement deal with Ally Financial.

  • Chegg: She is also an ambassador for the educational platform Chegg.

  • StockX: Bueckers has a partnership with StockX, a platform for sneakers and other collectibles.
This is how NIL was envisioned. What has mostly transpired is nothing more than pay to play.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CL82

This is a detailed discussion of how the Connecticut A.D. views revenue sharing and NIL. It's a good, though long read.

Here's his thoughts about whether the big east will have an advantage under revenue sharing:

“I think the whole narrative around the fact that the Big East has this massive advantage is comical, in a way,” Benedict said. “And maybe it will play out that way. At this point, I’m very skeptical of that narrative. I’m not so sure that’s not just a narrative that is helping support individuals who are actually spreading that narrative to try to make sure they don’t fall behind, versus what the realities are. Because the suggestion that a group of universities that are getting probably 10 percent of what those [power conference] institutions are getting in media value — and we’re talking about tens of millions of dollars difference — that the schools getting 10 percent of what they are, are at a financial advantage is somewhat comical to me. The realities are, you can spend more of the cap on a particular sport. Well, you’d have to have the money first to be able to spend it. So yes, there is potential based on the formula and how things work, that you would have an easier time spending direct revenue share because you don’t have the massive investment that football requires. But you still have to have the money.

“Name me one school right now outside the Power 4 that is going to max out the cap. I’m not aware of any. It’s not because they don’t want to support their student-athletes. They’re not generating the same kind of revenue. Conferences are distributing, on the low end of the Power 4 levels, somewhere in the 40-plus million area, all the way up to the 60, 70, 80 million dollars. We get five, maybe. So how are we advantaged in that scenario, financially?"
 
Last edited:
Yes, but I mean she's making it the "real" way I would assume. Like Caitlin Clark did.
I would assume she’s making it the real way and the not real way. Gotta believe someone out there who is competing with UConn is saying we will give you booster money AND you can get endorsements too.
 
I would assume she’s making it the real way and the not real way. Gotta believe someone out there who is competing with UConn is saying we will give you booster money AND you can get endorsements too.
Maybe, but that doesn't take into account the NIL value of being a part of Connecticut women's basketball, playing in front of sold out arenas, with every game televised. I have to believe that if you took the same player and put them on a different team, their brand value immediately drops. There's probably only a half dozen teams in women's college basketball that are equivalent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dehere23 and HALL85
Maybe, but that doesn't take into account the NIL value of being a part of Connecticut women's basketball, playing in front of sold out arenas, with every game televised. I have to believe that if you took the same player and put them on a different team, their brand value immediately drops. There's probably only a half dozen teams in women's college basketball that are equivalent.
When you're that good, things take care of themselves. The most captivating womens basktball player in the last 30 years wouldn't have become more valuable if she left Iowa for UConn. I'll even add doing it somewhere other than UConn made her more valuable. Just like I think Steph Curry at Davidson made him more popular than Steph Curry at Duke
 
When you're that good, things take care of themselves. The most captivating womens basktball player in the last 30 years wouldn't have become more valuable if she left Iowa for UConn. I'll even add doing it somewhere other than UConn made her more valuable. Just like I think Steph Curry at Davidson made him more popular than Steph Curry at Duke
I'm inclined to agree with this, but Clark is an exception to this general rule. Her impact on women's college and pro basketball has been astounding.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Burnsly
Lawsuit waiting to happen. Who is going to determine if endorsement deals fall within a good range of compensation? I mean aren't those things negotiations and what happens if a Caleb Williams tells Wendy's he won't do it for X he wants 3X and Wendy's agrees, then the NCAA comes in and says nope that's too much you can't do it for that amount.

These rules continue to be stupid. It literally can prevent the truest form of NIL from happening.
 
I'm all for a player making money from a Wendy's. It's these generic collectives and billionaire alumni just paying players to play at there school which is the issue. And let people see how much extra NIL a person makes, this is big money so why isn't it regulated?
 
I'm all for a player making money from a Wendy's. It's these generic collectives and billionaire alumni just paying players to play at there school which is the issue. And let people see how much extra NIL a person makes, this is big money so why isn't it regulated?
Most of these big money people have their own business. Whats the difference between them and Wendy’s. And are you going to essentially discriminate this company can use a player but the local pizzeria can’t because he might be an alum? I’m for Bunny’s being able to use SHU players for business no different than Wendy’s. Seems like lawsuits waiting to happen if Wendy’s can do it but Bunny’s can’t. To me they’re all true NIL deals.
 
Most of these big money people have their own business. Whats the difference between them and Wendy’s. And are you going to essentially discriminate this company can use a player but the local pizzeria can’t because he might be an alum? I’m for Bunny’s being able to use SHU players for business no different than Wendy’s. Seems like lawsuits waiting to happen if Wendy’s can do it but Bunny’s can’t. To me they’re all true NIL deals.
Actually, one of the things that I think would have helped. The optimalsystem would've included a rule whereby players can't maintain eligibility if they take a NIL from a booster of the university that you play at. That ship may have sailed now, but had it been done from the get-go, I think it would've been a reasonable approach..
 
  • Like
Reactions: dehere23
Actually, one of the things that I think would have helped. The optimalsystem would've included a rule whereby players can't maintain eligibility if they take a NIL from a booster of the university that you play at. That ship may have sailed now, but had it been done from the get-go, I think it would've been a reasonable approach..
Please that’s so easy to get around. I’ll take my business and pay for a Rutgers player and I’ll have my buddy a Rutgers grad pay for a seton hall player. Essentially we will both help out our schools by working together.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pirate_Penguin
Actually, one of the things that I think would have helped. The optimalsystem would've included a rule whereby players can't maintain eligibility if they take a NIL from a booster of the university that you play at. That ship may have sailed now, but had it been done from the get-go, I think it would've been a reasonable approach..
a Cap would help with real penalties for trying to circumvent the cap like pro sports. or have some sort of tax where after a certain point over the cap you must start distributing a portion of that money to the remaining teams IN THE NCAA who did not go over the cap. super conferences that all go over the cap wouldnt get dinged otherwise.

also reinstate transfer rules. have a sit out year, teams would then have to pay 2 years for 1 year of play. teams can officially release players however, which can result in immediate transfer.

this would make it much more fair. so fair the SEC and BIG10 would leave , which at this point seems inevitable anyway. the NBA will intervene when their players start signing with Auburn or Michigan.
 
a Cap would help with real penalties for trying to circumvent the cap like pro sports. or have some sort of tax where after a certain point over the cap you must start distributing a portion of that money to the remaining teams IN THE NCAA who did not go over the cap. super conferences that all go over the cap wouldnt get dinged otherwise.

also reinstate transfer rules. have a sit out year, teams would then have to pay 2 years for 1 year of play. teams can officially release players however, which can result in immediate transfer.

this would make it much more fair. so fair the SEC and BIG10 would leave , which at this point seems inevitable anyway. the NBA will intervene when their players start signing with Auburn or Michigan.
I agree with you that the combination NIL and unrestricted transfers resulted in de facto free agency that is dramatically changing college basketball. I am not sure that the transfer restrictions would be legally allowed in the new era, but I do think that since schools are going to be paying kids directly, they certainly can put restrictions in the employment contract where a player would receive X for agreeing to play for one year, but X plus some premium for agreeing to play two years.

This whole just sucks and Emmert should be burned in effigy for his multiple failures that left us in this mess. The guy pretty much destroyed college athletics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The_Hall
a Cap would help with real penalties for trying to circumvent the cap like pro sports. or have some sort of tax where after a certain point over the cap you must start distributing a portion of that money to the remaining teams IN THE NCAA who did not go over the cap. super conferences that all go over the cap wouldnt get dinged otherwise.

also reinstate transfer rules. have a sit out year, teams would then have to pay 2 years for 1 year of play. teams can officially release players however, which can result in immediate transfer.

this would make it much more fair. so fair the SEC and BIG10 would leave , which at this point seems inevitable anyway. the NBA will intervene when their players start signing with Auburn or Michigan.
So much different than pro sports. No fan in pro sports is buying a player through "endorsements" while that is what is occuring in college sports. Pro sports don't monitor money other than what the pro team gives them. There's no need to. Here there are and who is anyone to say which money you can make or which money you can't. That's where lawsuits come in.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT