ADVERTISEMENT

Knight Commission urges NCAA to immediately implement gender, racial equality measures

Halldan1

Moderator
Moderator
Jan 1, 2003
191,051
107,168
113

Heather Dinich
ESPN Senior Writer

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The Knight Commission on Monday urged the NCAA to act immediately on two proposals to correct racial and gender inequities in NCAA athletics revenue distribution, and the group was staunch in its belief that the organization doesn't need to wait for a new NCAA president to do it.

According to the Knight Commission, the NCAA awards 28% of its annual revenue distribution -- more than $160 million -- based on Division I men's basketball teams' wins and participation in the NCAA men's March Madness tournament. By contrast, the NCAA awards no money for performance by women's basketball teams in the tournament.

The commission, which initially proposed equal revenue distribution in September 2021, doubled down on its call for the implementation of a gender equity principle that would require any NCAA athletics performance-based revenue distribution to provide equal rewards for the performance of women's and men's teams.

"I find it very troubling personally, to say the least, that the NCAA Division I Board of Directors still hasn't corrected this flagrant multimillion-dollar gender inequity in its revenue distribution," said commission co-chair Nancy Zimpher, chancellor emeritus at the State University of New York. "Every university president on the board knows full well that financial incentives reflect values and influence priorities, and this would be an easy fix to do right now."

The Knight Commission is also recommending that, to qualify for academic-based awards, institutions must first demonstrate that the gap between their Black and white athletes' graduation success rates is not more than 25 percentage points.

If this new racial equity criterion had been implemented in 2019, 66% of Division I schools would have qualified for the academic award instead of 79% of Division I schools, according to data from the commission. Roughly 1 in 8 schools that now qualify for academic awards would fail the racial equity graduation gap benchmark.

"We're at a time now where you have a transformation committee rethinking governance with regard to college sports, and in doing so, there's also a need to realign values and principles," said former Maryland All-American and NBA veteran Len Elmore, a co-chair of the Knight Commission. "And from a value standpoint, there's nothing more important than equity both from a gender standpoint as well as from a racial standpoint. So why wouldn't we, rightly intended, right-thinking people, now take a look at these issues and recognize that it's time to be on the right side? And I believe that the timing is proper. I think our voice and our advocacy has been strong. And I think the impact will be felt."

The commission recommended the NCAA's Division I board of directors implement these major changes to the NCAA's athletic and academic performance incentives, which total more than $200 million annually, in time to modify the 2023 revenue distribution.

A news release from the Knight Commission stated that if the Division I board "fails to act, the Board of Governors should review if Division I is operating in compliance with the new NCAA Constitution."

The Knight Commission is pushing for change at a time when the NCAA itself is in the midst of monumental change, including a complete restructuring of its governance and searching for a replacement for outgoing president Mark Emmert.

Former U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, a co-chair on the commission, called the NCAA governance structure "broken."

"There's an urgency to these things," he said, "and they should not at all wait until there's a new president."

When asked about the role of Congress in NIL, Duncan said he doesn't know of one industry, corporation or nonprofit anywhere that says, "Let's turn it over to Congress."

"I think everyone would prefer to regulate themselves," he said. "Congress only steps in when they see dysfunction, when they see a lack of leadership. ... It's absolutely in the NCAA's interest to not just sit around and wait for Congress to maybe do something, not do something, and Congress can never understand these issues as well as folks engaged in them actually do."

The Knight Commission is pushing the NCAA to recognize that schools with large racial graduation gaps among athletes are still qualifying for academic awards. According to the commission, based on the most recent public data from 2019, nearly 80% of the roughly 350 Division I institutions would qualify for the academic award by meeting one of the three benchmarks for academic success.

However, 47 of those schools had a graduation gap of more than 25 percentage points between their Black and white athlete graduation success rates.

"The NCAA should stop sending millions of dollars to schools that fail to close those gaps," Elmore said.

Following highly-publicized inequities at the 2021 NCAA men's and women's basketball tournaments, the NCAA hired the law firm of Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP for its external review of gender equity issues in connection with the NCAA, particularly its championships. Despite acting on most other recommendations in the August 2021 Kaplan Hecker report, the NCAA has not adjusted its revenue distribution formula.

"The general principle should be, if money is going out to male teams for any reason, it should be going to female teams for the same reason," said Robbie Kaplan, the founding partner of the firm.

"We've had a lot of turns at bat here and time is up," Zimpher said. "Waiting for new leadership to make these decisions will not allow us to recruit the kind of leadership the NCAA needs and deserves. ... This has to stop and voices have to be heard and it really comes down to a leadership issue. In this case, given we are searching for a new individual leader, the leadership is on our shoulders."
 
No one watches women’s basketball. Absurd.
Not true at all. Nearly five million people on average watched the Women's Championship game this year. The peak audience during the game was close to six million viewers.

I'd bet no Seton Hall game this year averaged even a third of that. Maybe not even one quarter.

For context, the Men's final logged just north of 18 million viewers.

If you want to make the argument that the audience is a fraction of that of the Men's game, have at it. In no way do the women deserve an equal take of the revenue but to say nobody watches is absurd.
 
Graduation rates black vs white is never going to be equal? This sounds bad but hear me out. 53% of NCAA basketball players are black. Of those what percentage are leaving early for Pro Career? Likely a much higher percentage that white players. Just look at the top 60 early entrants into draft. Only 2 are white. (1 if the kid from WF is considered Latino). If that’s the case most will graduate. And that is just the top 60. That doesn’t effect mid majors as much but the power6 schools will have a much higher percentage of players leaving for pro careers early age of those most will be black. How is it fair to punish a school for kids leaving early?
 
This issue drives me crazy and you see the same demands made in women's soccer regarding compensation.

The NCAA makes ZERO (2019 Women's March Madness - $2.8MM loss for NCAA) from women's athletics, in fact Men's D-1 basketball accounts for 82% of the NCAA revenue. How can anyone demand compensation, much less equal compensation, when they add ZERO financial value to an organization.

I'm all for Title 9 and women competing in college athletics, but, these demands have no basis in economics and the NCAA is a business.

I challenge anyone to research how much income/loss is generated by women's D-1 basketball, you'll be hard pressed to get an answer. The answer doesn't support the narrative.

 
Last edited:
Not true at all. Nearly five million people on average watched the Women's Championship game this year. The peak audience during the game was close to six million viewers.

I'd bet no Seton Hall game this year averaged even a third of that. Maybe not even one quarter.

For context, the Men's final logged just north of 18 million viewers.

If you want to make the argument that the audience is a fraction of that of the Men's game, have at it. In no way do the women deserve an equal take of the revenue but to say nobody watches is absurd.
Did you honestly think that I believe that literally no one watches women’s basketball?
 
This issue drives me crazy and you see the same demands made in women's soccer regarding compensation.

The NCAA makes ZERO dollars from women's athletics, in fact Men's D-1 basketball accounts for 82% of the NCAA revenue. How can anyone demand compensation, much less equal compensation, when they add ZERO financial value to an organization.

I'm all for Title 9 and women competing in college athletics, but, these demands have no basis in economics and the NCAA is a business.
Give women 100% of their tv deal.
 
I didn’t read that entire article but does the women’s tournament make a profit? How do you distribute what’s not there?

I believe the WNBA loses ~$10M on average annually and has never been profitable since inception. I’m assuming if the WNBA hasn’t been profitable in 30 years neither has the WNCAA tournament.
 
Not true at all. Nearly five million people on average watched the Women's Championship game this year. The peak audience during the game was close to six million viewers.

I'd bet no Seton Hall game this year averaged even a third of that. Maybe not even one quarter.

For context, the Men's final logged just north of 18 million viewers.

If you want to make the argument that the audience is a fraction of that of the Men's game, have at it. In no way do the women deserve an equal take of the revenue but to say nobody watches is absurd.
how many arent betting on the game?
 
every soul who touts equality for mens and womens sport is immune to understanding supply and demand or even a balance sheet.

why are they stopping so short on racial equality? we should have equality with the way scholarships are given out to every sport including mens football and basketball.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bluebeard
Did you honestly think that I believe that literally no one watches women’s basketball?
Of course not. But a good number of people watch. Not to mention places like UConn, Tennessee, South Carolina and others draw solid attendance numbers.
 
how many arent betting on the game? There get 6 million in the final game but probably. Don’t get that as a total for the rest of the woman’s tourney. Overall @walshtrips is right. They lose money overall.
 
I didn’t read that entire article but does the women’s tournament make a profit? How do you distribute what’s not there?

I believe the WNBA loses ~$10M on average annually and has never been profitable since inception. I’m assuming if the WNBA hasn’t been profitable in 30 years neither has the WNCAA tournament.
I found an article that indicated the NCAA lost $2,800,000 on Women's March Madness in 2019. Should we make the women pay the NCAA? Insanity - and nobody in authority has the balls to say it.
 
Of course not. But a good number of people watch. Not to mention places like UConn, Tennessee, South Carolina and others draw solid attendance numbers.
Yet per another post herein indicates that the women tournament loses money. Shall we seek compensation from the teams that play in the NCAA? There is virtually no interest in women’s basketball. Attendance figures alone bear out this claim, save very few schools from among 360+ D1 programs.
 
I didn’t read that entire article but does the women’s tournament make a profit? How do you distribute what’s not there?

I believe the WNBA loses ~$10M on average annually and has never been profitable since inception. I’m assuming if the WNBA hasn’t been profitable in 30 years neither has the WNCAA tournament.
Exactly.
 
Of course not. But a good number of people watch. Not to mention places like UConn, Tennessee, South Carolina and others draw solid attendance numbers.
Yet none of them bring in more money than the men and that's the point. Next we're going to suggest football, basketball, soccer, and baseball get equal funding. It's just stupid. And that's coming from someone who enjoys watching Seton Hall baseball more than Seton Hall basketball.
 

Heather Dinich
ESPN Senior Writer

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The Knight Commission on Monday urged the NCAA to act immediately on two proposals to correct racial and gender inequities in NCAA athletics revenue distribution, and the group was staunch in its belief that the organization doesn't need to wait for a new NCAA president to do it.

According to the Knight Commission, the NCAA awards 28% of its annual revenue distribution -- more than $160 million -- based on Division I men's basketball teams' wins and participation in the NCAA men's March Madness tournament. By contrast, the NCAA awards no money for performance by women's basketball teams in the tournament.

The commission, which initially proposed equal revenue distribution in September 2021, doubled down on its call for the implementation of a gender equity principle that would require any NCAA athletics performance-based revenue distribution to provide equal rewards for the performance of women's and men's teams.

"I find it very troubling personally, to say the least, that the NCAA Division I Board of Directors still hasn't corrected this flagrant multimillion-dollar gender inequity in its revenue distribution," said commission co-chair Nancy Zimpher, chancellor emeritus at the State University of New York. "Every university president on the board knows full well that financial incentives reflect values and influence priorities, and this would be an easy fix to do right now."

The Knight Commission is also recommending that, to qualify for academic-based awards, institutions must first demonstrate that the gap between their Black and white athletes' graduation success rates is not more than 25 percentage points.

If this new racial equity criterion had been implemented in 2019, 66% of Division I schools would have qualified for the academic award instead of 79% of Division I schools, according to data from the commission. Roughly 1 in 8 schools that now qualify for academic awards would fail the racial equity graduation gap benchmark.

"We're at a time now where you have a transformation committee rethinking governance with regard to college sports, and in doing so, there's also a need to realign values and principles," said former Maryland All-American and NBA veteran Len Elmore, a co-chair of the Knight Commission. "And from a value standpoint, there's nothing more important than equity both from a gender standpoint as well as from a racial standpoint. So why wouldn't we, rightly intended, right-thinking people, now take a look at these issues and recognize that it's time to be on the right side? And I believe that the timing is proper. I think our voice and our advocacy has been strong. And I think the impact will be felt."

The commission recommended the NCAA's Division I board of directors implement these major changes to the NCAA's athletic and academic performance incentives, which total more than $200 million annually, in time to modify the 2023 revenue distribution.

A news release from the Knight Commission stated that if the Division I board "fails to act, the Board of Governors should review if Division I is operating in compliance with the new NCAA Constitution."

The Knight Commission is pushing for change at a time when the NCAA itself is in the midst of monumental change, including a complete restructuring of its governance and searching for a replacement for outgoing president Mark Emmert.

Former U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan, a co-chair on the commission, called the NCAA governance structure "broken."

"There's an urgency to these things," he said, "and they should not at all wait until there's a new president."

When asked about the role of Congress in NIL, Duncan said he doesn't know of one industry, corporation or nonprofit anywhere that says, "Let's turn it over to Congress."

"I think everyone would prefer to regulate themselves," he said. "Congress only steps in when they see dysfunction, when they see a lack of leadership. ... It's absolutely in the NCAA's interest to not just sit around and wait for Congress to maybe do something, not do something, and Congress can never understand these issues as well as folks engaged in them actually do."

The Knight Commission is pushing the NCAA to recognize that schools with large racial graduation gaps among athletes are still qualifying for academic awards. According to the commission, based on the most recent public data from 2019, nearly 80% of the roughly 350 Division I institutions would qualify for the academic award by meeting one of the three benchmarks for academic success.

However, 47 of those schools had a graduation gap of more than 25 percentage points between their Black and white athlete graduation success rates.

"The NCAA should stop sending millions of dollars to schools that fail to close those gaps," Elmore said.

Following highly-publicized inequities at the 2021 NCAA men's and women's basketball tournaments, the NCAA hired the law firm of Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP for its external review of gender equity issues in connection with the NCAA, particularly its championships. Despite acting on most other recommendations in the August 2021 Kaplan Hecker report, the NCAA has not adjusted its revenue distribution formula.

"The general principle should be, if money is going out to male teams for any reason, it should be going to female teams for the same reason," said Robbie Kaplan, the founding partner of the firm.

"We've had a lot of turns at bat here and time is up," Zimpher said. "Waiting for new leadership to make these decisions will not allow us to recruit the kind of leadership the NCAA needs and deserves. ... This has to stop and voices have to be heard and it really comes down to a leadership issue. In this case, given we are searching for a new individual leader, the leadership is on our shoulders."
What’s next, the salaries of the WNBA must match of the NBA. Guaranteed that the Women’s BBall tourney makes zero money.
 
On topic

US soccer equalizes pay for men and women in landmark agreement​

By Associated Press

The U.S. Soccer Federation reached milestone agreements to pay its men’s and women’s teams equally, making the American national governing body the first in the sport to promise both sexes matching money.

The federation announced separate collective bargaining agreements through December 2028 with the unions for both national teams on Wednesday, ending years of often acrimonious negotiations.

The men have been playing under the terms of a CBA that expired in December 2018. The women’s CBA expired at the end of March but talks continued after the federation and the players agreed to settle a gender discrimination lawsuit brought by some of the players in 2019. The settlement was contingent on the federation reaching labor contracts that equalized pay and bonuses between the two teams.

“I feel a lot of pride for the girls who are going to see this growing up, and recognize their value rather than having to fight for it. However, my dad always told me that you don’t get rewarded for doing what you’re supposed to do — and paying men and women equally is what you’re supposed to do,” U.S. forward Margaret Purce said. “So I’m not giving out any gold stars, but I’m grateful for this accomplishment and for all the people who came together to make it so.”

uswnt.jpg

The USWNT reached an qual pay agreement with the US’ governing body of soccer.
AP

Perhaps the biggest sticking point was World Cup prize money, which is based on how far a team advances in the tournament. While the U.S. women have been successful on the international stage with back-to-back World Cup titles, differences in FIFA prize money meant they took home far less than the men’s winners.

The unions agreed to pool FIFA’s payments for the men’s World Cup later this year and next year’s Women’s World Cup, as well as for the 2026 and 2027 tournaments.

Each player will get matching game appearance fees in what the USSF said makes it the first federation to pool FIFA prize money in this manner.

“We saw it as an opportunity, an opportunity to be leaders in this front and join in with the women’s side and U.S. Soccer. So we’re just excited that this is how we were able to get the deal done,” said Walker Zimmerman, a defender who is part of the U.S. National Team Players Association leadership group.

The federation previously based bonuses on payments from FIFA, which earmarked $400 million for the 2018 men’s tournament, including $38 million to champion France, and $30 million for the 2019 women’s tournament, including $4 million to the champion United States.

FIFA has increased the total to $440 million for the 2022 men’s World Cup, and its president, Gianni Infantino, has proposed that FIFA double the women’s prize money to $60 million for the 2023 Women’s World Cup, in which FIFA has increased the teams to 32.

For the current World Cup cycles, the USSF will pool the FIFA funds, taking 10% off the top and then splitting the rest equally among 46 players — 23 players on the roster of each team. For the 2026-27 cycle, the USSF cut increases to 20% before the split.

After missing the 2018 World Cup, the men qualified for this year’s World Cup in Qatar starting in November. The women’s team will seek to qualify this year for the 2023 World Cup, cohosted by Australia and New Zealand.

For lesser tournaments, such as those run by the governing body of North America, players will earn identical game bonuses. And for exhibition games, players will receive matching appearance fees and performance payments based on the match result and opponent rank. Players who don’t dress will earn a fee that is the equivalent of participating in a national team training camp.

The women gave up guaranteed base salaries which had been part of their CBA since 2005. Some players had been guaranteed annual salaries of $100,000.

“I think we’ve outgrown some of the conditions that may look like we have lost something, but now our (professional) league is actually strong enough where now we don’t need as many guaranteed contracts, you know, we can be on more of a pay-to-play model,” Purce said.

Child care, covered for women for more than 25 years, will be extended to men during national team training camps and matches.

The women and men also will receive a portion of commercial revenue from tickets for matches controlled by the USSF, with bonuses for sellouts, and each team will get a portion of broadcast, partner and sponsor revenue.

Players will get a 401(k) plan and the USSF will match up to 5% of a player’s compensation, subject to IRS limits. That money will be deducted from the shares of commercial revenue.

“There were moments when I thought it was all going to fall apart and then it came back together and it’s a real credit to all the different groups coming together, negotiating at one table,” said federation President Cindy Parlow Cone, a former national team player who became head of the governing body in 2020. “I think that’s where the turning point really happened. Before, trying to negotiate a CBA with the women and then turn around and negotiate CBA terms with the men and vice versa, was really challenging. I think the real turning point was when we finally were all in the same room sitting at the same table, working together and collaborating to reach this goal.”

Women ended six years of litigation over equal pay in February in a deal calling for the USSF to pay $24 million, a deal contingent on reaching new collective bargaining agreements.

As part of the settlement, players will split $22 million, about one-third of what they had sought in damages. The USSF also agreed to establish a fund with $2 million to benefit the players in their post-soccer careers and charitable efforts aimed at growing the sport for women.

Mark Levinstein, counsel for the men’s union, said the agreement ended “more than 20 years of federation discrimination against the USWNT players.”

“Together with the USWNTPA, the USMNT players achieved what everyone said was impossible — an agreement that provides fair compensation to the USMNT players and equal pay and equal working conditions to the USWNT players,” he said. “The new federation leadership should get tremendous credit for working with the players to achieve these agreements.”
 
I found an article that indicated the NCAA lost $2,800,000 on Women's March Madness in 2019. Should we make the women pay the NCAA? Insanity - and nobody in authority has the balls to say it.

What’s next, the salaries of the WNBA must match of the NBA. Guaranteed that the Women’s BBall tourney makes zero money.
That's almost certainly true but the Women's tournament is part of an outdated rights agreement. The Men's Tournament deal is as well but there was a more recent extension.

The current deal with ESPN covers WBB and 28 other events (stuff like baseball, lacrosse, gymnastics et al). The current rights deal was signed in 2011 (an eternity when it comes to rights fees if you follow such things) and expires in August 2024. ESPN pays $34 million per year, which is a pittance.

A report commissioned by the NCAA last year believes the Women's Basketball tournament by itself is worth at least three times what that 29 sport package presently brings in. There is every possibility WBB will be have a stand alone rights agreement when the next deal is made.

Ratings spiked this year, first weekend games now air on ABC (valuable TV real estate) and like the Men's tournament all games are shown on one of the ESPN networks instead of the regional broadcasts of previous years. This year's finals featured an alternate broadcast for the first time and there are plans to move the championship game to ABC in Sunday night prime time.

I don't write all that to argue there should be equal monetary distribution. $100 million isn't $1 billion. But it's clear the sport is seeing a surge of interest. Based on this year's average per broadcast, close to 40 million people watched Women's tournament games this year.
 
On topic

US soccer equalizes pay for men and women in landmark agreement​

By Associated Press

The U.S. Soccer Federation reached milestone agreements to pay its men’s and women’s teams equally, making the American national governing body the first in the sport to promise both sexes matching money.

The federation announced separate collective bargaining agreements through December 2028 with the unions for both national teams on Wednesday, ending years of often acrimonious negotiations.

The men have been playing under the terms of a CBA that expired in December 2018. The women’s CBA expired at the end of March but talks continued after the federation and the players agreed to settle a gender discrimination lawsuit brought by some of the players in 2019. The settlement was contingent on the federation reaching labor contracts that equalized pay and bonuses between the two teams.

“I feel a lot of pride for the girls who are going to see this growing up, and recognize their value rather than having to fight for it. However, my dad always told me that you don’t get rewarded for doing what you’re supposed to do — and paying men and women equally is what you’re supposed to do,” U.S. forward Margaret Purce said. “So I’m not giving out any gold stars, but I’m grateful for this accomplishment and for all the people who came together to make it so.”

uswnt.jpg

The USWNT reached an qual pay agreement with the US’ governing body of soccer.
AP
In fairness, US Women's soccer is much more competitive, and exciting, than US Men's soccer. Not for the popularity of men's soccer worldwide, the US Men would not be bringing in the dough it's getting. This may work, but, we'll see what happens if US Men's soccer improves.
 
Big difference is that men’s players in this country are club teams $$$ first, national team second. Women are far and away the opposite when it comes to making a living.
 
I found an article that indicated the NCAA lost $2,800,000 on Women's March Madness in 2019. Should we make the women pay the NCAA? Insanity - and nobody in authority has the balls to say it.
Link?

it is a little challenging to figure out the net value of the women’s tournament because the rights to it are bundled into the men’s tournament deal. But, as someone pointed out, CBS sells the rights to the women’s tournament to ESPN for $34 million. The NCAA’s budgeted expenses for the women’s tournament are $14.5 million. That figures lower than the men’s tournaments for a lot of reasons, including the fact that the early rounds of the women’s tournament are held at the higher seeds arena, so the NCAA doesn’t pay for airfare and lodging for the higher seeded team. So, if we use those numbers, the NCAA women’s tournament makes $19.5 million. I have no problem with giving women’s teams a share of that, but the notion that they should get an equal share of the total March madness tevenue is meritless.

Oh, and for what it’s worth that hundred million dollar number is a consultant estimate of what the rights to women’s basketball might be worth at the high end of they were sold separately from the men’s tournament. It is highly speculative.
 
  • Like
Reactions: walshtrips
They have plenty of expenses…. Charter flights for the teams, all of the other operational expenses, not a lot of ticket sales and other non-TV revenue sources to go with it, plus they added extra costs this year after they outcry last season that they weren’t giving equal training stuff and other things that the men were getting.
 
That's almost certainly true but the Women's tournament is part of an outdated rights agreement. The Men's Tournament deal is as well but there was a more recent extension.

The current deal with ESPN covers WBB and 28 other events (stuff like baseball, lacrosse, gymnastics et al). The current rights deal was signed in 2011 (an eternity when it comes to rights fees if you follow such things) and expires in August 2024. ESPN pays $34 million per year, which is a pittance.

A report commissioned by the NCAA last year believes the Women's Basketball tournament by itself is worth at least three times what that 29 sport package presently brings in. There is every possibility WBB will be have a stand alone rights agreement when the next deal is made.

Ratings spiked this year, first weekend games now air on ABC (valuable TV real estate) and like the Men's tournament all games are shown on one of the ESPN networks instead of the regional broadcasts of previous years. This year's finals featured an alternate broadcast for the first time and there are plans to move the championship game to ABC in Sunday night prime time.

I don't write all that to argue there should be equal monetary distribution. $100 million isn't $1 billion. But it's clear the sport is seeing a surge of interest. Based on this year's average per broadcast, close to 40 million people watched Women's tournament games this year.
Must have been 38 million BOTs watching. Just not entertaining enough to believe 40
Million souls had nothing better to do.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT