Last Night

[Robot_Man]

there’s 330 million people in the country, even 500,000 isn’t a lot, but you’re excited over 10,000. Get a clue.

Not comparing the 2 other than a good number of people listened to them. Doesn’t mean they’re going to get 75 million votes.

Borders, economy, transgender in sports and so many other topics he was more center than Kamala. He never really had to move much because nobody forced him to. He was the more center candidate from start to finish. People appreciate consistency when it’s good. The Seton Hall pirates were consistent this year did you appreciate their consistency?

Do you see a lot of rallies with 500,000 people? Seems like you're just moving the goalposts.

I'd argue that Trump was the more extreme candidate than Harris. The demonization of immigrants (remember the Springfield, Ohio situation?), tarriffs (which almost nobody thinks is a good idea), and the transgender in sports stuff (which is a distraction, it's a non-issue meant to drive animus toward trans people in general).

To your last point about Seton Hall being consistently bad this year- I know you don't think that I think a consistently bad politician with odious views would be successful. There's a reason David Duke has run for political office many times and has had very little success to show for it.

 

[SHUHoopsFan]

Do you see a lot of rallies with 500,000 people? Seems like you're just moving the goalposts.

I'd argue that Trump was the more extreme candidate than Harris. The demonization of immigrants (remember the Springfield, Ohio situation?), tarriffs (which almost nobody thinks is a good idea), and the transgender in sports stuff (which is a distraction, it's a non-issue meant to drive animus toward trans people in general).

To your last point about Seton Hall being consistently bad this year- I know you don't think that I think a consistently bad politician with odious views would be successful. There's a reason David Duke has run for political office many times and has had very little success to show for it.

There weren’t 50 rallies with 10,000 people each. You’re creaming your pants over one rally. Big whoopdie do. Trump filled MSG, isn’t the makeup of that area all democrat. That one example on its own isn’t good enough to win the presidency but you’re taking the one example and saying see Bernie would’ve won. It’s really not a good argument

You can argue whatever you want but the American people spoke and wanted Trump. I believe when America goes too far in one direction the great American experiment finds a way to bring it back to the middle. If trans is a non issue why don’t dems just let it go and focus on real issues? If it’s such fair competition why aren’t women who’ve transitioned competing at the highest level vs guys?

Bernie’s and AOCs can win in their area. America as a whole they have no chance if they’re consistent with their message. America as a whole doesn’t want it. Democrats aren’t taking away from sure win. They take away from Bernie because it’s a sure loss

 

[Robot_Man]

There weren’t 50 rallies with 10,000 people each. You’re creaming your pants over one rally. Big whoopdie do. Trump filled MSG, isn’t the makeup of that area all democrat. That one example on its own isn’t good enough to win the presidency but you’re taking the one example and saying see Bernie would’ve won. It’s really not a good argument

You can argue whatever you want but the American people spoke and wanted Trump. I believe when America goes too far in one direction the great American experiment finds a way to bring it back to the middle. If trans is a non issue why don’t dems just let it go and focus on real issues? If it’s such fair competition why aren’t women who’ve transitioned competing at the highest level vs guys?

Bernie’s and AOCs can win in their area. America as a whole they have no chance if they’re consistent with their message. America as a whole doesn’t want it. Democrats aren’t taking away from sure win. They take away from Bernie because it’s a sure loss

I mean, New York City isn't all Democrats. Are you familiar with Staten Island, for instance? Or Long Island - not technically New York City, of course, but an easy LIRR ride right to Penn Station and the Garden is a quick walk or escalator upstairs.

The Democrats had to intervene twice to subvert popular opinion to sabotage his candidacy - strange that they had to do this to a guy who was supposedly a sure loss because he would have been so unpopular in the general. Says who?

Why are you taking as conventional wisdom what the Democratic Party thinks anyway? They thought calling Trump a fascist was going to resonate with people. They thought having Liz Cheney and Mark Cuban as her biggest surrogates to close the campaign was a political master stroke. The people who lead the Democrats are habitual losers and often wrong, and they never suffer any consequences for being wrong.

It's simply not true that Bernie doesn't have any cross-partisan appeal either. Do you remember back in 2020 when Joe Rogan said he would vote for Bernie?



And the Democratic establishment bashed Sanders for touting this (because they're idiots).

https://www.cnn.com/2020/01/24/politics/bernie-sanders-joe-rogan-endorsement/index.html

Well, I guess they changed their tune because it seemed like Harris was gonna go on Rogan's show during the campaign, but since the they didn't get exactly what they wanted with Rogan, they pulled the plug. Just an awful decision by her campaign.