ADVERTISEMENT

Manchin and Tuberville introduce bipartisan bill to shake up college sports

Halldan1

Moderator
Moderator
Jan 1, 2003
186,908
101,158
113

The PASS Act would set rules for NIL agreements and give the NCAA oversight powers​


Sens. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., and Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., on Tuesday introduced legislation that would overhaul collegiate athletics and create a national standard for using an athlete's name, image and likeness (NIL).

The bill comes two years after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the NCAA had illegally restricted education-based benefits that could be used as compensation to student athletes. In response to that decision, the NCAA Division I Board of Directors in 2021 implemented an "interim" policy suspending its NIL compensation rules until the NCAA adopted new rules or Congress passed legislation.

Now, Manchin, a former West Virginia University football player, and Tuberville, the former head football coach at Auburn University, have stepped in with the "Protecting Athletes, Schools and Sports Act," or PASS Act, to set rules for collectives and boosters, protect student athletes and maintain fair competition between schools and states. Their bill would require collectives and boosters to be affiliated with a college or school, prohibit inducements and ban certain NIL agreements, such as those that "involve alcohol, drugs, or conflict with existing school and conference licenses."

The PASS Act would grant the NCAA oversight and investigative authority over NIL activities. According to a press release, the association would be charged with reporting violations to the Federal Trade Commission.

The bill would also make changes to the transfer portal, requiring that student athletes complete their first three years of academic eligibility before allowing them to transfer without penalty, with few exceptions.

The legislation mandates that four-year institutions provide healthcare coverage to student athletes, including insurance to athletes who are uninsured for eight years after they graduate. Wealthier colleges and universities would be required to pay for out-of-pocket medical expenses for their athletes. An institution making more than $20 million in athletics revenue would be required to pay for two years of out-of-pocket medical expenses. Those making more than $50 million would be responsible for four years of out-of-pocket expenses.

Manchin and Tuberville said this legislation is the culmination of two years of conversations with stakeholders.

"As a former college athlete, I know how important sports are to gaining valuable life skills and opening doors of opportunity. However, in recent years, we have faced a rapidly evolving NIL landscape without guidelines to navigate it, which jeopardizes the health of the players and the educational mission of colleges and universities," Manchin said in a statement. "Our bipartisan legislation strikes a balance between protecting the rights of student athletes and maintaining the integrity of college sports."

"Student athletes should be able to take advantage of NIL promotional activities without impacting their ability to play collegiate sports," said Tuberville. "But we need to ensure the integrity of our higher education system, remain focused on education, and keep the playing field level. Our legislation with Senator Manchin will set basic rules nationwide, protect our student athletes, and keep NIL activities from ending college sports as we know it."

The press release included statements of support from NCAA President Charlie Baker, the Big 12 Conference, the Southeastern Conference and from school administrators.

Last week, Sens. Jerry Moran, R-Kan., Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., and Cory Booker, D-N.J., unveiled a similar bill, the College Athletes Protection & Compensation Act, which would set NIL standards and establish a Medical Trust Fund to provide care for injured athletes. The main difference is their bill would create the College Athletics Corporation to act as an oversight entity and set rules for NIL agreements, rather than grant that authority to the NCAA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: donnie_baseball
On the surface all these bills have merit. We can hope something happens in maybe two years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: batts
"Student athletes should be able to take advantage of NIL promotional activities without impacting their ability to play collegiate sports," said Tuberville. "But we need to ensure the integrity of our higher education system, remain focused on education, and keep the playing field level. ..."
200w.webp
 
The NCAA is in an inescapable bind here. There is no legal way for them to cap what athletes can earn from their names, images, and likenesses. If they want to impose restrictions such as the ones proposed here, they're going to have to stop pretending that this new, official professionalization of revenue-generating college sports is actually about anyone's name, image, or likeness and admit that it's now professional sports and that the athletes are employees of the school. Which is a road they simply do not want to go down.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SPK145

Pass Act aims to protect athletes, 'integrity' of college sports​


Dan Murphy, ESPN Staff Writer

For the second time in the past week, a bipartisan group of U.S. senators proposed a federal law that would regulate how college athletes are allowed to make money and reshape the healthcare they are guaranteed to receive from schools.

Sens. Tommy Tuberville and Joe Manchin introduced the Pass Act of 2023 on Tuesday, calling it a year-long effort that they hope "strikes a balance between protecting the rights of student-athletes and maintaining the integrity of college sports."

The bill is the first to be introduced this summer, but it joins other drafts of similar legislation shared by members of both the Senate and the House in recent months.

Federal lawmakers have proposed more than a dozen bills to reform college sports in the past three years, but thus far none has made it beyond the first step in the legislative process. Leaders from the NCAA, its most powerful conferences and many of its schools have traveled to Washington this summer to try to convince Congress to act. They say that the current lack of a nationwide standard has created a "race to the bottom" among state legislatures that are passing laws designed to try to give teams in their state a competitive advantage in recruiting.

Along with creating a national law for NIL deals, the Pass Act would also require schools to provide health coverage for sports-related injuries for eight years after athletes finish their college eligibility. Athletic departments that generate more than $20 million annually would also be required to cover out-of-pocket medical costs for two years after an athlete's playing career. Athletic departments that generate more than $50 million annually would have to cover four years of out-of-pocket expenses.

The bill also seeks to create a certification process for agents that work with college athletes, a public database for anonymized NIL data, and a uniform contract for athletes to use in NIL deals. Those items have been on the wish list of NCAA president Charlie Baker since he took on his new position in March.

Baker has said he wants Congress to create "consumer protections" for athletes as part of a new law.

"This important legislation is a major step in the right direction to ensure the health and safety of student-athletes, includes key measures to increase consumer protections and transparency in the NIL market, and aims to protect women's and Olympic sports," Baker said in a statement provided by press aides for Manchin and Tuberville.

The bill would make it illegal for states to pass individual laws that allow college athletes to receive a direct share of the billions of dollars of revenue they help to generate. This past year, a state representative in California proposed a bill that would allow for revenue sharing on teams that produce a significant amount of money for their schools. The bill was paused this summer.

"[The Pass Act] represents another step forward on the pathway to securing the future of college athletics," a joint statement from the Power 5 conferences said Tuesday. "The recent increase in activity from lawmakers demonstrates the growing consensus that federal NIL legislation is necessary and now is the time to act. We will continue working with members of Congress from both parties to develop a federal NIL standard in the coming weeks and months."

The senators also suggest making it against federal law for a college athlete to transfer without sitting out a year until he or she has used at least three years of their college eligibility -- except for extreme circumstances, such as the death of a family member. Coaches and athletic directors have complained during the past year that the combination of NIL money and a relatively new NCAA rule that allows players to transfer without penalty has made it difficult to maintain a steady roster.

"[W]e need to ensure the integrity of our higher education system, remain focused on education, and keep the playing field level," said Tuberville, who coached football at Texas Tech, Cincinnati and Auburn prior to starting his political career.

Congress begins its month-long summer recess next week. With an election year on the horizon and multiple pending legal cases that could make college athletes into employees of their schools or conferences, college sports administrators believe the window for passing federal legislation to regulate how athletes make money may be closing quickly.

Those leaders are still lacking consensus on the best way to address what they view as the problems with the current college sports model.


American Athletic Conference commissioner Mike Aresco, for example, said the NCAA needs "to be very careful" about "looking to Congress for answers to NIL and other questions" after reading a draft version of a bill introduced last week by three other senators -- Cory Booker, Richard Blumenthal and Jerry Moran -- that provided for more prescriptive changes to some of the NCAA's current operations.

"The current Blumenthal-Booker-Moran draft bill concerns me," Aresco's statement said. "Any such bill should be subject to great scrutiny. The establishment of a third party governing body overseeing college sports concerns me. WE should be controlling our affairs. Yes, we need some federal legislative or court protection, but WE need the ability to execute whatever reasonable plan that WE adopt."

ESPN's Heather Dinich contributed to this report.
 
Anything those two meatballs collaborate on is of little interest to me. Any ten random posters on this board are all easily smarter than Tuberville.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT