ADVERTISEMENT

NBA...WNBA....Kenosha

Not going to get into a debate on this. The first sentence could've easily been kept to yourself or re-worded. I respect your opinion and believe your heart is in the right spot, but sometimes the wording scares me. And believe me I butcher the English language as much as anyone, but what's said and what was meant to be said create 2 completely different reactions out of people. It gives people reason not to get along.

Fair enough I could of worded that better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hallsome
Considering he is black and has had the life experience to teach him what it is like to be a minority, could it be that he isn't the one that is brainwashed?

That's fine he can think that and I can call it what it is. College campuses have become brain washing centers and out players are not immune. My college where I graduated just sent a 55 page manifesto detailing the mandatory re-education training for professors and students. I will never donate a dollar to my university moving forward. It is wrong on every level.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SHUMatt and shu09
That's fine he can think that and I can call it what it is. College campuses have become brain washing centers and out players are not immune. My college where I graduated just sent a 55 page manifesto detailing the mandatory re-education training for professors and students. I will never donate a dollar to my university moving forward. It is wrong on every level.

Re-education for what? Curious to find out more about this.
 
Re-education for what? Curious to find out more about this.

Mandatory implicit bias training, anti-racist training, training on your privilege, renovating dorms to be more diverse since thru were "built for whites". It's pretty sickening. I am interested if they get pushback.
 
Mandatory implicit bias training, anti-racist training, training on your privilege, renovating dorms to be more diverse since thru were "built for whites". It's pretty sickening. I am interested if they get pushback.

You’re against learning about implicit bias, and anti how to not be racist?

Maybe it goes overboard but I’m not seeing a problem yet.

Do you have an example of what offends you about it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: JRSlim2284
Learning about bias. Sure.

Assuming all whites as racist simply because they are white.....is ...... well....racist.

Agree... but so far, he hasn’t conveyed that is what they are teaching.
 
Mandatory implicit bias training, anti-racist training, training on your privilege, renovating dorms to be more diverse since thru were "built for whites". It's pretty sickening. I am interested if they get pushback.

Disgraceful. This country has lost its mind.
 
You’re against learning about implicit bias, and anti how to not be racist?

Maybe it goes overboard but I’m not seeing a problem yet.

Do you have an example of what offends you about it?

Buddy it clearly called out whites in the document. I do not believe there should be anti-racism or bias training. Who is writing the material? Can blacks be racist or is it only whites? Broad generalization about a group of people are wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hallsome and shu09
Buddy it clearly called out whites in the document. I do not believe there should be anti-racism or bias training. Who is writing the material? Can blacks be racist or is it only whites? Broad generalization about a group of people are wrong.

Like I said, maybe they went overboard... but from what you described, I saw most of that as a good thing.
 
And how his law firm is ready to line up and sue people who've had enough of the COVID scam shutdown and want to get on with their lives.

You mean the hundreds of restaurants, sports teams, catering halls, gyms and other small businesses we are representing against insurance companies.

https://werbig.org/

But hey whatever fits your narrative.
 
You mean the hundreds of restaurants, sports teams, catering halls, gyms and other small businesses we are representing against insurance companies.

https://werbig.org/

But hey whatever fits your narrative.

That is not what you posted previously. I interpreted your previous post as saying you will be going after companies and schools that open.
 
That is not what you posted previously. I interpreted your previous post as saying you will be going after companies and schools that open.

I believe I said “firms like mine”.

As you can see with the above we fight for the little guy.
 
I believe I said “firms like mine”.

As you can see with the above we fight for the little guy.

If that's true, then I stand corrected. I hope your firm is not threatening businesses and people just trying to earn a living through all of these nonsense government restrictions.
 
If that's true, then I stand corrected. I hope your firm is not threatening businesses and people just trying to earn a living through all of these nonsense government restrictions.

That is one hell of an accusation what would make you think such a thing?

honestly what the ****?
 
  • Like
Reactions: buckfoston824
That is one hell of an accusation what would make you think such a thing?

Honestly wtf?

It's not an accusation. It's a statement that I hope you're not doing it, because it would be very, very wrong. You seemed to indicate that in your original post some days ago. You seemed to be bragging about how your powerful firm could go after people. Is that not correct?
 
It's not an accusation. It's a statement that I hope you're not doing it, because it would be very, very wrong.

Yea so is murder, rape and child molestation, so I hope you are not doing any of those as it would be wrong.

Do you not see what you just accused me and my business of all because I called this forum “an echo chamber “.
 
Yea so is murder, rape and child molestation, so I hope you are not doing any of those as it would be wrong.

Do you not see what you just accused me and my business of all because I called this forum “an echo chamber “.

I didn't accuse you of anything. Trying to get to the bottom of what exactly you are doing. You posted this in another thread on August 12:

"Schools are scared shitless of firms like mine taking them out one by one.
Covid is going to open up huge liability especially when it comes to heart issues with football players.

im no doctor but we just added a handful on staff to assist with Litigation’s of this type moving forward."

Who are you "taking out?" Who are you threatening? You just said you are working for the little guy, but a post like that doesn't seem to indicate that. What exactly is going on here?

I am impressed by the website you linked -- do you work for them? Do you own the firm? But I'd appreciate if you could clarify your remark from a few weeks ago.
 
Last edited:
No problem.

Without going into to much detail, many athletes are starting to see heart issues as a result of covid. We are starting to see this more in football players.

Many firms just like mine believe that these athletes once pushed at practice and on game day will then exasterbate this medical condition.

This is what many of the power conferences are worried about when it comes to playing games.

This is going to look very similar to the Ncaa concussion litigation, which we have roughly 40k clients for, firms will be going after the not only the schools, but the conferences as well. Many schools because of this litigation are scared shitless when we call because they know we are bringing the heat and not some frivolous lawsuit.

I am not threatening anyone I’m stating that law firms similar to mine are going to take action on these types of cases moving forward.

As a reaction to this we have put doctors on staff to help dig through this and get to the truth.

The little guy I speak of in regards to this possible litigation would be the student athlete. Shot there ant no one smaller then them on the ncaa totempole.


In regard to the website and business interruption my firm is part of a small group of firms who make up big.

My firm specifically represent restaurant groups in New York along with major league sports teams as well as colleges and universities as that is where our reach is in our community. Along with local restaurants, catering halls many of you have been married in, along with local groceries chains you shop in currently. Our goal is to help any business affected by this business interruption.


I’m the regular world we are a plantiff firm and represent client in mass torts against mostly Pharmaceutical companies. For example we recently led the litigation against Bayer on Roundup and Johnson and Johnson on talcum and invokana.

But over the last few years we have gotten involved in Litigation’s such as ncaa concussion, Equifax data beach, hurricane marie insurance claims, business interruption etc.

At the end of the day we fight for the little guy and go up against these mega corporations.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SHUSA
Agree... but so far, he hasn’t conveyed that is what they are teaching.

You wrote that in response to:

Learning about bias. Sure.

Assuming all whites as racist simply because they are white.....is ...... well....racist.

Do you recall this:

You’re against learning about implicit bias, and anti how to not be racist?

Those were your words.
 
No problem.

Without going into to much detail, many athletes are starting to see heart issues as a result of covid. We are starting to see this more in football players.

Many firms just like mine believe that these athletes once pushed at practice and on game day will then exasterbate this medical condition.

This is what many of the power conferences are worried about when it comes to playing games.

This is going to look very similar to the Ncaa concussion litigation, which we have roughly 40k clients for, firms will be going after the not only the schools, but the conferences as well. Many schools because of this litigation are scared shitless when we call because they know we are bringing the heat and not some frivolous lawsuit.

I am not threatening anyone I’m stating that law firms similar to mine are going to take action on these types of cases moving forward.

As a reaction to this we have put doctors on staff to help dig through this and get to the truth.

The little guy I speak of in regards to this possible litigation would be the student athlete. Shot there ant no one smaller then them on the ncaa totempole.


In regard to the website and business interruption my firm is part of a small group of firms who make up big.

My firm specifically represent restaurant groups in New York along with major league sports teams as well as colleges and universities as that is where our reach is in our community. Along with local restaurants, catering halls many of you have been married in, along with local groceries chains you shop in currently. Our goal is to help any business affected by this business interruption.


I’m the regular world we are a plantiff firm and represent client in mass torts against mostly Pharmaceutical companies. For example we recently led the litigation against Bayer on Roundup and Johnson and Johnson on talcum and invokana.

But over the last few years we have gotten involved in Litigation’s such as ncaa concussion, Equifax data beach, hurricane marie insurance claims, business interruption etc.

At the end of the day we fight for the little guy and go up against these mega corporations.

Thanks for clarifying. Makes sense now.
 
You wrote that in response to:



Do you recall this:



Those were your words.


Yes, I am aware of the words I wrote.
Maybe something is getting lost in the text here.

Learning about implicit bias, and things which might be offensive and racist to someone else does not make you a racist.

I don't mean to defend the paper in question. I haven't read it so I can't form an opinion, but what has been presented here so far is not a bad thing.
 
Yes, I am aware of the words I wrote.
Maybe something is getting lost in the text here.

Learning about implicit bias, and things which might be offensive and racist to someone else does not make you a racist.

I don't mean to defend the paper in question. I haven't read it so I can't form an opinion, but what has been presented here so far is not a bad thing.

I encourage anyone to read for themselves.

http://www.ne16.com/t/2349413/81989147/2702475/0/124910/?x=ad9cd64a

It is sickenening.
 
I encourage anyone to read for themselves.

http://www.ne16.com/t/2349413/81989147/2702475/0/124910/?x=ad9cd64a

It is sickenening.

The assumption that certain people make that America is at its core a racist nation is indeed sickening. That is the impetus behind trash documents like this.

It started some years back with "diversity," "inclusion" and "safe spaces." Now it has expanded into this. What's next? One could reasonably predict "thought police," which would be frightening.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SPK145
The assumption that certain people make that America is at its core a racist nation is indeed sickening. That is the impetus behind trash documents like this.

Aiming to be better does not mean we are bad.
It means there is room for improvement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: doctorcb12
Can you be more specific about what part bothers you so I can understand where you are coming from?

I am reading through this document as we speak. Recommendation 3 on page 10 is a good place to start. People go to college to earn a degree in a field of study, not to be forced into the garbage brainwashing that recommendation 3 requires.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_ezos2e9wn1ob0
I am reading through this document as we speak. Recommendation 3 on page 10 is a good place to start. People go to college to earn a degree in a field of study, not to be forced into the garbage brainwashing that recommendation 3 requires.

Recommendation 12 is also a disgrace.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_ezos2e9wn1ob0
Recommendation 12 is also a disgrace.

Recommendation 24 seems to go right to the "thought police" I mentioned before. Who deems what is appropriate and inappropriate? Dangerous precedent.
 
Recommendation 24 seems to go right to the "thought police" I mentioned before. Who deems what is appropriate and inappropriate? Dangerous precedent.

I'll try to read the whole thing at some point later, but we agree on that one.
 
Aiming to be better does not mean we are bad.
It means there is room for improvement.
We're all human beings. None of us are the second coming of Jesus Christ. There will always be room for improvement. Every time there's room for improvement, we can't trash a city. You can feel the need for improvement and not destroy a city. We've had room for improvement with every shooting of every child we've had recently. Because it doesn't fit a narrative cities are safe. We all know we have a need for improvement. There was a need for improvement under Obama. There was a need for improvement under Bush 43. There was a need for improvement under Clinton. Etc. A need for improvement is part of the human experiment. If there's a destruction of a city every time there's a need for improvement, this world is going to suck.
 
We're all human beings. None of us are the second coming of Jesus Christ. There will always be room for improvement. Every time there's room for improvement, we can't trash a city. You can feel the need for improvement and not destroy a city. We've had room for improvement with every shooting of every child we've had recently. Because it doesn't fit a narrative cities are safe. We all know we have a need for improvement. There was a need for improvement under Obama. There was a need for improvement under Bush 43. There was a need for improvement under Clinton. Etc. A need for improvement is part of the human experiment. If there's a destruction of a city every time there's a need for improvement, this world is going to suck.

I agree with all of that, but we were specifically talking about that document.

I agree there will always be room for improvement, and learning about ways we can improve doesn't really bother me.
 
Without going into to much detail, many athletes are starting to see heart issues as a result of covid. We are starting to see this more in football players.

Many firms just like mine believe that these athletes once pushed at practice and on game day will then exasterbate this medical condition.

The little guy I speak of in regards to this possible litigation would be the student athlete. Shot there ant no one smaller then them on the ncaa totempole.

Still don't know that I'm comfortable with this. The student-athlete is not forced to play. Isn't what's really right is to focus on full disclosure on potential consequences and then let the individual decide to play or not rather than look for what may look like frivolous and threatening lawsuits? I mean if you really care about the consequences and not just money?

Still sounds like you are playing in the dirt here, I don't like shameless dirty money.
 
  • Like
Reactions: anon_ezos2e9wn1ob0
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT