Anyone that doesn't believe this is just virtue signaling is diluting themselves. They were just ruled against in Supreme Court. Just trying to win favor with the left.
According to the timeline 4 players, all vaccinated, tested positive. I'm not really sure how that meets your point.
Your statement might work except that four of the players who tested positive were vaccinated. What do we tell them.
Um, that they can and should feel free to hold their unvaccinated teammates accountable? The ones who foolishly and recklessly brought this into their lockerroom?
From my understanding all unvaccinated players were removed from being able to play. They tested negative and couldn't play. I'm all for shutting it down if they test positive, but the testing mostly came back negative.
The 4 players who were vaccinated and tested positive was later in the week. The article that was posted about the timeline breaks it down well. Earlier in the week there was a player who was symptomatic(seems on initial testing he was negative before the start of the game) but still played. They tested him the next day he was positive and his roommate also was positive. Unclear what their vaccination status. Two other players also tested positive the next day and they were unvaccinated. The final tests among players were 4 players who were vaccinated. This was an unfortunate situation for all.
— At this point, the NCAA informed NC State that unvaccinated players would be removed from the game and only vaccinated players could play in the game. The NCAA gave NC State the option to either forfeit and try to play Saturday or play on with a limited roster. Avent and his team opted to play, though NC State sources say they proposed to the NCAA to play a doubleheader between the two teams on Saturday instead. That request was denied. At the start of the game, unvaccinated members of the Pack team were taken to the Marriott and tested. All of those unvaccinated members of the team were negative for COVID-19, including several prominent players on the roster. None of those players were able to return to the ballpark in time to enter the game.
I wouldn't be upset. Those players were still exposed and have no protection from COVID because they were not vaccinated. Therefore it made sense to keep them isolated because they still may turn up positive the following day. That is the decision those athletes/staff made and with that comes consequences. Regardless it is still a sad situation and I feel for their athletes.
Go Pirates.
Perfectly said.I wouldn't be upset. Those players were still exposed and have no protection from COVID because they were not vaccinated. Therefore it made sense to keep them isolated because they still may turn up positive the following day. That is the decision those athletes/staff made and with that comes consequences. Regardless it is still a sad situation and I feel for their athletes.
We also wouldn't have to worry about that with SHU basketball because the players are vaccinated thanks to the campus requirement and now don't have to undergo the annoying/rigorous testing they had to endure for a year
Do you feel all unvaccinated players from Vanderbilt should be unable to play tonight. Vanderbilt played NC State twice last week, once with NC State's full roster when symptons just started to appear. Clearly these teams were in contact with one another.
It is concerning for sure, but I would do contact tracing first and keep testing. In NC states case the NCAA needed to be more cautious because they are in the dugout together, sharing meals, staying in a hotel which pretty much exposes the entire team.
I wonder if Tim Corbin loses players next year because of that. There is a large number of SEC baseball players from the southern states which tend to have a let's wait and see more about this vaccine approach. Going to be interesting to see how these mandates impact athletes. I wouldn't doubt there are maybe 5 players in the top 100 in basketball who have no interest in getting the vaccine, will we be hearing that a player won't go to a major program because of that and would if it's a highly ranked player will a school try to sneak him in under the radar without getting the vaccine.
Yes the percentage of the country who thought for themselves and didn't come up with the same answer as you are stupid. All of them. Any of them applying to college should be rejected, perfect SAT score or not for it is obvious they don't have the brain power to amount to anything. If any of them are athletes we don't want them.
I would never let my child take an experimental vaccine that is proving to have a higher risk to people between 15-25 than the virus itself. This whole scamdemic has to stop. Let's get back to life. What the NCAA did is inexcusable.
Forcing 20 yr old kids to take an experimental drug for a virus that poses virtually ZERO risk to them is beyond obsurd. The drug is more dangerous than the disease for them. FACT! My kids are in college and I will not have them take it. I won't take it. Government favor force anyone to take a vaccine that hasn't been approved by FDA. It's only approved for emergency use.
im not on either side but thats definitely not a fact. the vaccines have a lower rate of serious effects then the virus does. thats an actual fact.
you are cast aside no matter what you think. much like you cast aside those that think the virus should be treated seriously
No doubt. With that narrative growing exceedingly more bizarre with every U-turn in the official virus narratives which were routinely derided in March 2020. Eg Wuhan lab events/Chinese government role, etc.
Is that a fact for all people or 15-25 year olds specifically
its a fact for all people.
I honestly don't see how you can say your info is fact or he say his info is fact. There clearly isn't enough data. In the last 10 days we're just finding out about heart issues in young people from the vaccines. Who knows what we find a month from now, 2 months from now, 3 months from now. The data is still young and we'll see where it leads. I'm pretty sure these things usually take 3 years to accumulate all the data. We shall see.
there is more than enough data. so youre wrong. but hey why dont you say anything to flonticello? cause his wrong opinion aligns with yours?
again, universities require vaccinations for numerous things. it can easily be considered "somebodies" business. or at the very least debated.
Sadly, you can’t “explore the acute and long term effects of covid” because it’s only been around since March 2020 so we’ll have to wait a number of years before anything that can reasonably be considered “long term” is actually there to look at! While we wait though the panic peddlers in government can continue to beg us to become governmental lab rats and threaten to take our freedoms away if we don’t comply!
