
North Carolina AD Bubba Cunningham under fire for controversial March Madness pick as contract incentives revealed
Fans and media alike are stunned by the inclusion of North Carolina in the field, especially with its AD

I guess we now know how 5 at large from the mvc happened in 2006This shit has been happening for decades. Either incompetent admins or ones with major financial incentives to pick a certain way. There should be no sniff of impropriety, no admins picking teams who may have agendas or conflicts.
How hard would it be to get an independent committee with a clear selection process. The committee should release their top 100 at-large schools for the tournament once a month starting in January so teams have an idea where they stand and what's being valued.
What was he going to say, they beat UConn in December? Literally the only thing he could say is the big east should get 4 teams and everyone elses response would be a few weeks ago they only lost to Nova by 25. They only lost to Creighton by 20 and UConn by 30 2 weeks ago. They only lost SJU by 19 3 days ago. Their NET is 59. My bet is if those games are somewhat competitive our efficiency numbers are better making our NET better and giving us a real shot. My guess is he picked his battles and it was battling for the seeds of the teams who got in.Which reminds me how useless the butler ad was for us as he sat on last years committee...
Certainly earned it this yearWhat a surprise. Total coincidence! Nothing gets decided by relationships or politics!
And he gets a bonus? 🤣🤣💀
My guess is the guy was an empty suit.What was he going to say, they beat UConn in December? Literally the only thing he could say is the big east should get 4 teams and everyone elses response would be a few weeks ago they only lost to Nova by 25. They only lost to Creighton by 20 and UConn by 30 2 weeks ago. They only lost SJU by 19 3 days ago. Their NET is 59. My bet is if those games are somewhat competitive our efficiency numbers are better making our NET better and giving us a real shot. My guess is he picked his battles and it was battling for the seeds of the teams who got in.
Maybe your anti cynicism posts about this are without some merit. They should not even have the appearance of these conflicts in the selection process. Not a good look for the committee and the NCAA.I guess we now know how 5 at large from the mvc happened in 2006
The very selection committee is made up of AD and Commissioners from P4 and then mid major conf...like foreverMaybe your anti cynicism posts about this are without some merit. They should not even have the appearance of these conflicts in the selection process. Not a good look for the committee and the NCAA.
Might have been but he needed something to stand on other than we had a big win 3 months earlier and we finished 4th in the conference. Nothing in the final 60 days of the season that said we’re playing good basketball. We beat a lot of non tournament teams. 4 gigantic blowout losses, 2 of them to non tournament teams. Maybe he could’ve said the other teams are equally mediocre but if that’s the best you got, it’s not good.My guess is the guy was an empty suit.
That doesn't mean that they don't have inherit conflicts of interests or they don't have an agenda. The lack of Q1 wins don't matter for UNC it is the Q2 wins that count. Oh wait Texas had 5 Q2 losses and were sub .500 in conference and Q2.The committees consist of one member selected from each of the five autonomy conferences and three members selected from the seven highest-ranked nonautonomy conferences based on basketball success. The remaining four members are selected from the 20 other conferences. All appointments are for five years.