![www.politico.com](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com%2Fdims4%2Fdefault%2F98e47b8%2F2147483647%2Flegacy_thumbnail%2F1200x799%253E%2Fquality%2F90%2F%3Furl%3Dhttps%253A%252F%252Fstatic.politico.com%252Ff6%252F20%252F2cefe5664573b620ed2b091fce49%252Fap21007129146451-1.jpg&hash=3838506e7413f4ca150872ded6b1e495&return_error=1)
Harvard removes Republican Elise Stefanik from advisory committee
Stefanik was among the 147 House Republicans who voted against certifying President-elect Joe Biden's electoral victory.
![www.politico.com](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.politico.com%2Ffavicon-32x32.png&hash=ef1c51c778ffaffa637b637cc35dbd80&return_error=1)
Of course not, but we know how NYSG rolls despite what he claims....Interesting way to frame it. Same sexist tagline for Mikie Sherrill?
Panties in a bunch is an idiomInteresting way to frame it. Same sexist tagline for Mikie Sherrill?
If you actually knew any women, they would disagree....Panties in a bunch is an idiom
That crashed and burned during bush 43 eraThis might be the strangest thread title of all time. And the only reason why @NYShoreGuy is naming this thread this way is because the woman in question is a republican. I thought liberals were all about acceptance?
He knows a lot of women on the Twitter.If you actually knew any women, they would disagree....
Panties in a bunch is an idiom
you have a long history of getting your panties in a bunch
It’s just my opinion so don’t get your panties in a bundle (although you usually do).
Did either of those posters call NYSG out for being sexist on this thread? That should be easy to research.One many here are familiar with. At least their pearls are safe.
I am not going to get my panties in a bunch with regards to how the MSM is portraying Trumps words.
Did either of those posters call NYSG out for being sexist on this thread? That should be easy to research.
Nah, just poor research and everyone here was just pointing out a hypocrite when we see one.Nah, just saying everyone here cases about as much about the phrasing as they do about what Stefanik was doing.
Nah, just poor research and everyone here was just pointing out a hypocrite when we see one.
If you can't see the hypocracy in NYSG's postings, I can't help you. I think that was pretty obvious.....to everyone else.Had NY called someone sexist for using that phrase, then I would agree with you.
It's a common phrase which many people here have used and no one cared at the time.
My lord. Do you guys remember the way Hillary was talked about? Panties in a bunch??? A friend of mind's Mom used to say that about her kids all the time. In the 60s. She had 4 sons...loflIf you actually knew any women, they would disagree....
another guy that missed the whole point of the criticism. Have Merge research the definition of "hypocrit" for you and you might get it.My lord. Do you guys remember the way Hillary was talked about? Panties in a bunch??? A friend of mind's Mom used to say that about her kids all the time. In the 60s. She had 4 sons...lofl
And Ill put far left crazy again far right crazy any time.
Yet Harvard has recognized Stacey Abrams with a politics award. The same Stacey Abrams that still hasn’t conceded the 2018 GA governors race and still claims widespread fraud.
No issues if you criticize Abrams for not conceding. She deserves it, but there are some vast differences between these scenarios.
I don’t pretend to be offended by this stuff. Maybe you missed the tongue in cheek from the others....One many here are familiar with. At least their pearls are safe.
Ha!another guy that missed the whole point of the criticism. Have Merge research the definition of "hypocrit" for you and you might get it.
And Ill put far left crazy again far right crazy any time.