ADVERTISEMENT

RFK MAHA

We are fortunate to have someone as passionate as RFK jr working on this. One look around at the people visiting Costco and you know there’s a problem. I’m there shopping but watching every item I put into my cart. 80% of the food we buy has issues.
 
MSM will continue to paint him as an “anti-vaxer”.

He's earned that though. He has brought a lot of junk and lies into the discussion. When confronted about any of what he got wrong, he then covers it by saying he's just asking questions, or just wants more research etc.

Could still be a net benefit overall, so I'll judge by what he takes on.
 
He's earned that though. He has brought a lot of junk and lies into the discussion. When confronted about any of what he got wrong, he then covers it by saying he's just asking questions, or just wants more research etc.

Could still be a net benefit overall, so I'll judge by what he takes on.
Not denying he’s said some controversial things about vaccines, but that’s all the MSM ever talks about. He actually makes some good points, but it’s all about the narrative to discredit.
 
60 percent of the voters are not college educated...they dont have credentials to get better paying jobs and they eat the cheapest most highly processed food options
 
Great pick. He will have a tough time fighting the food lobby, but maybe we actually have a chance to change our foods now.
 
Universal health and population safety is a very socially liberal policy. Why don’t democrats embrace it….. $$$$$$ and power

RFK wants us to further evaluate and study the effects of vaccines on populations- the side effects- the risks and that will lead to safer and more efficacious vaccines.

The fact you aren’t allowed to question big pharma cutting corners is insanity.
 
https://www.politico.com/story/2008/11/rfk-jr-too-controversial-for-epa-015403

So Obama considered RFK to run the EPA….

And given his positions on the environment you would think the left would love him…lol

His experience been in environmental law which would have made him well suited for the EPA.
Republicans at the time called him too radical for the position.

Because of how often he dives into conspiracy theories on health though, it's hard to take him seriously even though he might say some things I'd agree with against the food and pharma lobbies.

He still has the opportunity to be successful in the position, but push back would of course be expected because of his crazier health takes. I didn't think Levine was a great pick either, but at least her background was in health.
 
His experience been in environmental law which would have made him well suited for the EPA.
Republicans at the time called him too radical for the position.
And that’s how it works. When you’re on the side of one party, you’re the enemy of the other. And when you switch so do they. Same thing with Musk and Gabbard.
Because of how often he dives into conspiracy theories on health though, it's hard to take him seriously even though he might say some things I'd agree with against the food and pharma lobbies.
He said some whacky things about the environment back then too. I don’t get it, but having the “Kennedy” name gets the public attention.
He still has the opportunity to be successful in the position, but push back would of course be expected because of his crazier health takes. I didn't think Levine was a great pick either, but at least her background was in health.
He’ll get pushback and should get it. I’d like to see how he handles the grilling.

She was horrible as the head of PA Department of Health. Having background and being incompetent along the way but getting jobs strictly because of being a trans…just as dangerous.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Merge and Gohall129
His experience been in environmental law which would have made him well suited for the EPA.
Republicans at the time called him too radical for the position.

Because of how often he dives into conspiracy theories on health though, it's hard to take him seriously even though he might say some things I'd agree with against the food and pharma lobbies.

He still has the opportunity to be successful in the position, but push back would of course be expected because of his crazier health takes. I didn't think Levine was a great pick either, but at least her background was in health.
I think we have to make some radical changes in health. People with backgrounds in health have been leading us down the wrong path constantly. It seems we are continuously reactionary as opposed proactive. We look to solve symptoms and not prevent the problem. Most likely these experts are put in those positions to advance the money of big food and big pharma. Not for nothing doctors take less than 20 hours of nutrition over 4 years of school. It's not like they're much greater experts than anyone else.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Merge
I think we have to make some radical changes in health. People with backgrounds in health have been leading us down the wrong path constantly. It seems we are continuously reactionary as opposed proactive. We look to solve symptoms and not prevent the problem. Most likely these experts are put in those positions to advance the money of big food and big pharma. Not for nothing doctors take less than 20 hours of nutrition over 4 years of school. It's not like they're much greater experts than anyone else.
System...r and d goes to new medicines, trials etc...pharma invites docs to junkets and getaways and in return they push this onto their patients
 
System...r and d goes to new medicines, trials etc...pharma invites docs to junkets and getaways and in return they push this onto their patients
You're the pro system guy. You like fluoride in water because that's what the system has said for years. Doctors push drugs/vaccines because that's what the system wants and that's the system big pharma and big food have created. You probably love it.

And nobody over decades has done the right thing for the American people and said the system isn't just broken, it's F'd up. It takes balls to stand up to these systems with so much money and power. We watch commercials with disclaimers of thoughts of suicide, diabetes, possible stroke or heart attack, etc and we act like that's normal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gohall129
I do not know of one dermatologist that says its fine to be out in the sun without skin protection

I do not know of one cardiologist that says inactivity, alcohol, smoking and a high saturated fat diet is good for your heart

I do not know one endocrinologist that claims a high content sugar diet is good for your body

There are poorly nutrient easily affordable options to consume...that is primary, portion control is another red flag...people eat too much in a sit down...i mean hell look at 7 11 or wawa you can a 60 oz 72 oz soda...straight poison into the body

Me personally, i quit most dairy, limit beef and pork, pasta and bread, big on chicken and fish, more nutrient dense grains, veg, fruit, since 2009 i probably have had a combo of 5 guys, popeyes, kfc, wendys, mcdonalds 15 to 20 times, drink veg and fruit cold pressed juice
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT