ADVERTISEMENT

Rothstein on WFAN yesterday

This is a down year for the conference. While there really aren't any "bad" teams except for Depaul and St. John's, we only have 3 teams in the top 40 RPI. Last year we had 6, and deservedly got 6 in the dance. That ain't happening this season. I don't think Rothstein's comment about the league being down is wrong, nor do I think he is incorrect in saying that conferences like the Big 12, ACC, Big 10 etc are on a different level this year.

Nova is a solid squad, but does anyone whose watched a lot of college ball think they are one of the top 5-7 teams in the country? I don't. The tourney is a lot about matchups - look at Xavier's run last year - and they were probably the worst of the 6 teams that danced. But absent some really favorable matchups, I don't expect the conference to make much noise.

Jon Rothstein ‏@JonRothstein Feb 18


Sterling Gibbs last year at Seton Hall vs THIS YEAR at UConn:
16.3 PPG, 43.1% FG, 43.6% 3-pt FG.
12.6 PPG, 39.6% FG, 37.8% 3-pt FG.
 
This is a down year for the conference. While there really aren't any "bad" teams except for Depaul and St. John's, we only have 3 teams in the top 40 RPI. Last year we had 6, and deservedly got 6 in the dance. That ain't happening this season. I don't think Rothstein's comment about the league being down is wrong, nor do I think he is incorrect in saying that conferences like the Big 12, ACC, Big 10 etc are on a different level this year.

Nova is a solid squad, but does anyone who has watched a lot of college ball think they are one of the top 5-7 teams in the country? I don't. The tourney is a lot about matchups - look at Xavier's run last year - and they were probably the worst of the 6 teams that danced. But absent some really favorable matchups, I don't expect the conference to make much noise.

He was calling into question the conference's relevance or strength since its inception, clearly stating that last year's performance in the NCAA was awful and the conference needs to prove something this year. I agree with him that the Big East needs to do better in the NCAA tournament. However, our record against other conferences during the regular season should not be dismissed. He had no problem with the SEC as one of "the Power 5" in basketball. The SEC isn't such a strong conference. Kentucky is their claim to fame. After that, there isn't much. The Big East is clearly a better conference than the SEC.
 
Agree with you 100% in that.

He was calling into question the conference's relevance or strength since its inception, clearly stating that last year's performance in the NCAA was awful and the conference needs to prove something this year. I agree with him that the Big East needs to do better in the NCAA tournament. However, our record against other conferences during the regular season should not be dismissed. He had no problem with the SEC as one of "the Power 5" in basketball. The SEC isn't such a strong conference. Kentucky is their claim to fame. After that, there isn't much. The Big East is clearly a better conference than the SEC.
 
Just win. Beat providence next week and take care of St. John and DePaul like we are supposed to and there will be no debate on who is better between providence / Shu and who deserves bid or higher seed.
 
The conference needs a good run by some teams in the tournament. It's important for reasons such as this. Unfortunately that's not happened in recent years and for all the dominance by Villanova in particular, they have spit the bit in the tournament.

The new Big East has landed 10 teams into the Tournament in its first two years. They are 7-10 and only one reaching has far as the Sweet Sixteen.

That futility was the context for much of what Rothstein was saying.
 
Bottom line it's not a good look for the conference if Villanova goes 18-0 every year and can't make it out of the first weekend.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Piratz
The conference needs a good run by some teams in the tournament. It's important for reasons such as this. Unfortunately that's not happened in recent years and for all the dominance by Villanova in particular, they have spit the bit in the tournament.

The new Big East has landed 10 teams into the Tournament in its first two years. They are 7-10 and only one reaching has far as the Sweet Sixteen.

That futility was the context for much of what Rothstein was saying.
Excellent point. Once Seton Hall makes the tournament, I will be rooting for every Big East team to go as far as possible, just so long as we win any head to head battles!
 
I root for every be team to win every ooc game, regular season or ncaa. The success of a new league is not a given and we have to have a couple of second week end teams at worst.
 
I always root for the BE teams as well. Need the eyeballs, need the hype, need the perception that comes with winning in March.
 
.................However, our record against other conferences during the regular season should not be dismissed. He had no problem with the SEC as one of "the Power 5" in basketball. The SEC isn't such a strong conference. Kentucky is their claim to fame. After that, there isn't much. The Big East is clearly a better conference than the SEC.

Kenpom

1 Big 12 Conference .8525

2 Atlantic Coast Conference .8163

3 Pac 12 Conference .7842

4 Big East Conference .7710

5 Big Ten Conference .7672

6 Southeastern Conference .7528

7 American Athletic Conference .6781

8 Atlantic 10 Conference .6157

9 Colonial Athletic Association .5780

10 Mountain West Conference .5375
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT