ADVERTISEMENT

See statistical analysis of 1st Nova Game stats vs SHU Season and Nova-Opponents' Season averages

Old_alum

All World
Nov 22, 2006
14,719
3,129
113
The first column is the category (e.g. FGA).

The second is SHU in that first Nova Game compared to its own season average to date.

The third highlights those categories with a greater than 15% variance.

The fourth is SHU in that first Nova Game compared to Nova's Opponents' season average to date.

The fifth highlights those categories with a greater than 15% variance.

We are not really a good rebounding team when one looks at the percentage of rebounds grabbed (off or def) as a percent of the missed shots. We just hold opponents to lower shooting percentages so we have more opportunities to get the 2/3rds of Def Reb customarily grabbed.

Here you go FWIW:


Categ SHU @ Nova . SHU @ Nova . 15% . . . . . . SHU @ Nova . . . . . . 15%
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v SHU Season . . . . . . . . v Nova Opp . . . . . .

FGM . . . . 21 . . . . . . -20% . . . . . . <<<<<< . . . . . . -5% . . . . . .
FGA . . . . 59 . . . . . . . . 1% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3% . . . . . .
FG% . . . . 36% . . . . . -20% . . . . . . <<<<<< . . . . . . -7% . . . . . .

2pt FGM. 15 . . . . . . . -27% . . . . . . <<<<<< . . . . . . -17% . . . . . . <<<<<<
2pt FGA. 43 . . . . . . . . . 2% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -3% . . . . . .
2pt FG%. 35% . . . . . . -29% . . . . . . <<<<<< . . . . . . -14% . . . . . .

3pt FGM. 6 . . . . . . . . . . 9% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52% . . . . . . <<<<<<
3pt FGA. . 16 . . . . . . . -3% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26% . . . . . . <<<<<<
3pt FG%. 38% . . . . . . 12% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21% . . . . . . <<<<<<

FTM . . . . 15 . . . . . . . . . -7% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48% . . . . . . <<<<<<
FTA . . . . 25 . . . . . . . . . 2% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76% . . . . . . <<<<<<
FT% . . . . 60% . . . . . . . . -8% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -16% . . . . . . <<<<<<


OREB . . . 15 . . . . . . . . . 11% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38% . . . . . . <<<<<<
% Oreb. . 34% . . . . . . . . -6% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15% . . . . . . <<<<<<


DREB . . . 24 . . . . . . . . . -10% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -13% . . . . . .
% Dreb . . 57% . . . . . . . -17% . . . . . . <<<<<< . . . . . . 10% . . . . . .

REB . . . . 39 . . . . . . . . . . -3% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1% . . . . . .

AST . . . . 11 . . . . . . . . . -16% . . . . . . <<<<<< . . . . . . 18% . . . . . . <<<<<<
STL . . . . . 8 . . . . . . . . . . . 8% . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 177% . . . . . . <<<<<<
BLK . . . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . -55% . . . . . . <<<<<< . . . . . . -3% . . . . . .

TO . . . . . 12 . . . . . . . . . -15% . . . . . . <<<<<< . . . . . . 14% . . . . . .
PF . . . . . 24 . . . . . . . . . . 30% . . . . . . <<<<<< . . . . . . 65% . . . . . . <<<<<<


We took the same FGA but made 20% fewer.

We made lower FG% on 2 pt FGA but higher on 3 PT FGA

Our Def and Off Reb as % of total was far worse than our average but far better than Nova Opponents' average.

Overall we played very poorly in the paint --- no surprise.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT