I'm actually going to agree and disagree with you on this, carefully, because yours was the most on-point and powerful post in the thread. Yes, one has nothing to do with the other, and yes, this seems a frivolous complaint, which possibly was tongue-in-cheek, given the source (no pun).
However, society does have a real issue with producing young adults who are unable to cope with any adversity, because every effort is made to shield them from it through the childhood and adolescent years. We're seeing it -- in record numbers -- on college campuses, who are scrambling to provide mental health staff that most hospitals would be envious of. I see it first-hand, every day, and as a new parent, it's frightening as hell, and the buck stops with me and my peers. So to come fully around the circle, if something as cheap and easy as a slobbering dog can give students a couple minutes of joy -- whether they need it or not -- we should probably be applauding it. If you want to criticize anyone, start with parents over the last 20-25 years, and right behind them the school administrators.
I know what you see, so I take that seriously. And it's going to always be most incumbent upon a parent to inculcate his or her children with the kind of mentality and approach to life you want them to adapt. It's no guarantee, but your parents rubbed off on you, just as mine did on me. I'm not just like them at all, but the core values are there, and that's parenting.
Outside the home, there are any number of factors that shape a culture, though. In this case, you have the increased awareness of mental illness and stress factors. Add that to a society that is also increasingly litigious, as well as the competitive nature of college student recruitment that demands institutions provided more student amenities and comforts than ever before, and you will be able to observe instances where these factors all converge. Kids petting therapy dogs is, as you say, a rather harmless and even fun manifestation of that.
Now, to play some devil's advocate: I'll go the other route and say that while it's easy for conservative (or whatever corrupted distortion of conservatism Fox is speaking to now) media to troll the internet for instances of "snowflakes seeking safe spaces" in order to create divisive wedges between older folks and the younger generations, these kids aren't given enough credit for adapting to the actual adversity they face. The professional environment of today practically demands college degrees for everyone (and really multiple degrees), as the opportunities for the non- or under-educated have evaporated. So given that these degrees are essentially required, tuition is a built-in cost of attaining adulthood, and tuition has multiplied exponentially. With parents already over-leveraged and over-mortgaged to never-before seen heights, it is all but assumed that these degrees will be paid for with expensive loans, which, of course, become an albatross for these young people after they graduate. These delay the departure from home, the purchase of their own homes, and all sorts of things trickle down from there. And I'm not even going down the road of how much harder it has become to earn admission to the types of schools that will provide any sort of value to their graduates - that's a whole other subject, but the things students must do in order to gain an edge over their follow applicants has them doing things and participating in incredibly time-consuming co- and extra-curricular activities that were completely unnecessary even a generation ago.
So the much-heavier burden these kids carry just to gain access to a viable workforce are more time-consuming, expensive, and stressful than ever before, and that
still all carries less promise to get ahead than it historically has, given that the burden of financing the government has been increasingly heaped on the shoulders of the middle class at levels that would have been unconscionable fifty or sixty years ago. And yet these kids forge ahead, taking careful note of the unfair criticism they bear as "snowlflakes," "millennials" (frequently misapplied to people of a generation younger than actual millennials, the first of whom are nearly 40 years old now), or worse.
I know where you're coming from, donnie, and you know we're more on the same page than often appears, once we can inject a little nuance into the conversation. So I'm really speaking more generally here, sticking up for a generation that I do think is unfairly maligned, and for no good purpose. In a different context, I enjoy an intergenerational laugh about them, too, but when it comes to actual brass tacks, I think they've gotten the shit end of the stick.