What Iran deal? Was not approved by the Senate as all treaties are to be so there really was never a deal.If this is a serious question, I would probably not choose the guy who withdrew the U.S. from the Iran nuclear deal.
What Iran deal? Was not approved by the Senate as all treaties are to be so there really was never a deal.If this is a serious question, I would probably not choose the guy who withdrew the U.S. from the Iran nuclear deal.
I'm not a christian so not sure how me being against killing unborn babies is a christian position. Sorry for the whataboutism but you, me, and Harris are evidently all not christian.So your answer is no one has character. Gimme a break. You can't answer aside from MSM talking points, which is something you of all people I find hilarious. I don't think anyone can. If you wanna play that game, you're supporting someone who wants to take free will out of people's hands. Don't argue the abortion issue, as that's a Christian value and You're supporting a "Christian" who has committed adultery times, among other things. You're supporting someone who can only say something nice to someone who says it to him 1st.
LOL, what was her main qualification to be VP? Jamaican and Asian perhaps? It's not like she's very well educated or intelligent, the proof is quite easy to see. Perhaps being the most liberal senator had something to do with it.At the rate you're talking, you probably think she's a "DEI hire."
You don't need to wait, be honest about your chosen candidate as well.Back to my original point, no one can defend his character without doing whataboutism. You can't say he's not worse than the others without lying to yourself. So again, I'll wait
Completely facile argument - if Donald Trump did the Iran nuclear deal and Biden subsequently withdrew from it, I would have considered it an error of the Biden administration.Yeah and he added tons of sanctions on them after. So it's not like he withdrew from the deal and walked away. He went about it differently than Obama, who allowed them to continue research and development on nuclear weapons. If you're cutting them off why the hell did we allow them to continue R&D? There was tons of pressure still being put on Iran just not through the Obama deal. That's the part that upsets you most.
It's so weird how President Trump was able to withdraw the U.S. from something that didn't exist.What Iran deal? Was not approved by the Senate as all treaties are to be so there really was never a deal.
Exactly.It's so weird how President Trump was able to withdraw the U.S. from something that didn't exist.
I understand the point you're making, but the answer is yes, I do think the people speaking out for "naturally born women" are being misogynistic.Funny how the people you're saying have casual misogyny are the ones speaking out for naturally born women to not have to compete with one time males in sports. How misogynistic is that?
i think they’re going to look back in 20-30 years and say how did we allow our own people to do such physical and emotional harm to themselves, especially the kids. Imagine how many 7 year olds would regret their Paw Patrol or Peppa Pig tattoo if they were allowed to get one at 7.I understand the point you're making, but the answer is yes, I do think the people speaking out for "naturally born women" are being misogynistic.
I think people are going to look back at these trans panic ads in 30-40 years and conclude that this country still had a long way to go in terms of tolerance and acceptance.
Completely disagree. There would be proof of this type of behavior from you by thanking Trump for shutting down little Rocket man.Completely facile argument - if Donald Trump did the Iran nuclear deal and Biden subsequently withdrew from it, I would have considered it an error of the Biden administration.
Can’t read the article because login info is needed but I’m guessing an article written in 2024 has much to do about how Biden handled the sanctions.Also, we've already had sanctions on Iran for decades and we know that they don't work as intended. You can very easily make the argument that sanctions, which the United States have used increasingly in recent decades across the world (not just in Iran), make the world (and America) less safe.
Broad US sanctions on Iran have failed, have tightened regime's grip, experts say
If sanctions are too hard to lift, they lose power: panelists Remaining trade consolidated in Revolutionary Guard companies US sanctions on Iran have not worked as intended, in part because comprehenswww.spglobal.com
I guess we'll see in 30 years.i think they’re going to look back in 20-30 years and say how did we allow our own people to do such physical and emotional harm to themselves, especially the kids. Imagine how many 7 year olds would regret their Paw Patrol or Peppa Pig tattoo if they were allowed to get one at 7.
You might want to read the Declaration of Independence. Our forefathers had common sense. They understood whatever they created at some point might lead to destructive government. I suggest you read it.forefathers who you all love would spit on your grave for that.
I hope you have a team of mental health assets and a hermetically sealed safe space if Trump somehow manages to win.Just as I expected. It's hopeless and remains desperately pathetic here. Not going to read through all the (self?) delusional nonsense. But unless you're writing, "I want the candidate who tried and wants to overthrow our elections" then it's just the same intellectual dishonesty that's always been, just dozens more posts and hundreds more empty words of it to add to the pile of tens and hundreds of thousands across the years. Sad
Go pet a cat and calm down already.
theres mental illness on both sides. two people on the right tried to assassin THEIR candidate.There's a mental health crisis in this country among leftists. Just on this board alone, we have one who has intentionally stopped being friends with people because of their political leanings. We have another who says it's "hopeless and desperately pathetic" that people might actually think one candidate might be better than the other.
Exhibit A - Mental health rant.theres mental illness on both sides. two people on the right tried to assassin THEIR candidate.
i mean, theres people right here on this board that are chomping at the bit to support a candidate that tried to undermine liberty. there's people here that are worried about their neighbors gun hobby over kids getting mowed down. theres people here that plaster another man's name over their property like a cult. there's people here that would rather live in a constant state of fear and hate than come to terms with a woman president.
its not about comparing candidates, it's about willingly overlooking things that would completely disqualify one. if trump was the female in this situation i would bet my house you all would be singing a different tune.
Actually it is about comparing candidates. Many feel things Trump has said and done are disqualifying, but he'd still be a better President than Kamala because of one simple question, are you better off now than 4 years ago?its not about comparing candidates, it's about willingly overlooking things that would completely disqualify one. if trump was the female in this situation i would bet my house you all would be singing a different tune.
A rant just proves the mental health issue. All people who don't agree with me are bad is a sound logical argument of a well balanced open minded person.Exhibit A - Mental health rant.
One of them is going to win; life will go on after tomorrow. Vote your choice; vote your conscience; what purpose does a rant serve?
I can appreciate the transparency of people expressing opinions on the message board, but the whole idea of ending friendships because of who you vote for? That is just so bizarre.A rant just proves the mental health issue. All people who don't agree with me are bad is a sound logical argument of a well balanced open minded person.
The US population has an abundance of tolerance and acceptance. What it lacks from time to time is understanding and common sense. You are totally garbling the meaning of misogynistic by confusing those who think they are women with women. Your unquestioning acceptance of the trans narrative is in and of itself misogynistic and gives a false hope to those who consider themselves trans.I understand the point you're making, but the answer is yes, I do think the people speaking out for "naturally born women" are being misogynistic.
I think people are going to look back at these trans panic ads in 30-40 years and conclude that this country still had a long way to go in terms of tolerance and acceptance.
A rant just proves the mental health issue. All people who don't agree with me are bad is a sound logical argument of a well balanced open minded person.