The rag had nothing this am on SHUs win over Georgia. I guess they too busy covering mediocrity and turmoil over at RU. UNBELIEVABLE.
Told you guys in another thread they had no one at the game.what's worse is there is not even a game story on NJ.com. Jeremy Schneider typically covers SHU hoops for NJ Advanced Media. Nothing to be found online.
First off I noted that there were not a lot of media in the room. I also noted the short session was not Willard's fault as only Jerry Carino and I stepped up to ask questions.Halldan reports that there were entirely four questions asked in the presser after the game, two by himself. So - no quotes, no insight, no repartee, no relationship, no story.
Frankly, cannot blame the Star-Loser on this. My view is that the battle lines have been sufficiently drawn between the press and coach talks-a-lot. It is what it is. I expect this to continue.
We all pretty much know that communications of any kind are the weakest tool in his toolbox. It will not change.
So - let's focus on the winning. Honestly, did not think they could do it, but in the second half, worked harder and more together. They earned it.
Told you guys in another thread they had no one at the game.
Pitiful.
Respectfully. what would you call it?Pitiful seems like a very strong and unnecessary word to use.
Respectfully. what would you call it?
Big East team vs an SEC team on a Saturday night at the Rock and the biggest newspaper in the state doesn't see the need to send anyone,even an independent reporter to cover the game.
WSOU is always there. But a few 'usuals' were not.Dan, you mentioned there were younger guys in the room. Who are they - Setonian staff and your best pal at the SOJ site? With only 2 other guys asking questions, that's an opportunity for them to stick their nose in there even if it's to lob softballs.
You're killing me big guy. LOLLOL - I'd call it CONTEXT.
Given your first sentence (you TOLD us stuff in another thread), the second sentence comes across as saying that we your readers are pitiful! The second sentence most logically refers back to the object of the first sentence.
However, you have supplied context - the shift in your focus is to the importance of the game - and your comment is now understood to mean "pitiful" that it was not covered.
Now we're all clear.
And of course - I agree with you.
That's insulting to the fish!It's painfully obvious that the Ledger has absolutely no interest in covering hig major Division 1 sports. The best thing you can do, if you haven't already, is cancel this rag. Such a once great paper has become nothing more than an expensive fish wrapper!
That's true. Apologies to any fish out there who were offended. I am truly sorry!That's insulting to the fish!
Since 2000.Do you. live in Vegas? Will be there for MLK weekend in January
Now that's what I'm talking about!That's true. Apologies to any fish out there who were offended. I am truly sorry!
Let me give that one more try! The only thing it's good for is wrapping Rutgers crap!
Chris Iseman had a nice article in the Record with quotes from the kids and the coach. I guess most of this board lives in the central part of the state, because the Record covers northern NJ.
http://www.northjersey.com/sports/basketball/halftime-talk-fires-up-hall-1.1464388
The Record still does a decent job of covering Seton Hall (and the Devils as well). I recently moved from Bergen County to Essex County, and I am still able to get it delivered. I believe the Record is available in Bergen, Passaic, Morris, Hudson and Essex counties/