I categorically refute SHU is a "very tough job " simply because so many consistently successful programs have fewer assets in terms of location, conference, name recognition, etc. ( St Mary's, Dayton, Davidson, Zaga, Evansville back in the day comes to mind).
What's tough is enduring the desertion of an Amaker mostly because he was ill-equipped to handle his recruits and bailed then compounding that error by hiring 2 successive replacements with nothing in their resume to suggest a good fit ( other than being cheap and stubborn).
As for current HC, we would be wise to not lose him over $ or administration interference. Wiser still to make Sha associate HC ($) and HC overnight should we lose Willard and I will tell you why. Not since PJ's heyday have we had this dual success on the court and in the classroom. It pains me that this board doesn't seem to appreciate how rare that is and vital to attracting good players who are also good students. And there are enough of them that you can have both.
I am grateful that our current staff is getting even better at passing on potential problem children. In the end it benefits us all. Sha and Grant are alums, they wouldn't embarrass The Hall. Willard and Hill are pros who are mindful of their rep and legacy. The staffs hard work and principle is successful because it always is - not because of the relative "toughness" job. It takes a village, lol.
Go Pirates!