ADVERTISEMENT

The War On Warriors

HALL85

All Universe
Gold Member
Jul 5, 2001
37,623
21,039
113
Retired army officer sent me the book as he knows I have an interest and respect for history and our military.

The book provides great insight into why Trump selected Hegseth as Secretary and why he will continue to stand behind him. But even if Hegseth did something egregious, 90% of his work has been completed already in the first hundred days and my guess is the vast majority of rank-and-file military are applauding his actions.
 
Retired army officer sent me the book as he knows I have an interest and respect for history and our military.

The book provides great insight into why Trump selected Hegseth as Secretary and why he will continue to stand behind him. But even if Hegseth did something egregious, 90% of his work has been completed already in the first hundred days and my guess is the vast majority of rank-and-file military are applauding his actions.
Lunacy
 
Retired army officer sent me the book as he knows I have an interest and respect for history and our military.

The book provides great insight into why Trump selected Hegseth as Secretary and why he will continue to stand behind him. But even if Hegseth did something egregious, 90% of his work has been completed already in the first hundred days and my guess is the vast majority of rank-and-file military are applauding his actions.

Whether someone is Left, right or independent- Hegseth is a loser who should not be in that position. He was chosen because he was on Fox and loved Trump.
 
Whether someone is Left, right or independent- Hegseth is a loser who should not be in that position. He was chosen because he was on Fox and loved Trump.
He was chosen to clean house in the military, which he’s pretty much done.
 
A house cleaning that was long overdue
https://www.newsnationnow.com/us-news/military/army-recruiting-record-highs-trumps-win/

And the results have been positive thus far. Recruitment is up significantly since the election. Hegseth has long been a proponent of one set of standards (rather than lowering the overall standards or having two sets - one for men and one for women. Being a soldier should be outcomes focused, which the military had deviated.
Those that supported the DEI initiatives didn't like him speaking out. At the end of the day we need a top flight military force but impediments needed to be removed.

Measure success as are we enlisting more soldiers that can meet and exceed one set of standards.
 
Virtually every DEI and woke leader has been purged. Milley was the worst.

The next target will be the defense contractors. 80% of the generals who have retired over the last 10 years are now serving on the boards or consulting with defense contractors or their lobbyists. Do you think Hegseth is going to look at that favorably? He supported a 10-year moratorium post retirement on taking any of those jobs.
 
Was the alternative someone who was qualified but unwilling to clean house, or could they have nominated someone who could have accomplished the goals AND have not been a talk show host that shares war plans with friends and family?
Don’t know. Hegseth experienced the changes in standards, woke policies and I’m sure having a recognizable media/public presence certainly helped.

He’s essentially accomplished the objective and recruiting is up. He’s certainly not perfect and has made some mistakes, but if the rank and file of the military feel our defense is stronger than I’m okay.
 
He’s essentially accomplished the objective and recruiting is up.


December 2024 was the highest December enlistment in 15 years and the administration rightfully touted that. but it was less than August 2024. I'm sure there is a segment of people who signed up because of Trump winning but enlistment was up in 2024 and on pace to exceed fiscal year goals because of a new training facility in 2022 and an additional 1,000+ recruiters in 2023. Seems disingenuous to give all credit to Trump / Hegseth here.

Point being that we didn't need someone who is unqualified for the position. We could have have someone qualified who respected rules and regulations and still have been where we are today.
 
December 2024 was the highest December enlistment in 15 years and the administration rightfully touted that. but it was less than August 2024. I'm sure there is a segment of people who signed up because of Trump winning but enlistment was up in 2024 and on pace to exceed fiscal year goals because of a new training facility in 2022 and an additional 1,000+ recruiters in 2023. Seems disingenuous to give all credit to Trump / Hegseth here.
The numbers continue to be strong and we can sit back and see how it plays out. Hegseth embodies the warrior mentality and who the target demographic is for the military. The woke policies and different standards were a big problem. So more recruits and a stronger military.
Point being that we didn't need someone who is unqualified for the position. We could have have someone qualified who respected rules and regulations and still have been where we are today.
Trump trusted Hegseth to clean house and eliminate the DEI initiatives and he did that. Hegseth has certainly made mistakes but we can debate whether someone else would have ripped the bandaid off so quickly and effectively. I’m not suggesting he was the best choice, but he has accomplished what Trump (and he) wanted.
 
Last edited:
The numbers continue to be strong and we can sit back and see how it plays out. Hegseth embodies the warrior mentality and who the target demographic is for the military. The woke policies and different standards were a big problem. So more recruits and a stronger military.

Trump trusted Hegseth to clean house and eliminate the DEI initiatives and he did that. Hegseth has certainly made mistakes but we can debate whether someone else would have ripped the bandaid off so quickly and effectively. I’m not suggesting he was the best choice, but he has accomplished what Trump (and he) wanted.
Lol!
 
Retired army officer sent me the book as he knows I have an interest and respect for history and our military.

The book provides great insight into why Trump selected Hegseth as Secretary and why he will continue to stand behind him. But even if Hegseth did something egregious, 90% of his work has been completed already in the first hundred days and my guess is the vast majority of rank-and-file military are applauding his actions.
Does the book give any insight into why Trump used al his power and all his skills to avoid the draft when the US was fighting a war, needed all men on deck, and he was of age.

Equating Don Trump IN ANY WAY with the word warrior is almost as ridiculous as those pictures of Trump with the muscles bulging.
 
Does the book give any insight into why Trump used al his power and all his skills to avoid the draft when the US was fighting a war, needed all men on deck, and he was of age.
Nope, and the book was written before Trump was elected.
Equating Don Trump IN ANY WAY with the word warrior is almost as ridiculous as those pictures of Trump with the muscles bulging.
Trump is no warrior. Hegseth never claims he is.

Trump is the elected President and you can take what you want from the book, but pretty much everything Hegseth identifies for necessary change in the military in the book, has now been implemented.
 
Nope, and the book was written before Trump was elected.

Trump is no warrior. Hegseth never claims he is.

Trump is the elected President and you can take what you want from the book, but pretty much everything Hegseth identifies for necessary change in the military in the book, has now been implemented.
And what this poster fails to reveal here is that the imprint broadside books is a conservative publisher and the parent is News Corp but carry on
 
And what this poster fails to reveal here is that the imprint broadside books is a conservative publisher and the parent is News Corp but carry on

Yet you post non-stop stream of consciousness from left wing talking heads on a daily basis. Hold yourself to the same standard before you go after others.
 
I posted here years ago how FOX News was an bad development for the USA. Yes, the media was left leaning. But we have had three runaway races in my lifetime and Nixon and Reagan won 2 of them. And now the pres rates the media simply on how favorable (I mean fair) they are to him. Where did we read about that before?

Conservs watch FOX or something further right if they wish. They watch the news for hours and learn the other side hates America and them and wants to take away their freedoms.

And liberals watch a left leaning media outlet for too long each day as well, and are told that the other side hates America and them and wants to take away their freedoms.

And we wonder why we cant get along.

And the Internet deciding what links we want based on what links we picked yesterday just makes me hate the media and the internet lol.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT