Basketball :: College Poll Tracker :: Breaking down college polls every week of the season.
collegepolltracker.com
I would've preferred Sha be able to tell the recruits at the game we're in the top 25. Pitino and McDermott aren't stupid. They're having their teams focused on the first place pirates regardless if there's a number in front of our name or not.I was excited at the possibility but actually happy they didnt make it given the importance of this week ahead.
I wasn't really concerned what the other teams . Sha seems like a great motivator but I was more concerned about the players letting off the gas a bit after hearing some good news. I also think its easier to motivate by saying how they got robbed instead of saying now teams will have a target on your back so you better play hard.I would've preferred Sha be able to tell the recruits at the game we're in the top 25. Pitino and McDermott aren't stupid. They're having their teams focused on the first place pirates regardless if there's a number in front of our name or not.
OOC the reason
It hurts whether or not they’ve seen SHU play. It’s there. Whether you like it or not, it can’t be ignored.I really think our bad NET rating hurt us with those voters who were unsure or hadn't seen us play or weren't very familiar..
Or are just lazyI really think our bad NET rating hurt us with those voters who were unsure or hadn't seen us play or weren't very familiar..
Interesting that SJU much higher than us in the Net but not getting the AP voters love.No one in South Orange got hosed. There’s still too much ground to make up and too many other good teams out there.
The silliness in the process is seen with the two voters who had SHU 22 and 23 last week, but off their ballots this week. But that sort of stuff is common, which is why these things are just as debatable as the analytic-based rankings.
So what ranking do you think we deserve and which teams should we jump?I guess voters haven’t been paying attention yet to college basketball closely
Hosed just keep winning
I guess voters haven’t been paying attention yet to college basketball closely
Hosed just keep winning
The polls have zero to do with the NET. UConn going to No. 1 means nothing unless their actual NET score improves with it.Curious- as our opponents' rankings fluctuate, do our previous Wins and Losses get re-weighted/re-calculated? ie- does Connecticut moving up to #1 help our NET -or- is it calculated against the NET at the time of the Win?
You beat 3 ranked opponents and win multiple road games for weeks you tell meSo what ranking do you think we deserve and which teams should we jump?
So what ranking do you think we deserve and which teams should we jump?
Give us the examples of teams who don't belong over us and why. Defend your position.You beat 3 ranked opponents and win multiple road games for weeks you tell me
Hosed
No one.You beat 3 ranked opponents and win multiple road games for weeks you tell me
Hosed
Ok, but others have won as well, granted some have also lost but who do you see above us that you feel should be below us? Others have to move down for us to move up. We crapped the bed earlier in the season and now we’re paying for it. You can’t lose to bad teams, especially at home. It doesn’t make it impossible to overcome, we still have time, but we do have more ground to make up.You beat 3 ranked opponents and win multiple road games for weeks you tell me
Hosed
They’ve done a good job and made up a ton of ground. Just not enough yet to be ranked. Not sure what’s so hard to understand.You beat 3 ranked opponents and win multiple road games for weeks you tell me
Hosed
Have you actually researched this?Carino does what is right , which is not to show bias toward ur local team, but the West Coast writers (along with Big10 and ACC ) always help their teams out.
For example, Marquette beats Nova today and we should get a little bump.They’ve done a good job and made up a ton of ground. Just not enough yet to be ranked. Not sure what’s so hard to understand.
Actually, looks like he doesn't necessarily favor the east coast. Just deviates a ton from the other pollsters. Including giving us our highest ranking, 15.The voter with the most extreme bias (according to that site that shows how everyone votes and who has the most outliers) is based in Connecticut and favors east coast schools (including the hall)
The polls have zero to do with the NET. UConn going to No. 1 means nothing unless their actual NET score improves with it.
NET scores are re-calculated daily with the previous day's game results included. You may not play but your ranking will rise or fall depending on what those around you do. Games are calculated at the time of play but things such as quad records change based on how teams move up and down the ranking over the course of the season.
For example, our Marquette win is Q1 because they are top 30 in the NET. If they fall below 30 that game is a Q2 win for us. The better example may be Providence since they are in danger of dropping out of the top 75. Again, a Q1 win would become a Q2 in that example.
I'm sure writers not very familiar with our program we're influenced by our low net rating when compared to others they were thinking of voting for
That’s why you should follow national guys like Katz Rothstein etc on how they vote. And if you did you’d see SHUYES Lloyd..each year in the preseaon rankings look at the number of ACC / Big Ten schools making up the ranking. Then compare those rankings mid way or at the end of the year. Each year the big name bias or big school bias prevails until they have to take them out. Furthermore , as previously posted , look at the Pac 12 voters compared to the east coast voters. All voters are people with a brain and spinal cord....the only difference (from a physiological point of view) is their bias toward their locations
Katz doesn't have a vote in the AP. Neither does Gary Parrish at CBS. But he doesn't have us in his top 25 and one. Said a lot of nice things about last Tuesday night. His and one is playing in Newark tomorrow though.That’s why you should follow national guys like Katz Rothstein etc on how they vote. And if you did you’d see SHU