ADVERTISEMENT

You don't say

Right, the people on this board who unequivocally condemned rioting on Jan 6
I don’t understand the point he’s trying to make. Everyone condemned it and supported the investigation.
 
Right, the people on this board who unequivocally condemned rioting on Jan 6
they didnt. some gave a few default words to say they did it. and im still not talking about that. im talking about the original post. do you even know what it is? you realize youre unequivocally deflecting in real time?
 
I don’t understand the point he’s trying to make. Everyone condemned it and supported the investigation.
well actually the first thing everyone did was deny the govt had any part planning it. the entire sherril thread documents this. now another source states that members of congress potentially had in depth planning of the event, offering pardons, etc all you guys talk about is that rolling stone was wrong about an article one time.

multiple people have now disregarded this on more than one occasion. even now you dont have anything to say for it.

this article is news. just like baldwin is news. you seem much more riled up about baldwin. maybe if alec baldwin planned the jan6 events you might bat an eye. eh probably not. i mean, we literally have people in this thread still talking about fraud. theyre not batting an eye at this because they identify with those on the steps jan6.
 
well actually the first thing everyone did was deny the govt had any part planning it. the entire sherril thread documents this. now another source states that members of congress potentially had in depth planning of the event, offering pardons, etc all you guys talk about is that rolling stone was wrong about an article one time.

multiple people have now disregarded this on more than one occasion. even now you dont have anything to say for it.

this article is news. just like baldwin is news. you seem much more riled up about baldwin. maybe if alec baldwin planned the jan6 events you might bat an eye. eh probably not. i mean, we literally have people in this thread still talking about fraud. theyre not batting an eye at this because they identify with those on the steps jan6.
You are wrong once again. The opinions expressed were that if the information Sherril tweeted was true, than it should be investigated and those held accountable. If her tweet was opportunistic grandstanding with no factual basis, then she should be held accountable.

Wanna try again?
 
  • Like
Reactions: afghan whigs
You are wrong once again. The opinions expressed were that if the information Sherril tweeted was true, than it should be investigated and those held accountable. If her tweet was opportunistic grandstanding with no factual basis, then she should be held accountable.

Wanna try again?
He doesn’t understand. It’s ok. He enjoys labeling people here fat, white, insurrectionists. Good for him. Gotta do what you enjoy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: afghan whigs
You are wrong once again. The opinions expressed were that if the information Sherril tweeted was true, than it should be investigated and those held accountable. If her tweet was opportunistic grandstanding with no factual basis, then she should be held accountable.

Wanna try again?
the opinions were that she was grandstanding. not if she was. every single attempt to make it so that it wasnt true. just like the rolling stones convo here. its not even debatable what people's stances are based on their posting behavior. ya know, like the way you all comment on nyshores dem related posts... think that but opposite.
 
the opinions were that she was grandstanding. not if she was. every single attempt to make it so that it wasnt true. just like the rolling stones convo here. its not even debatable what people's stances are based on their posting behavior. ya know, like the way you all comment on nyshores dem related posts... think that but opposite.
She was grandstanding by throwing out a tweet without any information behind it. Now whether it was true or not has not been validated. And the opinions were back then if it wasn't true she should be held accountable...same still applies.
 
She was grandstanding by throwing out a tweet without any information behind it. Now whether it was true or not has not been validated. And the opinions were back then if it wasn't true she should be held accountable...same still applies.
On January 13th Representative Mikie Sherrill (NJ-11) led over 30 Members of Congress in requesting an investigation from the Acting House Sergeant at Arms, Acting Senate Sergeant at Arms, and United States Capitol Police into the suspicious behavior and access given to visitors to the Capitol Complex on Tuesday, January 5, 2021 - the day before the attacks on the Capitol.

The link to the press release - https://sherrill.house.gov/media/pr...ing-investigation-suspicious-activity-capitol

The full text of the letter can be found here:

 
  • Like
Reactions: Bobbie Solo
On January 13th Representative Mikie Sherrill (NJ-11) led over 30 Members of Congress in requesting an investigation from the Acting House Sergeant at Arms, Acting Senate Sergeant at Arms, and United States Capitol Police into the suspicious behavior and access given to visitors to the Capitol Complex on Tuesday, January 5, 2021 - the day before the attacks on the Capitol.

The link to the press release - https://sherrill.house.gov/media/pr...ing-investigation-suspicious-activity-capitol

The full text of the letter can be found here:

Another solo thumbs up
Good for you
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT