ADVERTISEMENT

The Maryland Dad

I never said I was OK with it and said multiple times he should comply with the order. I think the polls are reflecting that more than anything else.
You believe dems are losing the PR fight in light of polling showing that this is the worst current issue for Trump?
ok...
maybe both sides are facilitating demise
 
maybe both sides are facilitating demise
The more of the MSM covers immigration, the better it is for Trump. It’s the major issue that he ran on, it’s the major issue Biden failed and Homan keeps delivering results.

Most importantly, it takes away airtime on tariffs and it distracts the media from covering other stories. Follow the Hegseth thread. He has already accomplished the mission at hand.
 
The polling in my opinion reflects Trump not following the order, NOT sympathy for Garcia.

Not sure why you would segregate the PR fight between Garcia as a person and Trump ignoring SCOTUS. It's the same issue.

The politics of this fight is either good or bad for dems, and good or bad for Trump.
 
The polling in my opinion reflects Trump not following the order, NOT sympathy for Garcia.
If the new york times says it about trump, it's got to be true. Where were the progressives wshen obama deported three million of them, and only thirteen percent got a court hearing. Progressives are disgusting..
 
  • Like
Reactions: shu09
If the new york times says it about trump, it's got to be true. Where were the progressives wshen obama deported three million of them, and only thirteen percent got a court hearing. Progressives are disgusting..
And this is why the MSM has little credibility.
 
If the new york times says it about trump, it's got to be true.

The polling was bad because Trump deported someone by mistake, and then said we can’t get him back, and is ignoring the Supreme Court saying we should get him back.

If you have no issue with that, you’re brainwashed.

Where were the progressives wshen obama deported three million of them

Some revisionist history here. Many dems were very critical of Obama on deportations, and the “deporter in chief” label was started by leftist groups.


and only thirteen percent got a court hearing

Citation?

Progressives are disgusting.

About as disgusting as anyone being ok with Trump ignoring SCOTUS, or don’t care that we are arresting people after their citizenship interview, or deporting a mother who has been here for years and had a child which is a US citizen receiving cancer treatment. Go after those who pose a risk and most people won’t have an issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Robot_Man
About as disgusting as anyone being ok with Trump ignoring SCOTUS, or don’t care that we are arresting people after their citizenship interview, or deporting a mother who has been here for years and had a child which is a US citizen receiving cancer treatment.
The mother was here illegally and had the option to have her child stay or go with her.
Go after those who pose a risk and most people won’t have an issue.
Speaking of showing compassion for a child with cancer…

https://news.meaww.com/fact-check-d...er-survivor-dj-daniel-at-donald-trumps-speech

Disgusting like you said….
 
The mother was here illegally and had the option to have her child stay or go with her.

Yea, just leave the 4year old on their own. Good call. Of course the child would go too… here’s the thing, when the deportations were starting you said you were in favor of going after dangerous people, and would be surprised if they go after those who pose no risk. Here we are and you don’t care at all. That’s why I tried to level set when this started. To see if there is a line where if it was crossed you would think it’s wrong. Apparently, that line was very easy to move for you.

Secure our boarders. Fine. Go after those who pose a risk. Fine. How anyone here, where our one thing in common is attending a Catholic university, can be ok deporting a mother of a child getting cancer treatment? The lack of empathy here is pathetic.

Speaking of showing compassion for a child with cancer…

https://news.meaww.com/fact-check-d...er-survivor-dj-daniel-at-donald-trumps-speech

Disgusting like you said…

That’s your comparison? Actually deporting a family compared to not cheering? Really?
Politicians getting more into the gamesmanship than humanity are pathetic. Plenty of examples on both sides for that… however, beyond a feel good round of applause, deporting a mother who posed no risk while her child is getting cancer treatment has actual consequences.
 
Yea, just leave the 4year old on their own. Good call. Of course the child would go too… here’s the thing, when the deportations were starting you said you were in favor of going after dangerous people, and would be surprised if they go after those who pose no risk. Here we are and you don’t care at all. That’s why I tried to level set when this started. To see if there is a line where if it was crossed you would think it’s wrong. Apparently, that line was very easy to move for you.

Secure our boarders. Fine. Go after those who pose a risk. Fine. How anyone here, where our one thing in common is attending a Catholic university, can be ok deporting a mother of a child getting cancer treatment? The lack of empathy here is pathetic.
Not “leaving the child on their own”. She had a choice to bring the child or have him stay with friends or family. The priority of ICE has been to go after dangerous people and the results have shown they have.

Do you know she poses no risk? Is she just a “Mom” or a “man from Maryland”? I haven’t seen any information on details of her background. Do you know if she was targeted or was it a normal ICE encounter that occurs every day?
That’s your comparison? Actually deporting a family compared to not cheering? Really?
Politicians getting more into the gamesmanship than humanity are pathetic. Plenty of examples on both sides for that… however, beyond a feel good round of applause, deporting a mother who posed no risk while her child is getting cancer treatment has actual consequences.
No one is applauding the deportation of the mother. That is the consequence of entering the country illegally. She made that decision and knew those consequences. Is ICE supposed to research every illegals backstory after arrest?
 
Not “leaving the child on their own”. She had a choice to bring the child or have him stay with friends or family. The priority of ICE has been to go after dangerous people and the results have shown they have.

Do you know she poses no risk? Is she just a “Mom” or a “man from Maryland”? I haven’t seen any information on details of her background. Do you know if she was targeted or was it a normal ICE encounter that occurs every day?

No one is applauding the deportation of the mother. That is the consequence of entering the country illegally. She made that decision and knew those consequences. Is ICE supposed to research every illegals backstory after arrest?
if only you put this much spinzone on willard never ever ever going to villanova! we might have believed you! 🤡
 
  • Haha
Reactions: sussexcopirate
https://www.newsnationnow.com/us-ne...ar-abrego-garcias-wife-restraining-order-dhs/

Restraining order filed from his wife for domestic violence as Sen. Van Holland makes the trip to El Salvador to free him….same week that Rachel Morin’s murderer is convicted….and her mother now appearing in a White House news conference.

“To have a senator from Maryland who didn't even acknowledge, or barely acknowledge, my daughter and the brutal death that she endured, leaving her five children without a mother…so that he can use my taxpayer money to fly to El Salvador to bring back someone that's not even an American citizen?" Morin told reporters Wednesday at the White House. "Why does that person have more right than I do, or my daughter or my grandchildren? I don't, I don't understand this."
I think I speak for the Constitution here as I say "so what"

And I think I speak for Trump when I say "The Constitution says that? So what?"
 
I think I speak for the Constitution here as I say "so what"

And I think I speak for Trump when I say "The Constitution says that? So what?"
Two things can be true:
- Trump is ignoring a SCOTUS order under his interpretation which we know is sketchy.
- Using Garcia as your anti-Trump immigration argument is really a dumb move.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT