Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Right, that's the key thing. If Tiny took money while he was employed by Seton Hall, then Seton hall knew because Tiny was Seton Hall.I'm more worried about Tiny being involved because he was an employee at SHU so even if Willard and Lyons didn't know he was involved he was a coach here.
The reality check is you should not jump to conclusions. Think about it, if you were an agent illegally paying a player would you want the school to know about it?
I'm more worried about Tiny being involved because he was an employee at SHU so even if Willard and Lyons didn't know he was involved he was a coach here.
Regardless, knowing or not the Hall will be penalized if this info is proven correct and the question will be to what degree.
I don't think it will come to this but can you imagine if the player who saved his job eventually became the reason he got fired?
I don't think it will come to this but can you imagine if the player who saved his job eventually became the reason he got fired?
Sterling Gibbs keeps being a POS years later. Gift that keeps on giving.
What does the image say? I still can't manage to see it.
It’s just a pic of a tweet from McManus about SHU and IW being implicated that Gibbs “liked”. Lol. I just don’t like Sterling Gibbs. At all.What does the image say? I still can't manage to see it.
I think the situations are much different. We all know Tiny was hired to bring Whitehead here. No debate of that. That's 100% within the rules and many coaches have done that. There's nothing new there. When it comes to landing a player a coach has everything to gain, I'm sure the head coach know about it. What does Willard or any head coach have to gain when it comes to a player already there receiving money. If I did something that was a fireable offense I wouldn't say hey boss guess what I have going on with an agent.It’s a dirty business. My thinking is this - I didn’t give Pitino, Pearl, Miller or any of the other coaches whose assistants were implicated the benefit of the doubt so I can’t give Willard. Hopefully I’m proved wrong.
I hope this goes beyond just one agent though. I don’t think people realize just how far reaching the corrupt world of college athletics goes.
That's why those sorts of transactions are often deals with the devil.I don't think it will come to this but can you imagine if the player who saved his job eventually became the reason he got fired?
That's why those sorts of transactions are often deals with the devil.
I think the situations are much different. We all know Tiny was hired to bring Whitehead here. No debate of that. That's 100% within the rules and many coaches have done that. There's nothing new there. When it comes to landing a player a coach has everything to gain, I'm sure the head coach know about it. What does Willard or any head coach have to gain when it comes to a player already there receiving money. If I did something that was a fireable offense I wouldn't say hey boss guess what I have going on with an agent.
Yes but right now that's far better than having concrete proof coaches were involved and could destroy future success.
They didnt know anything. and if they did they also knew it was no different than any university and nothing was likely to happen. Im still on team whitehead. Sina and gibbs transferred like 100x they had bad attitudes. regardless of what happened with IW his attitude and love for seton hall has been amazing
Team Whitehead all day. Sina and Gibbs were cry babies who couldnt accept they got over recruited. Too bad for them.
But maybe his stock is up a little bit today?It’s just a pic of a tweet from McManus about SHU and IW being implicated that Gibbs “liked”. Lol. I just don’t like Sterling Gibbs. At all.
Love IW as a player.
If you guys didn’t think the staff, including our HC, knew this was going on you are kidding yourselves. Everyone knew the deal with Tiny (and Antigua, for that matter). Why do you think Steve Lavin said no? He ends up losing his job and Willard makes several more million dollars.
It also opens up speculation around what the staff and current senior class knew about this whole Andy Miller saga.
It has often seemed that they've been distracted and going through the motions.
Maybe this is the reason?
No one is going to come out of this looking good, but IW and company looking bad doesn’t make Gibbs look any better IMO.But maybe his stock is up a little bit today?
Gibbs and Sina are not one in the same, by the way.
Here is a dumb question
Who here thinks Andy Miller is the only agent who operates like this?