thought so.Keep trolling ….
no it doesn't. frankly probably the opposite. the one is positioned to find solutions, the other just diarrheaing all over the office.When you're comparing what the candidates have posted on their website you know the candidate you want to win is in trouble. Pretty sure that means they've done a terrible job telling the people what they're for.
there's meat on this bone. not sure if you stopped reading the other link i said which is embarassing.I managed to get through page 1 of Chapter 1 before the sheer stupidity hit me right in the face.
Under "Lower Costs for Middle-Class Families", are these:
Restoring the Expanded Child Tax Credit to Up to $3,600 to Help More Than 100 Million Americans
A New $6,000 Tax Cut to Help Families Pay for the High Costs of a Child’s First Year of Life
These don't lower costs. They put more money in the hands of the chosen ones. If anything, that would most likely increase costs.
That's no different than saying tariffs would decrease costs for people.
I couldn't read any further.
he's cornered the 5th grade education cohorts for years.That Trump issues page is an abomination, but the "Free, Honest and Lawful Elections" one made me laugh out loud.
People like to get on the Harris campaign for being scant on policy specifics (not disagreeing with this), but it's not like the Trump people are doing any better here.
Login to view embedded media
Q: "How are you going to end the war in Ukraine?"
A: "Well, we're going to end the war by not being weak and not being dumb, which is what Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are. It's very simple..."
This is like how a fifth grader would respond in an argument.
Are "the chosen ones" 1) people who files taxes, and 2) have children?I managed to get through page 1 of Chapter 1 before the sheer stupidity hit me right in the face.
Under "Lower Costs for Middle-Class Families", are these:
Restoring the Expanded Child Tax Credit to Up to $3,600 to Help More Than 100 Million Americans
A New $6,000 Tax Cut to Help Families Pay for the High Costs of a Child’s First Year of Life
These don't lower costs. They put more money in the hands of the chosen ones. If anything, that would most likely increase costs.
That's no different than saying tariffs would decrease costs for people.
I couldn't read any further.
I was there for the 1st half. They were much more aggressive on offense .In fact they had two near misses one hit the goal post the other just high.I'm glad we won against a very weak Butler team. We need to keep improving, tougher competition looms on the horizon.
That's being a Seton Hall fan and reliving 2000-2001 all over again. But since then we've seen a lot of teams get really good seeds and/or make good runs in March with freshmen going to the next level. Yeah there's the occassional year it blows up in a teams face but overall I'd bet that's not even happening 2 times out of 10 when a program gets 2 McDAA's. I think the bigger question will be their physical strength. In the world of transfers everywhere you can have a team of 18 year olds going up against a team of 23-24 year olds.Big issue is can the Coach manage them. Or will they be kids with pocketful of $$ looking to the next stage.
some people here i do, others i know what they thinklol…you don’t really care what anyone thinks.
Big issue is can the Coach manage them. Or will they be kids with pocketful of $$ looking to the next stage.Who cares about football, I'm worried about their basketball team. Most of their guys did the tunnel 2 towers 5K run a couple weeks ago in NYC. To be honest they're a bunch of very nice young men talking and greeting a lot of random people. They're young, but they're big. Going to be a good test for us for sure.
Stood and talked to him and a few other players at a volleyball game a few weeks ago . He is a legit 6-8/9Yalden is 6-9 and Middleton 6-7. Those heights are legit.
Schiano was given a big contract and whatever he wanted at ru. The hire was a big mistake but nobody else really wanted the job . His resume is average at best . Failure in the NFL, at ru one big win against Louisville his first time around and some second rate bowl games. Now they are stuck with him. Eating his big state contract should not happen.RU Rah, Rah !! Hahahaha !!!!!!!!!!Is perhaps not quite the juggernaut that Politi predicted. And keep in mind no bigger booster for rehiring Schiano than Politi who advocated “give him whatever he wants” to Hobbs.
Blame Greg Schiano for Rutgers’ no-show loss to Wisconsin | Politi
Rutgers was looking for its first-ever win over Wisconsin — and a 5-1 start — on Saturday at SHI Stadium.www.nj.com