Rutgers and the Big Ten - September/November
- By Halldan1
- Treasure Trove
- 50 Replies
This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.
You're the pro system guy. You like fluoride in water because that's what the system has said for years. Doctors push drugs/vaccines because that's what the system wants and that's the system big pharma and big food have created. You probably love it.System...r and d goes to new medicines, trials etc...pharma invites docs to junkets and getaways and in return they push this onto their patients
System...r and d goes to new medicines, trials etc...pharma invites docs to junkets and getaways and in return they push this onto their patientsI think we have to make some radical changes in health. People with backgrounds in health have been leading us down the wrong path constantly. It seems we are continuously reactionary as opposed proactive. We look to solve symptoms and not prevent the problem. Most likely these experts are put in those positions to advance the money of big food and big pharma. Not for nothing doctors take less than 20 hours of nutrition over 4 years of school. It's not like they're much greater experts than anyone else.
I think we have to make some radical changes in health. People with backgrounds in health have been leading us down the wrong path constantly. It seems we are continuously reactionary as opposed proactive. We look to solve symptoms and not prevent the problem. Most likely these experts are put in those positions to advance the money of big food and big pharma. Not for nothing doctors take less than 20 hours of nutrition over 4 years of school. It's not like they're much greater experts than anyone else.His experience been in environmental law which would have made him well suited for the EPA.
Republicans at the time called him too radical for the position.
Because of how often he dives into conspiracy theories on health though, it's hard to take him seriously even though he might say some things I'd agree with against the food and pharma lobbies.
He still has the opportunity to be successful in the position, but push back would of course be expected because of his crazier health takes. I didn't think Levine was a great pick either, but at least her background was in health.
And that’s how it works. When you’re on the side of one party, you’re the enemy of the other. And when you switch so do they. Same thing with Musk and Gabbard.His experience been in environmental law which would have made him well suited for the EPA.
Republicans at the time called him too radical for the position.
He said some whacky things about the environment back then too. I don’t get it, but having the “Kennedy” name gets the public attention.Because of how often he dives into conspiracy theories on health though, it's hard to take him seriously even though he might say some things I'd agree with against the food and pharma lobbies.
He’ll get pushback and should get it. I’d like to see how he handles the grilling.He still has the opportunity to be successful in the position, but push back would of course be expected because of his crazier health takes. I didn't think Levine was a great pick either, but at least her background was in health.
Class of 26 MooreStarting to see all the commitments for next year.… Wonder which month we will hear something
Or maybe Jeff from point Pleasant a.k.a. car wash boy will have some information for us since he always seems to be in the know
https://www.politico.com/story/2008/11/rfk-jr-too-controversial-for-epa-015403
So Obama considered RFK to run the EPA….
And given his positions on the environment you would think the left would love him…lol
Let's hope so!It going to go south quickly at St. John’s. Too many egos and NIL jealousy’s.