ADVERTISEMENT

Bidunce Crime Family Thread

Of course it does. Board appointments are often strategic for specific goals.
Having the son of one of the most powerful politicians in the world? You don't think that offers them a competitive advantage on its own reputationally especially in the eyes of investors?
Not if he’s a train wreck. You think it’s impressive to have a drug addict on your board, no matter what his name is?
You're making that up. They are common for foreign business, and more so for real estate transactions like those that Archer was involved with. Not that dissimilar to the real estate shell companies under Trump's ownership.
Was the $20 million real estate transactions?
 
Not if he’s a train wreck. You think it’s impressive to have a drug addict on your board, no matter what his name is?

A drug addict? No. This isn't just some guy off the street.

The son on the VP of the United States, who worked in the Clinton Administration and as a lobbyist and was on the board for Amtrack and was in a partnership with the heir of the Heinz fortune?
Burisma was actively looking to expand around the world. You're kidding yourself if you don't see value there when pitching investments and capital raises to have the VPs son on your board.


Was the $20 million real estate transactions?

Some of it related to real estate transactions and commissions, yes.

Again, that's not to say everything Hunter did with the accounts is clean. I'm not arguing that as I wouldn't know... but I do know enough to know that the structures are not unusual.
 
A drug addict? No. This isn't just some guy off the street.
A drug addict who was a major liability for a board getting paid an insane amount of money. The jobs he had before do not matter.
The son on the VP of the United States, who worked in the Clinton Administration and as a lobbyist and was on the board for Amtrack and was in a partnership with the heir of the Heinz fortune?
Burisma was actively looking to expand around the world. You're kidding yourself if you don't see value there when pitching investments and capital raises to have the VPs son on your board.




Some of it related to real estate transactions and commissions, yes.

Again, that's not to say everything Hunter did with the accounts is clean. I'm not arguing that as I wouldn't know... but I do know enough to know that the structures are not unusual.
Highly unusual. As I said before, if you look at the combination of these things, it doesn’t pass the smell test.
 
A drug addict who was a major liability for a board getting paid an insane amount of money. The jobs he had before do not matter.

You're not being reasonable here. Archer testified that their pitch when raising capital was "the brand" and knowledge of DC. THEY believed that having the VPs son on the board was a selling point and was valuable. It doesn't matter what your, or my opinion on Hunter is.

Highly unusual.

Really not that unusual.
 
You're not being reasonable here. Archer testified that their pitch when raising capital was "the brand" and knowledge of DC. THEY believed that having the VPs son on the board was a selling point and was valuable. It doesn't matter what your, or my opinion on Hunter is.



Really not that unusual.
I’m the one not being reasonable? Lol

Keep twisting yourself into a pretzel thinking this is all very normal and common place. It’s just not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PiratePride
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT