. He obviously is not aware that the B10 is always the best conference ever, regardless of regular season or post season record.
It's shocking that no one else has decided to take the same approach.Jimmy B’s success in the tournament has been helped because teams who don’t play Cuse twice a year in Conference play have difficulty adjusting to his Zone defense .
Because he has honed it over decades. You just don’t switch to a zone one random day or season. It takes time.It's shocking that no one else has decided to take the same approach.
John Cheney was the ultimate master. He did it with less talented players than Boeheim.It's shocking that no one else has decided to take the same approach.
It doesn't take years to get right. It may take a some time, but let's be real, coaches have to spend time on defense. Players don't come into college defensive studs. You have to spend time teaching some form of defense. Why not the zone? The only reasons I can think of are you have to recruit long bodies for it and I think the bigger issue is the zone is not played in the NBA so guys with pro dreams don't want play it.Because he has honed it over decades. You just don’t switch to a zone one random day or season. It takes time.
That's definitely a part. You know what else is a part -- the guy has been an all-time coach forever. He's past his best days, but even in recent years they've had multiple Sweet 16 runs. Cuse isn't what it was and Jimmy B isn't what he was, and he was always one of the coaches in the real Big East that I tended to root against the most for various reasons, including his whiny personality. But I don't get why people here sometimes mock where Cuse presently is as a program, or suggest we surpassed them recently, because the guy has still made multiple runs in the dance recently.Jimmy B’s success in the tournament has been helped because teams who don’t play Cuse twice a year in Conference play have difficulty adjusting to his Zone defense .
He has always recruited to it. Every position. He's not a slave to it recruiting-wise, but you often see it with the length of the wings or guards (especially wings), true shot blocker in the middle, and he doesn't care much at all about having guards that can lock you down on defense individually (offensive/shooting skill and length more important).It doesn't take years to get right. It may take a some time, but let's be real, coaches have to spend time on defense. Players don't come into college defensive studs. You have to spend time teaching some form of defense. Why not the zone? The only reasons I can think of are you have to recruit long bodies for it and I think the bigger issue is the zone is not played in the NBA so guys with pro dreams don't want play it.
I have tremendous respect for what John Chaney accomplished at a school with fewer resources than we have -- especially relative to the competition. But he is the antithesis of Boeheim in this regard.John Cheney was the ultimate master. He did it with less talented players than Boeheim.
This. He believes in it, recruits to it, has been doing it for decades. Most coaches just do not believe in the zone - especially now with player movement - so they don't spend this kind of time on it other than a switch defense.Because he has honed it over decades. You just don’t switch to a zone one random day or season. It takes time.
Ummm yeah—it’s just a bit easier to win sweet 16 and elite 8 games when you have NBA talent on your roster making shots. Chaney’s teams were always in it down to the wire, but they couldn’t convert on the offensive endI have tremendous respect for what John Chaney accomplished at a school with fewer resources than we have -- especially relative to the competition. But he is the antithesis of Boeheim in this regard.
Chaney won big in the regular season and then watched his team wash out in the tourney. He and I have coached in the same number of Final Fours. Boeheim, at least in his old age, has made a living ambushing good teams with that zone in the tournament.