Wait—so let me get this straight:This idea about familiarity vs teams not knowing you is really BS. This is not a just shu thing. You watch advanced scouting tape you see what teams do, dont do, their strengths and weaknesses.
The idea that things would have been better because shu gets away from league teams I don't necessarily agree with.
I do agree that there was a potential along with 11 to 13 other teams to have a special, deep run.
Good mid major coaching staffs would have their team ready vs high major and better seeded teams.
I did feel SHU would have been enough to make it past Albany weekend. MSG was no lock.
I almost feel they kinds needed BET to get some mojo back. They would have had Marquette. You beat the same school 3 times in a season its a feat because very hard to do.
However as stated above, there was nothing good about the last week of the season.
Familiarity with a team is over rated. But beating a team 3x in one season is very hard to do? Because 3x in one season is essentially about familiarity.
Aren’t they both axioms and built on theories that seem to be overwrought in fandom?
You’re saying two times against a team means nothing, but 3 times—3 times—well that’s a whole different ballgame.
Comical.