Thought this was interesting. The top tier of the Big 12 has an average Ncsos of 248. They all blew out the lower tier teams and going into the big 12 have very high net scores. If net stay's around this maybe a viable strategy. I think it’s important to test your team as a litmus test. This year our team took awhile to gel and we way under performed. With many new pieces that is always a risk. If the team we have now replaced that same schedule I think we would have over perform.
Interesting stat on NCSOS
- Thread starter P615007
- Start date
Flip out some of our losses with routs over weak teams and the efficiencies would look better, NET and KP would be higher, but the resume would still be lacking any notable win.
Everyone sees what they’re doing but did those teams also cash in with a quality win or two in the fewer opportunities to do so?
Everyone sees what they’re doing but did those teams also cash in with a quality win or two in the fewer opportunities to do so?
Let us play the most inefficient game possible tomorrow night and win!
Divide ncsos by rpi. Take the sum and multiply by net. Cube that result, add in the defensive efficiencies for conference away games, get the result and stick it where the sun dont shine...lol
Divide ncsos by rpi. Take the sum and multiply by net. Cube that result, add in the defensive efficiencies for conference away games, get the result and stick it where the sun dont shine...lol
