Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Arguing point 1)Our recruiting strategy should not be "let's sit tight and hope somebody gets homesick."
Transfers are an important piece to the puzzle but your meat and potatoes needs to be 4 year players, and the staff needs to be able to recruit talented HS seniors if they want to be successful long term.
A couple of the main reasons I'm not a huge fan of transfers:
1) During their sit out year they eat up a scholarship and all you get is a practice player.
2) Often come with baggage. The vast majority of our transfers have been headaches - Herb Pope, Keon Lawrence, Sterling Gibbs, Stix Mitchell, Jeff Robinson, Jevon Thomas.
End this thread, start a new thread for recruits that want to play at Seton Hall University.
And therefore KW gets a solid F for the recruiting class so far. Forget TT and the sit outs, I'm talking about what the recruiting budget is primarily used for.I think we were a real player with King which is why this is disappointing. Also, the staff did have a plan B, C, and D the problem is that we missed on A, B, C, D.
Any word from Jerry Lucas on his thoughts on who SH should be targeting?End this thread, start a new thread for recruits that want to play at Seton Hall University.
And therefore KW gets a solid F for the recruiting class so far. Forget TT and the sit outs, I'm talking about what the recruiting budget is primarily used for.
This one more than any other in the past was our best chance to reel in a 5 star. We got Whitehead but I'm talking about near misses.
Who's almost always the lead recruiter.Who was the lead recruiter for King?
Dan I used to agree but I'm not sure if I buy that anymore. We all read the quotes from the players and parents that seton hall (shaheen) is such a great recruiter, but like u said he has literally nothing to show for it. Ever. how does an elite recruiter literally produce average to below average results year after year. It's bizarre. Is it ultimately the head coaches inability to close? Is it the lack of facilities? Is it that we can't afford to pay what P5 schools can? Tommy amaker was able to recruit at an elite level here and back then our facilities were pathetic. I still want to believe sha is a great recruiter but eventually you have to look at his record and judge him by results.Who's almost always the lead recruiter.
Gotta feel for Sha. He works so hard with so little to show for it.
If he was a coach at a FB school I shudder to think what he could do.
i could have had the same results recruiting these guys.
i dont know any assistant coaches on any other team. jus ttheir head coach. top dog is all that counts. you dont play for the assistant coach.
All about top dog. Tell me otherwisewow because you don't know the assistant coaches on any other team, assistants don't matter in recruiting. That might be the most idiotic logic on this board ever. And that's saying something. Impressive job.
All about top dog. Tell me otherwise
Then why is there even a thread to hire Mike Rice? Here's the answer....Because assistants make a difference. Their connections matter. For the longest time on here there were discussions Willard only got the players because of his assistants. Now it's all about top dog?
Do you really think the head coach is closing the deal? Or is it the side deals like getting a family member a modeling contract the deal closer. Or the bags of money that show up. 90% of the 30 for 30s that deal with college athletics get into how ugly recruiting is. And it's not the head coaches doing the dirty stuff. It's the alums and boosters doing the dirty work for the coach.It takes both for us to be successful in our recruiting.The assistants to identify the talent and get the kids to consider our program and the head coach to close the deal.if you don't have assistants who can get you to make your pitch you're not going to succeed. If you don't have a head coach who can close then you can't succeed either.
hiring for a player is a different story but the top dog has to closeThen why is there even a thread to hire Mike Rice? Here's the answer....Because assistants make a difference. Their connections matter. For the longest time on here there were discussions Willard only got the players because of his assistants. Now it's all about top dog?
so why is Nike so interested on where a kid goes to college? if they were that interested they would start at the youngest level and have entire top 100 at nike schools if they wanted to. I have a hard time wrapping my head around corporate Nike in a meeting saying "we need king to go to oregon"
Interesting that RJ Barrett has Oregon on his top three list (along with Duke and Kentucky). Rivals has Barrett listed as a SG. I think he will play WF. King could very well have competition for PT from the get go.
It took a lot to get Altman to leave Creighton.Amazing how Oregon has become such a force in BB and FB.
Money talks and they have one of the biggest boosters in all of college sports.
Is that just your opinion or have you read that somewhere? Barrett seems like the ultimate slasher/scorer/finisher wing-player.Barrett will probably be a PG.