ADVERTISEMENT

NCAA proposes rule to let schools, athletes enter NIL deals

Halldan1

Moderator
Moderator
Jan 1, 2003
186,663
100,547
113

NCAA president Charlie Baker proposed rule changes Tuesday that would allow Division I schools for the first time to pay their athletes in ways that are not tied to educational resources.

Baker shared the proposed changes in a letter sent to member schools. If Division I schools choose to adopt the rules, they would be allowed to enter into name, image and likeness deals directly with their athletes. The new rules would also create a trust fund for athletes at the richest tier of athletic departments and allow those schools to create its own set of rules for recruiting, transfers, roster size and a wide range of other policies.

"t is time for us -- the NCAA -- to offer our own forward-looking framework," Baker said. "This framework must sustain the best elements of the student-athlete experience for all student-athletes, build on the financial and organizational investments that have positively changed the trajectory of women's sports, and enhance the athletic and academic experience for student-athletes who attend the highest resourced colleges and universities."

The policy would bring a major change to the foundational tenet of NCAA's long-held business model that prevented schools from providing any non-academic-based compensation to athletes. Baker's letter said the change is necessary during a time when the revenue generated by top colleges is poised to grow significantly, and the legal pressure to compensate athletes continues to mount.

He wrote the new policy would help gender equity by demanding that schools provide equal NIL investments for their men's and women's teams on campus. The proposed new model would require the top tier of schools to set aside at least $30,000 per year for at least half of its athletes in "an enhanced educational trust fund."

The letter doesn't define a line for which schools would fall in that top-earning subdivision, but instead says the new framework would give schools the option to decide. The top schools, which according to letter are more impacted "by collectives, the Transfer Portal and NIL," would be allowed to create their own set of rules to help police those areas of the market for college athletes in unique ways.


Baker said in the letter that these new rules will help provide a model to show to Congress in the NCAA's ongoing quest for new federal laws to help in governing college sports. Baker and other NCAA leaders have been asking Congress for three years to create a law that would allow them to keep college athletes from becoming employees, create uniform rules for NIL deals and avoid future antitrust lawsuits. Those efforts have so far failed to gain significant momentum, with several key lawmakers telling the institutions that they need to make efforts to solve their own problems before the government intervenes.

Baker, who took over as the NCAA president in March, has said multiple times during his tenure that he believes the highest-earning echelon of college sports operates in a different reality than the overwhelming majority of NCAA schools.

"[This proposal] kick-starts a long-overdue conversation among the membership that focuses on the differences that exist between schools, conferences and divisions and how to create more permissive and flexible rules across the NCAA that put student-athletes first," he said. "Colleges and universities need to be more flexible, and the NCAA needs to be more flexible, too."

The letter did not provide a timeframe for when these proposals would be fleshed out. NCAA schools would have to vote to adopt the changes. Those stakeholders next meet in January in Phoenix at their annual convention.
 
dirt-grave.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bobbie Solo
Amateurism…. Farewell, Sweet Prince. They milked that for so long.
 
Can't remember from whom but I read a good suggestion the other day that could really calm things down.

Transfers not eligible for NIL $.
 
Charlie is going all in. I think he has figured out where his bread is buttered. This will continue to be better for the big state schools.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jack 1970
You think this is going to work if you have to pay equal funds to female athletes as well?
This was my initial takeaway too. How could football schools justifiably offset the millions in football payroll?

Even at Seton Hall's level - hypothetically, what would happen in a scenario where Eddie Griffin and Andre Barrett committed to Seton Hall at a combined $1.2M salary? Would the school have to blindly overpay someone else to offset?

Unless I'm missing something - now players' NIL value will be determined/impacted by someone of the opposite gender's NIL value. Huh?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SHUisNJsTeam
Just recruit Olivia Dunn, Paige Becker or Catlin Clark.
I love college sports but it’s time to stop pretending this is amateur sports. If you want to continue down this path let’s call it like it is and declare them professionals and put real guardrails in place. If you don’t want to do that than remove the TV money and call it true amateur sports.
 
Is this the move to separate the men from the boys? The schools that want to be all in forcing some schools to jump out of the madness? Should be interesting to see what if anything passes and what the ramifications are.
 
You think this is going to work if you have to pay equal funds to female athletes as well?
That's the great equalizer. It's effectively a luxury tax forcing the schools trying to buy championships to pay double for the 5* players that they're already massively overpaying.
 
You think this is going to work if you have to pay equal funds to female athletes as well?

You think this is going to work if you have to pay equal funds to female athletes as well?
Maybe the loophole is....this says the schools can pay their athletes...but it doesnt rule out collectives, etc. And it says that the amount the schools pay has to be the same for women and men sports.

So perhaps the thinking is that the "delta" that goes to the money making sports, ie football, can be made up by the collectives...

So, the school pays some amount that they determine to all athletes per some formula that meets this equality standard...then the collective kicks in the extra million for the star QB.

I dont know...but the whole "leave it to the individual schools to basically make the rules" is Armageddon at its best.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Section112
This may lead to a decrease in athletic teams at smaller universities. A school keeps their revenue producing teams only and dump the rest. Perhaps a school keeps men and women's basketball only, this means they have to feed 50% of 26 athletes. $30K times 13 athletes requires just $390,000 to feed the fund. Imagine the cost savings and funds left over to feed your 26 athletes.

This may not be possible if the NCAA requires member schools to have a minimum number of sports.
 
Last thing the NCAA needs is a politician running the organization.One politician making a recommendation to 500 politicians.God save us!Will be a lot of collateral damage if they get their way.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT