Originally posted by donnie_baseball:
Originally posted by hallgrad80:
I guess I can understand why Hobbs was picked to be
the public spokesman . He's gone from SH in a couple of months so if there's negative blowback he won't have to respond in any official capacity; he hired Willard so he can defend his being the spokesperson not Lyons ; it allows Lyons to distance himself from the first public statement on Kevin's status ; and it leaves Lyons free to keep his position on keeping or replacing Kevin private.
There is however one serious issue that I see and that is who the right person at SH should be to speak to the issue of Kevin's status and it should not be the retiring law school dean. If it's not going to be the school's president, the chairman of the BOR , the chairman of the BOR's athletic committee then it should be the AD . Look at who is defending the retention of their coaches at Indiana and Oklahoma. State, it's the school's AD not a dean of their school of agriculture. The bigger question in my mind is just what authority Lyons has over the men's basketball program when it comes to issues like the way is being run by the head coach and evaluating the head coach's performance.
That, and somehow, Hobbs actually believes it. From my vantage point behind the bench, when the players came off for the last TV timeout of the 2nd half, clearly defeated in body language and by the scoreboard, Hobbs was the only one out of his seat, clapping, as if some great effort had been put forth.