Talk about nonsense. You're so full of it.
Gonna bookmark this one for November 4th.
Talk about nonsense. You're so full of it.
Gonna bookmark this one for November 4th.
Nothing is insurmountable, I agree with you there, anything can be done (especially this) if given enough time and effort.
But are the states preparing? Will they prepare now, is there money in their budgets to make changes at this point? I do not see the federal government funding this or taking the lead. We are less than 3 months out from election day, and even less to sending/printing ballots, hiring more staff and whatever other things need to be done.
In the end, 95% of states can implement and do it perfectly, only takes a disaster in 1 or 2 key states and it throws the whole process into question, even possibly causing people to question states that handled the process well.
If like normal, I have no problem with people worried about or unable to go to polls to request mail in ballot (and obviously numbers will increase this year), but I feel in person polls should be open.
Tell me how a lot of society is going to handle it if we have to wait for results or if the Supreme Court decides the winner?
So looks like we agree.Agree with all of that.
Polls should be open. Mail in ballots should be available to those who want them, just as they would in almost any state normally without any excuse.
Plan for more mail in ballots than normal.
The part I was objecting to really was the idea that we can't do it because of fraud.
We have had hundreds of millions of mail in ballots with a few hundred instances of fraud ever.
Just Ironic that the person worried about a minuscule amount of fraud is also the least concerned about the hundreds of thousands of deaths from a pandemic. Bit of a disconnect there in my opinion.
Agree with all of that.
Polls should be open. Mail in ballots should be available to those who want them, just as they would in almost any state normally without any excuse.
Plan for more mail in ballots than normal.
The part I was objecting to really was the idea that we can't do it because of fraud.
We have had hundreds of millions of mail in ballots with a few hundred instances of fraud ever.
Just Ironic that the person worried about a minuscule amount of fraud is also the least concerned about the hundreds of thousands of deaths from a pandemic. Bit of a disconnect there in my opinion.
So looks like we agree.
I dont like to speak for others, but the person you referenced I took to mean he was against complete mail in elections like NY/NJ did for their primaries, which seems to be the same as you are advocating..
Yes, I'm not concerned about it because any illness could kill most of the people who are dying from this. If we had a virus running through the country that killed people regardless of age, then I'd be concerned.
Going to have to disagree with your statement, right here in good old Paterson NJ in recent mail in election.More people under 45 have died from Covid in the last 4 months than all instances of mail in voter fraud ever.
More people under 45 have died from Covid in the last 4 months than all instances of mail in voter fraud ever.
More people under 45 have died from Covid in the last 4 months than all instances of mail in voter fraud ever.
I am sure some people have bled out from paper cuts.
From numbers I saw in the recent elections that were all mail in, the numbers of voters mailing in ballots was similar to elections that were in person. Not sure if that was across the board, but don’t think an all mail in election will lead to many more people voting.doesnt only 50% of eligible voters actually show up to vote? this clearly seems like whoever is against mail-in voting is afraid those remaining 50% are gonna do some damage. Like someone who uses hate and divisiveness to bring people out to vote, while less obnoxious candidates lose their votes to apathy. if all of the apathetic people can now vote then the entire strategy of inciting people is all for nothing.
doesnt only 50% of eligible voters actually show up to vote? this clearly seems like whoever is against mail-in voting is afraid those remaining 50% are gonna do some damage. Like someone who uses hate and divisiveness to bring people out to vote, while less obnoxious candidates lose their votes to apathy. if all of the apathetic people can now vote then the entire strategy of inciting people is all for nothing.
the rioting will hit critical mass when the minny officer is acquitted (perhaps rightfully) and if trump wins. cities are gonna have a hard time.Good posts. Hoping for 100% mail in voting, then. To the other sub-point on this thread, if Trump wins again, there will be rioting. There's already rioting, and I expect MSM and the leaders of these cities, who have been complicit in the lawlessness, to fan the flames.
Any president deserves respect. He earned it an election. Don’t get bent out of shape because l you disagree with him or think he’s a jerk which he is. We’ve had plenty of jerks (Clinton) and plenty of nice guys (Bush 41, Carter). All deserve and earned respect.Nysg service has nothing to do with it. Trump is a rich boy whose dad pulled strings to get out of the war. He practically bragged about it. He is a lowlife dope and he does not deserve your respect. He is everything lot's of us don't respect. But he runs under the repub ticket, and even though he is ruining the party, maybe the country, the lemmings don't care.
eh. just because he got voted in an office (not by majority) doesnt mean he automatically commands respect. you gotta give respect to get respect. i used to defend the guy because i think he was facing too much attack but after 4 years i can easily say i have no respect for that man. hes clearly not a good hearted person. doesnt mean i think hes 100% the worst option. i just dont respect him.Any president deserves respect. He earned it an election. Don’t get bent out of shape because l you disagree with him or think he’s a jerk which he is. We’ve had plenty of jerks (Clinton) and plenty of nice guys (Bush 41, Carter). All deserve and earned respect.
How about this?I have no problem with mail-in voting provided you request a ballot, mailing a ballot to all is ripe for fraud and manipulation.
How about this?
Good old Murphy coming through again, closing polls in November going all mail in ballots. Next up closing schools.Agree with all of that.
Polls should be open. Mail in ballots should be available to those who want them, just as they would in almost any state normally without any excuse.
Plan for more mail in ballots than normal.
The part I was objecting to really was the idea that we can't do it because of fraud.
We have had hundreds of millions of mail in ballots with a few hundred instances of fraud ever.
Just Ironic that the person worried about a minuscule amount of fraud is also the least concerned about the hundreds of thousands of deaths from a pandemic. Bit of a disconnect there in my opinion.
Good old Murphy coming through again, closing polls in November going all mail in ballots. Next up closing schools.
https://www.nj.com/coronavirus/2020...o-be-mostly-mail-in-murphy-will-announce.html
I haven't been to a voting booth in over 6 years. I don't see how you can have people maintain social distancing and wait in line for hours to vote. In a lot of states people wait hours to vote during normal times. This would be exacerbated by 2 or 3 fold. How are you going to accomplish that during the pandemic?I’ll wait until the announcement. Saw a bunch of rumors he would be cancelling school on Twitter last week as well. So I’m not sure it’s true yet.
That said, it’s a mistake if he goes that route.
We should be able to vote in person and allow mail in for those who request a ballot.
I haven't been to a voting booth in over 6 years. I don't see how you can have people maintain social distancing and wait in line for hours to vote. In a lot of states people wait hours to vote during normal times. This would be exacerbated by 2 or 3 fold. How are you going to accomplish that during the pandemic?
The only other option is by opening up voting for a week maybe two. Based upon geographical boundaries, you would be assigned a day of the week to vote. Unless, that is done, mail-in is your only option.
Closing polls is so groups can assist people who wouldn’t otherwise vote, vote by mail. Democrats should come clean with that explanation and then we can debate the issue.Good old Murphy coming through again, closing polls in November going all mail in ballots. Next up closing schools.
https://www.nj.com/coronavirus/2020...o-be-mostly-mail-in-murphy-will-announce.html
Closing polls is so groups can assist people who wouldn’t otherwise vote, vote by mail. Democrats should come clean with that explanation and then we can debate the issue.
Closing polls is so groups can assist people who wouldn’t otherwise vote, vote by mail. Democrats should come clean with that explanation and then we can debate the issue.
In areas where there are always lines, they should be promoting mail in voting or early voting.
I’ll wait until the announcement. Saw a bunch of rumors he would be cancelling school on Twitter last week as well. So I’m not sure it’s true yet.
That said, it’s a mistake if he goes that route.
We should be able to vote in person and allow mail in for those who request a ballot.
I have never waited more than a few people in line. NJ is pretty good, lines are usually not an issue, even in the cities, unless there is some issue.I haven't been to a voting booth in over 6 years. I don't see how you can have people maintain social distancing and wait in line for hours to vote. In a lot of states people wait hours to vote during normal times. This would be exacerbated by 2 or 3 fold. How are you going to accomplish that during the pandemic?
The only other option is by opening up voting for a week maybe two. Based upon geographical boundaries, you would be assigned a day of the week to vote. Unless, that is done, mail-in is your only option.
I have never waited more than a few people in line. NJ is pretty good, lines are usually not an issue, even in the cities, unless there is some issue.
Why couldn't you social distance in line, the lines are almost always outside, if wearing a mask and keep separate how is it any different than lines at currently open amusement parks.
And if not comfortable with lines, going to polls or this process during a pandemic, as normal you should/can request a mail in ballot.
Or figure out ways to make it go quicker and smoother.
I have never waited more than a few people in line. NJ is pretty good, lines are usually not an issue, even in the cities, unless there is some issue.
Why couldn't you social distance in line, the lines are almost always outside, if wearing a mask and keep separate how is it any different than lines at currently open amusement parks.
And if not comfortable with lines, going to polls or this process during a pandemic, as normal you should/can request a mail in ballot.
Okay, but is it the government job to help lazy people?Agreed.
I assume that there is a fear that there will be a decent amount of voters who do not want to vote in person and want to vote by mail but would not take the time to request a ballot.
May be other possible issues, but if the main factor is to allow lazy people from having to request a mail in ballot, this is way off the mark?
Agree but you can’t go forward with what Democrats want. any reasonable opponent would challenge the result which is bad for the US but then again the dems will look good in the end if no fraud is uncoveredAgreed.
I assume that there is a fear that there will be a decent amount of voters who do not want to vote in person and want to vote by mail but would not take the time to request a ballot.
i don’t think voting should be driven by grassroots groups who pool people to make sure they mail in a specific vote. it’s akin to intimidation at the polls. request mail in and receive, or go to the poll; I’m in favor of having polls open for a few daysI don't think they are hiding that they want to expand the voting base to people who don't normally vote. Democrats will do better if they get more people to vote.
If the non-voting block becomes generally more conservative, democrats will start to fight against expanding voting and republicans will fight for it.
I thought that Murphy was doing mail in voting because Trump was opposed to it. Oh wait, that is probably what is the closest to the truth.I'm just giving you my opinion as to why they would be doing this outside of what anyone will actually say.
But, I can certainly make an argument that increasing participation in democracy is a good thing and mailing a ballot to all registered voters (as several states already do) is a good thing.
I thought that Murphy was doing mail in voting because Trump was opposed to it. Oh wait, that is probably what is the closest to the truth.
Just like I am not in favor of Trump or Republicans from changing the rules or making it easier or harder for people to vote, I am not in favor of the governor ruling on his own to change things. If NJ legislature wants to adjust the states election laws, then they should do it - now or in future.
On the other hand... Trump will try to take the country down with him intentionally.
Talk about nonsense. You're so full of it.
Gonna bookmark this one for November 4th.