ADVERTISEMENT

This guy was a leader of young men at multiple programs

so you're saying you hit your kids with a belt?
I'm not condoning hitting anyone with a belt, I was never hit with a belt although I will say the fear of the belt was good deterrent in my my life. Maybe you were a better kid than I was, you probably were, but the fear of a timeout, wouldn't have set me on the right path one bit. I'll bet these pills are linked to deaths (suicides) a lot more than any belts were. So I'll return the question to you, you're ok with giving your kids pills that could lead to suicide?
 
Last edited:
I'm not condoning hitting anyone with a belt, I was never hit with a belt although I will say the fear of the belt was good deterrent in my my life. Maybe you were a better kid than I was, you probably were, but the fear of a timeout, wouldn't have set me on the right path one bit. I'll bet these pills are linked to deaths (suicides) a lot more than any belts were. So I'll return the question to you, you're ok with giving your kids pills that could lead to suicide?
1) parental abuse has led to more suicides than adderall absolutely yes
2) prescription medicine should only be used as advised and under doctor supervision so it can be stopped at the first sign of adverse reaction. are they overprescribed? yeah sure probably. beating up your kids is not the answer to that as much as you'd like it to be
 
  • Like
Reactions: Merge
I'll bet these pills are linked to deaths (suicides) a lot more than any belts were. So I'll return the question to you, you're ok with giving your kids pills that could lead to suicide?

Teen suicide rates were decreasing as children started to be prescribed more antidepressants, and stimulants for ADHD in the 18-'s and 90's. Suicides started increasing in the 2000's which is more in line with the internet boom than pills.
 
  • Like
Reactions: itsacurse
1) parental abuse has led to more suicides than adderall absolutely yes
2) prescription medicine should only be used as advised and under doctor supervision so it can be stopped at the first sign of adverse reaction. are they overprescribed? yeah sure probably. beating up your kids is not the answer to that as much as you'd like it to be
1) Amazing how you group all parental abuse, but only take 1 pill. I'll stick with the stance that adderall has killed more than any belt has. Or if you want to make it all inclusive, pills have killed more than parental abuse, but stop with this all parent abuse vs 1 pill comparison.

2) Where did I say beating up your kids is the answer. You're good at putting words into peoples mouths. Pills should be used under a doctor supervision, but even under supervision, they still have the risk. Adderall has these risks. restleness, difficulty sleeping, headaches, dizziness, visual changes, alteration in sexual performance, constipation, diarrhea, nausae, vomiting, hallucinations, paranoia exacerbation of existing mental illness, excessive body temperature, heart attack, stroke, damage to nerve cells, seizures, psychosis, and abnoral heart rhythms. Sign your kid up for those risks.
 
1) Amazing how you group all parental abuse, but only take 1 pill. I'll stick with the stance that adderall has killed more than any belt has. Or if you want to make it all inclusive, pills have killed more than parental abuse, but stop with this all parent abuse vs 1 pill comparison.

2) Where did I say beating up your kids is the answer. You're good at putting words into peoples mouths. Pills should be used under a doctor supervision, but even under supervision, they still have the risk. Adderall has these risks. restleness, difficulty sleeping, headaches, dizziness, visual changes, alteration in sexual performance, constipation, diarrhea, nausae, vomiting, hallucinations, paranoia exacerbation of existing mental illness, excessive body temperature, heart attack, stroke, damage to nerve cells, seizures, psychosis, and abnoral heart rhythms. Sign your kid up for those risks.
"my 10 year old might get erectile dysfunction, i better beat him to within an inch of his life" -- SHUHoopsFan
 
"my 10 year old might get erectile dysfunction, i better beat him to within an inch of his life" -- SHUHoopsFan
You can't discuss the topic so you make up the most bizarre comparison you could come up with. I could do the same thing and it just turns into I know you are but what am I.

"I'd rather my 10 year old die of a heart attack than threaten him with a belt" - Itsacurse
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shaheton
You can't discuss the topic so you make up the most bizarre comparison you could come up with. I could do the same thing and it just turns into I know you are but what am I.

"I'd rather my 10 year old die of a heart attack than threaten him with a belt" - Itsacurse
yeah i agree i would never beat my child. apparently you think it's good? sick
 
- I never got a beating or spanked, but seeing my dad remove his belt was all I needed to see. I don’t condone hitting children obviously but however you do it, they should know the consequences.
- There are extremes on both sides. Child abuse and over prescribing of medication‘s.
- Smartphones and social media. The worst and parental control has been terrible as well.
- And let’s not forget diet. Ultra processed foods, obesity and poor diet. We would be naïve to think this hasn’t had a significant effect.

If you’re doing your job as a parent, you’re vigilant about all four.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Shaheton
You agree you'd rather your kid have a heart attack than threaten him?
the risk of my kid getting a heart attack from ADHD medicine is effectively zero, way less than say, getting in a bus accident on the way to school, or slipping on ice and hitting his head. This is what everyone on earth calls "acceptable risk" i.e. getting out of bed in the morning creates the risk of dying. But again your answer to this is apparently terrorizing children and whipping them with your belt every day of their lives. That gets a no from me.
 
the risk of my kid getting a heart attack from ADHD medicine is effectively zero, way less than say, getting in a bus accident on the way to school, or slipping on ice and hitting his head. This is what everyone on earth calls "acceptable risk" i.e. getting out of bed in the morning creates the risk of dying. But again your answer to this is apparently terrorizing children and whipping them with your belt every day of their lives. That gets a no from me.
Show me the text I said it's good to beat your kid with a belt. I would love to see it.

But if you want to have a real conversation, ADHD stimulants may be low risk of heart attack but they do damage the heart.

Acceptable risk is a heart attack? No that shouldn't be acceptable risk. No child should have to take on that risk from a drug. Let's cure the problem, not the symptoms of the problem and the child won't need acceptable risk of a heart attack. Only in America is that acceptable risk. The rest of the developed world, wouldn't accept that, just like they don't accept so many of the ingredients in our food.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Shaheton
Show me the text I said it's good to beat your kid with a belt. I would love to see it.

But if you want to have a real conversation, ADHD stimulants may be low risk of heart attack but they do damage the heart.

Acceptable risk is a heart attack? No that shouldn't be acceptable risk. No child should have to take on that risk from a drug. Let's cure the problem, not the symptoms of the problem and the child won't need acceptable risk of a heart attack. Only in America is that acceptable risk. The rest of the developed world, wouldn't accept that, just like they don't accept so many of the ingredients in our food.
drugs help people when they aren't abused. beating children hurts children. i know which side i'm on
 
drugs help people when they aren't abused. beating children hurts children. i know which side i'm on
Do you really think drugs don't do harm, even when not abused? Main you're brainwashed.

Still waiting for you to show me where I said beating children is a good thing.
 
Shaheton are you confusing Trump and Biden.Biden is the career politician on the public payroll for 50 years Trump as president is his first political office ?
 
Do you really think drugs don't do harm, even when not abused? Main you're brainwashed.

Still waiting for you to show me where I said beating children is a good thing.

Probably because you only went after the idea of pills not addressing the issue, as if to suggest that a belt would be addressing the issue, though that's likely not what you intended.
 
Probably because you only went after the idea of pills not addressing the issue, as if to suggest that a belt would be addressing the issue, though that's likely not what you intended.
I think the belt comment by the pol was kinda a colloquial reference

He wasn’t saying just belt kids, so easy with the disgust at his comment

he just meant we dealt with things different before, now its oftentimes dealt with by prescribing meds

Neither side is 100% right or 100% wrong here imo

Tweeter got his responses
 
  • Like
Reactions: HALL85
Probably because you only went after the idea of pills not addressing the issue, as if to suggest that a belt would be addressing the issue, though that's likely not what you intended.
I never said pills don't address the issue, I said the pills are more likely to cause death than the threat of a belt And for the record Tubervile never said parents beat their kids with the belt, like many families I know the belts got taken out, not used. It was pretty common 50+ years ago. Then the idiot decided to make it parental abuse in general causes more deaths than 1 pill adderall. What a great comparison.
 
Last edited:
Your work tends to be subtle but the payoff is there for those who look.
Haha
Sorry
I don’t take stuff all that serious

I appreciate peeps’ opinions here even your ultra left ones and I save Room on my phone memory by not having to get twitter thanks to tweeter the repeater
 
  • Haha
Reactions: HALL85
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT