So because people didn’t immediately condemn it to your liking, that means they are condoning it. Got it.
Will Biden And Schumer Now Condemn Protests At Justices Homes
- Thread starter ed odowd
- Start date
As someone who is looking to run for President, it is expected that Trump or any person like that in leadership would condemn the attack. By not doing so, that is tacit approval of what was done in this attack and what makes Trump so dangerous. After another day, he will end up doing a half hearted condemnation but the signal was sent that he approved of it. That’s his Modus Operandi.
Nobody has commented that the guy talking low IQ can't spell ridiculous? Maybe I'm the only one who got a kick out of reading that.
A
anon_ezos2e9wn1ob0
Guest
Thanks for spellcheck.. I post from my phone, must of fat fingered it. No actual comment on the attack Mr. tic tac toe?
Last edited by a moderator:
I’ll give the same response Nancy gave when Kavanaugh had a guy try to kill him….he’s got protection. Instead of condemning it, cooling things down, essentially no big deal, he’s got protection.
I’m sure the Pelosi’s can afford protection so they probably see it as no big deal. Nobody ever looks at their side and tries to cool their side down but they want the other side to cool down. That’s gotten us to where we are. I’d rather see this happen to politicians families than innocent small business owners like in 2020. Maybe the politicians will do something when it happens to them.
At least put it in context.
She was asked a question specifically about the security bill, which the house passed 3 days later after modifying the bill to include families as well. Her point was that not passing the bill before the weekend would not put the justices at risk since they were under constant protection since the leak of the opinion overturning Roe.
She was not saying that an attempt on a court justice was not a big deal because he has protection.
That’s not the context at all. She was done with her conference walking away when a reporter shouted at her that she said justices were protected but BK faced an assassination attempt. Her response was And he’s protected.
Her conference where she was asked about the bill specifically... Just watch the video.
House won't vote this week on plan to boost Supreme Court security
The delay comes as Senate GOP leaders blanch at proposed additions that would extend protection to clerks.
www.politico.com
Based on your logic and lack of condemnation on your part would imply that you approve of the attack.
I am sure that's not the case but to imply that not condemning it equates to approval is ridiculous.
This was a heinous act committed by a mentally disturbed individual.
Sad that your first reaction is Trump. Your twisted obsession with Trump is obvious.
Content. Nothing to calm down the rhetoric. She won’t tell anyone on the left to calm down. He has protection.Her conference where she was asked about the bill specifically... Just watch the video.
House won't vote this week on plan to boost Supreme Court security
The delay comes as Senate GOP leaders blanch at proposed additions that would extend protection to clerks.
Is your head up your ass or are you just willfully blind? If you haven’t noticed, I am not a candidate or potential candidate for President. Trump will be unless he is indicted.
It is a matter of respect, common decency that anyone in his position to condemn the attack. Like it would be to condemn the attack on the Capitol. However, he doesn’t And when or if he does, he does it is some half attempt which signals to others that it was approved or ok by Trump.
DePape is mentally ill. So are most people who do violent acts. It is when you combine that vulnerability with this horrendous political vitriol that you get things like this happening.
You even have Donald Trump Jr out there making fun of the attack.
Donald Trump Jr. shares hammer Halloween photo mocking Paul Pelosi attack
Donald Trump Jr. praised the internet for making jokes at the expense of Paul Pelosi following the attack he suffered on Friday.
www.newsweek.com
There is an absolute callousness and enjoyment of this that’s pretty sick out of Trump.
Somebody had TDS with their coffee this morning. Why are you so obsessed with how the former President responds to everything?
Interesting developments...third person in the house?
https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-pr...e-charged-after-violent-incident-151946821889
Interesting developments...third person in the house?
https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-pr...e-charged-after-violent-incident-151946821889
Last edited:
Certainly a weird part of the story. Original reports say the police were let in by a 3rd person now the DA says that is not correct.
San Francisco DA Jenkins swats down misinformation about Pelosi attack
San Francisco district attorney Brooke Jenkins on Sunday released new details of the attack on Paul Pelosi and corrected some bad information published by various outlets.
www.cbsnews.com
Yeah, there seems to be more to the story and now the DA is contradicting the Police Chief?Certainly a weird part of the story. Original reports say the police were let in by a 3rd person now the DA says that is not correct.
San Francisco DA Jenkins swats down misinformation about Pelosi attack
San Francisco district attorney Brooke Jenkins on Sunday released new details of the attack on Paul Pelosi and corrected some bad information published by various outlets.
From what the DA is saying, it was only Pelosi and Dupape, and one of them let the officers in. But then officers had to tackle him because they were struggling over the hammer. I'm going to guess all of the facts don't come out until next Wednesday.
I'll bet if you make a list of all the potential candidates for president in 2024 on both sides, you'll realize at least 50% didn't address this publicly. Who cares the others didn't address it, TDS is all that matters.
You truly are a childish schmuck.
When your arguments fall apart or someone doesn't agree with you or calls you out, your only responses is to call people names, false equivalency, blah blah blah.
Obama has not condemned the attack yet your are silent on that. He gave a gratuitous thoughts and prayers with his phony boys in the hood voice and then went right into politics.
Get YOUR head out of YOUR ass!!
I'd think that the 911 call and bodycam footage should both be available to provide some clarity into what happened. Not releasing those would suggest they are hiding something in my opinion.
A
anon_ezos2e9wn1ob0
Guest
Here come the conspiracy theories. This is why I've unaffiliated myself from the GOP. Everything is a conspiracy, it's quite sad.
I would agree...never a good look when the Police Chief and DA offering differing reports though.
Found the clip of the Chief. They aren't differing really.
Chief said the door was opened by "someone inside" and the police officers observed Pelosi and the attacker.
News story ran with that being a 3rd person, but that does not seem to be accurate.
NBC reported it, so you would assume they are doing so accurately, but I guess not. Like you said, the key is the body cam footage. Just odd how it's been reported.... If just Pelosi and DuPape, you let the police in and go back and fight over the same hammer?
Agreed. That's part of the craziness of the story. They chief said they both had hammers.
It sounded like DuPape wanted to tie up Paul until Nancy got home, so it's possible that it was Dupape opening the door expecting it to be Nancy and then ran back to attack Paul when it was the police.
That's my guess so far. Paul opening the door wouldn't make any sense.
And not to make light of this, but 1) Who has two hammers in their bedroom, or 2) Why would DuPape bring two hammers..."one for me and one for you?"
Even his ex-wife said he was mentally ill seven years go.
Last edited:
Well, yeah… I don’t think DuPape sounds like a rational guy. He might have had 13 hammers with him.
A
anon_ezos2e9wn1ob0
Guest
Unless I read otherwise from a reputable source I have no reason waste time with conspiracy theories that are being thrown out there.
Well it certainly sounds like you are reading all of the conspiracy stories....lol
A
anon_ezos2e9wn1ob0
Guest
A
anon_ezos2e9wn1ob0
Guest
A
anon_ezos2e9wn1ob0
Guest
fwiw -
Seems to clarify some of the items which were misreported and squash some of the conspiracy theories.
Seems to clarify some of the items which were misreported and squash some of the conspiracy theories.
A
anon_ezos2e9wn1ob0
Guest
A
anon_ezos2e9wn1ob0
Guest
What is reaffirmed in NY governor race is that a lot of governors pick lightweights as lt governor never expecting them to become governors and insuring they don’t show them up during their term.Hochul was a nobody from Eire county who fit the bill for egotistical randy Andy.Kathy is latest conspiracy theorist saying republicans are conspiracy spreaders on crime.Heck Kathy even rode the subway.I mean just because she was the only person in the car with her bodyguard it was brave move LOL.
A
anon_ezos2e9wn1ob0
Guest
Yes, because saying the facts won't come out until after the midterms isn't conspiracy.
That's correct. It's his opinion, not a conspiracy theory. You disagree with his opinion - that's fine, but know what is and isn't a conspiracy theory.
A conspiracy theory is something along the lines of the attacker and Mr. Pelosi were gay lovers and the police are covering it up.
Similar threads
