ADVERTISEMENT

So no one here has voted for or is going to vote for the treasonous coup-attempting felon rapist guy, right?

Call me a conspiracy theorist but I think voter fraud in 2020 is more of a question now to me than it was 4 years ago. About 135 million voters in 2016, magically the only year of mail in ballots 2020 there's almost 160 million, then 4 years later when you can vote in person we're back down to 145 million. Something isn't smelling quite right.
15 million votes don’t disappear when both parties made the biggest push on record to register new voters and have the largest in person turnouts in history.

Counting fraud, multiple ballots submitted by one person and fake/dead votes. The truth will come out.
  • Like
Reactions: SHallguy2

So no one here has voted for or is going to vote for the treasonous coup-attempting felon rapist guy, right?

Well, if you mean people wouldn't have voted for a woman or an African American back then, I suppose it would. But if you mean they wouldn't vote for someone who incessantly lies about voter fraud, sought to overturn our election to hold onto power, is a felon, sexually assaulted people, talks about using the justice department to go after political enemies, has used his office to personally enrich himself and his family to the tune of billions of dollars, admires and aspires to be a dictator, racistly others minorities, etc, etc, it would not.
Call me a conspiracy theorist but I think voter fraud in 2020 is more of a question now to me than it was 4 years ago. About 135 million voters in 2016, magically the only year of mail in ballots 2020 there's almost 160 million, then 4 years later when you can vote in person we're back down to 145 million. Something isn't smelling quite right.

So no one here has voted for or is going to vote for the treasonous coup-attempting felon rapist guy, right?

Wouldn't that apply to Harris as well, though?
Well, if you mean people wouldn't have voted for a woman or an African American back then, I suppose it would. But if you mean they wouldn't vote for someone who incessantly lies about voter fraud, sought to overturn our election to hold onto power, is a felon, sexually assaulted people, talks about using the justice department to go after political enemies, has used his office to personally enrich himself and his family to the tune of billions of dollars, admires and aspires to be a dictator, racistly others minorities, etc, etc, it would not.

From 2003 Listen

The country is divided what a startling revelation.The remedy is tax the rich more.Top 5% pay around 60% of federal income tax.Bernie like all pay your fair share Dems never define fair share.Just tell us Bernie what should top 5% pay 70%,80% 90% or 100%.Most people don’t know the numbers I cited so you can demagogue the issue like the good socialist Bernie is.Nothing new to hear in this clip.
It is from 2003

So no one here has voted for or is going to vote for the treasonous coup-attempting felon rapist guy, right?

That's silly. She's going to end up with more votes than Obama in both elections he had. She's got 68 million votes with only 55% of California reported. Obama never received 70 million.
Apologies, misread the post I replied to, I thought he was asking again about Biden voters again. I'd guess she got a lot of the Obama voters but not all. Probably held most of the partisan ones just by being registered as a Democrat, but they don't seem to have a ton in common. And I'd guess that she struggled with independent voters who went Obama's way. All just guessing though.

From 2003 Listen

The country is divided what a startling revelation.The remedy is tax the rich more.Top 5% pay around 60% of federal income tax.Bernie like all pay your fair share Dems never define fair share.Just tell us Bernie what should top 5% pay 70%,80% 90% or 100%.Most people don’t know the numbers I cited so you can demagogue the issue like the good socialist Bernie is.Nothing new to hear in this clip.
  • Like
Reactions: SPK145

Nova in trouble

Not excusing the loss but Columbia's top 8 players are all in their 3rd or 4th year with the team. That continuity is valuable for player and team development in the transfer/NIL era.
This is a MAJOR factor early in the season. Columbia’s continuity and the trend they’ve been on was on display last night. They play real well.

It’s also coaching at Villanova. They look totally unorganized. Culture is excellence. They have not played defense or done the little things Wright harped on since he left. Then without the conveyor belt of development of the roster it’s even harder. Wright didn’t want to deal with this, he’s a coach first, not a GM, and he made that clear, but if he did want to deal it the team would still be markedly better. He’s a HOF coach for a reason.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT