silkcitypirate said:

Schiano was given a big contract and whatever he wanted at ru. The hire was a big mistake but nobody else really wanted the job . His resume is average at best . Failure in the NFL, at ru one big win against Louisville his first time around and some second rate bowl games. Now they are stuck with him. Eating his big state contract should not happen.RU Rah, Rah !! Hahahaha !!!!!!!!!!

Click to expand...

The “coach” no one wanted and the “team” no one wanted to coach!

Well I do like that there is only 1 team from the Big 10 in the entire top 22.

I expect us to be rated this way however, I believe we have some intriguing players who could surprise under Holloway.

It will be interesting playing in Charleston

NJ doesn’t have big time college football. Never has, never will.

SHUSA said:

no it doesn't. frankly probably the opposite. the one is positioned to find solutions, the other just diarrheaing all over the office.

really interesting though because most people here think she's a bad candidate because she has no ideas. well they're all there. in depth. i doubt anyone will read it god forbid they have to admit it. one already admitted it lol.

Click to expand...

Part of running for office and being president is a sales pitch getting people to understand why your polices are good and why the public should support them. Harris is really bad at the sale.

That's why Trump isn't offering any specific policies. He's good at selling a narrative, but he's horrible talking about the details.
Tariffs are a great example there. He still doesn't understand how they work and if his campaign outlined a full policy - he would be completely lost.

SPK145 said:

I stopped reading as I was afraid I was going to read about the stupidity of thinking there was price gouging.

Click to expand...

Did grocery store profits not surge in 2020 and 2021 well above what a normal margin would have been for the industry?

SPK145 said:

So nobody has yet to explain how giving people money is going to cut costs.

Click to expand...

It doesn't. Your issue is really that the tax credit should have been in section 2.
I'd agree with that.

I get why you as a libertarian would be against it, but a birth year tax credit to help with the related costs during that first year would be a huge help for new families and wouldn't cost that much relative to the current child tax credit. There is also always a fairly strong ROI when the government gives lower to middle class families more money.

I do understand the argument that if you can't afford children, you shouldn't have them. That's what I did, but it doesn't change the fact that many people do have children who can't afford them and longer term impacts of helping those families will be beneficial to the children and the country overall. Longer term, the birth rate in the US is too low a tax credit would help there as well.

It's good that the big east is getting some preseason respect. You guys are definitely under ranked. It's bulletin board material.

For what it's worth, how good a job Holloway did last year with what he had is underappreciated, even on this board. Hopefully, this year will actually have a big east rep on the committee who stands up for big east teams.

Kenpom Rankings. 5 Big East teams in the top 25. Seton coming in at an underrated 91

5 Big East teams in the top 22 and Seton Hall 91. Sure, we’ll see. Board material

It's amazing that CBS, which is inextricably linked to the NCAA Tournament, is the only major outlet that really props up this clown. Almost anyone they could use would be better.

silkcitypirate said:

Clueless .

Click to expand...

Nova 20th?

is that Georgetown at 88?

oy

Clueless .

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

Where can you watch this?

SHUSA said:

just because i'm right

Click to expand...

LMAO

HALL85 said:

Keep trolling ….

Click to expand...

thought so.

just because i'm right and you're embarrassed to respond doesn't mean i'm a troll. when you guys get stumped you either deflect, name call, or take your ball home. check one for name call.

SHUHoopsFan said:

When you're comparing what the candidates have posted on their website you know the candidate you want to win is in trouble. Pretty sure that means they've done a terrible job telling the people what they're for.

Click to expand...

no it doesn't. frankly probably the opposite. the one is positioned to find solutions, the other just diarrheaing all over the office.

really interesting though because most people here think she's a bad candidate because she has no ideas. well they're all there. in depth. i doubt anyone will read it god forbid they have to admit it. one already admitted it lol.

SPK145 said:

I managed to get through page 1 of Chapter 1 before the sheer stupidity hit me right in the face.

Under "Lower Costs for Middle-Class Families", are these:

Restoring the Expanded Child Tax Credit to Up to $3,600 to Help More Than 100 Million Americans
A New $6,000 Tax Cut to Help Families Pay for the High Costs of a Child’s First Year of Life
These don't lower costs. They put more money in the hands of the chosen ones. If anything, that would most likely increase costs.

That's no different than saying tariffs would decrease costs for people.

I couldn't read any further.

Click to expand...

there's meat on this bone. not sure if you stopped reading the other link i said which is embarassing.

you would think $6000 goes to new families not chosen ones no?

Robot_Man said:

That Trump issues page is an abomination, but the "Free, Honest and Lawful Elections" one made me laugh out loud.

People like to get on the Harris campaign for being scant on policy specifics (not disagreeing with this), but it's not like the Trump people are doing any better here.

Login to view embedded media
Q: "How are you going to end the war in Ukraine?"

A: "Well, we're going to end the war by not being weak and not being dumb, which is what Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are. It's very simple..."

This is like how a fifth grader would respond in an argument.

Click to expand...

he's cornered the 5th grade education cohorts for years.

That Trump issues page is an abomination, but the "Free, Honest and Lawful Elections" one made me laugh out loud.

People like to get on the Harris campaign for being scant on policy specifics (not disagreeing with this), but it's not like the Trump people are doing any better here.

Login to view embedded media
Q: "How are you going to end the war in Ukraine?"

A: "Well, we're going to end the war by not being weak and not being dumb, which is what Joe Biden and Kamala Harris are. It's very simple..."

This is like how a fifth grader would respond in an argument.

Silk and c-man...pirate crew top fans.

SPK145 said:

I managed to get through page 1 of Chapter 1 before the sheer stupidity hit me right in the face.

Under "Lower Costs for Middle-Class Families", are these:

Restoring the Expanded Child Tax Credit to Up to $3,600 to Help More Than 100 Million Americans
A New $6,000 Tax Cut to Help Families Pay for the High Costs of a Child’s First Year of Life
These don't lower costs. They put more money in the hands of the chosen ones. If anything, that would most likely increase costs.

That's no different than saying tariffs would decrease costs for people.

I couldn't read any further.

Click to expand...

Are "the chosen ones" 1) people who files taxes, and 2) have children?