Well that not happening so next optionWhat Seton Hall needs more then anything else is a strong president who is an outstanding fundraiser who can bring all the different interest Together with a common interest and recognize the value of a successful BE basketball program.
I say GM, asst GM, traveling secretary, asst to the traveling secretary, make Mike McBride NIL director emeritus, hire a new NIL director, a few secretaries and a good janitor for the practice center and maybe we’ll win a few basketball games.What changes should Hall make in terms of coaches ( replace or add) and to their admin such as GM and marketing
GM is the key. I think in this world of NIL Agents, this has become yet another thing we need. And the GM might just handle ioerations/money and than need a personnel person. Wasn't there some about andre Barrett doing something to help with this?I say GM, asst GM, traveling secretary, asst to the traveling secretary, make Mike McBride NIL director emeritus, hire a new NIL director, a few secretaries and a good janitor for the practice center and maybe we’ll win a few basketball games.
LOL, Mike McBride already left Seton Hall.I say GM, asst GM, traveling secretary, asst to the traveling secretary, make Mike McBride NIL director emeritus, hire a new NIL director, a few secretaries and a good janitor for the practice center and maybe we’ll win a few basketball games.
I'm not familiar with the structure at other schools, but don't you think the GMs ultimately report to the HC and do what the HC ultimately recommends and wants (if feasible)?What I realize now is that all programs now need a strong GM. By strong I mean does not report to the head coach., The head coach and the assistants are now no longer responsible for the entire program, they are only responsible for the on-court product and scouting potential players with the GM responsible for scouting in conjunction with the head coach and coaching staff, roster construction, and all the off court stuff.
Probably can't, and shouldn't, rewrite contracts but this will lead to less power for the head coach and ultimately less cost for a head coach. They are WILDLY overpaid as it is.
This is dead on. Unless and until the rules change, we need to treat roster construction like pro teams. Let Shaheen coach.What I realize now is that all programs now need a strong GM. By strong I mean does not report to the head coach., The head coach and the assistants are now no longer responsible for the entire program, they are only responsible for the on-court product and scouting potential players with the GM responsible for scouting in conjunction with the head coach and coaching staff, roster construction, and all the off court stuff.
Probably can't, and shouldn't, rewrite contracts but this will lead to less power for the head coach and ultimately less cost for a head coach. They are WILDLY overpaid as it is.
Then it’s nothing more than a paper pushing job that shouldn’t pay much,I'm not familiar with the structure at other schools, but don't you think the GMs ultimately report to the HC and do what the HC ultimately recommends and wants (if feasible)?
I think the fundraising and connecting with agents/advisors year round, so the HC and staff don't have to do so, and then dealing with the $ negotiations, is a big part of what most do in that role.Then it’s nothing more than a paper pushing job that shouldn’t pay much,
I also neglected to say that the GM role is not a fundraising role. He would work with the fundraising arm.
They can feel that way, but tenured professors do very well. It's like the baseball team complaining that they didn't have all the amenities and perks that the basketball team did, when I was in school: they're not driving the revenue.They are WILDLY overpaid as it is.
And a very big bone of contention for faculty members & administrators, who feel they are just as important & grossly underpaid.
The econ 101 professor is not driving the bus on revenue generation and ROI to the schoolThey are WILDLY overpaid as it is.
And a very big bone of contention for faculty members & administrators, who feel they are just as important & grossly underpaid.
You think Izzo and Pitino are standing back while someone chooses their players. Danny H wondering why his GM didnt go after player X?This is dead on. Unless and until the rules change, we need to treat roster construction like pro teams. Let Shaheen coach.
I think the GMs do the leg work all season and bring those guys options/possibilities, and then the HC makes the call.You think Izzo and Pitino are standing back while someone chooses their players. Danny H wondering why his GM didnt go after player X?
LOL, Mike McBride already left Seton Hall.
That was an abject failure of a hire. Don't know if it was his fault, Seton Hall's fault, both of their faults....but that went exactly how I expected it to. I don't know whose idea the whole "Radio Silence" tactic was after the initial sales of hopes and dreams, but it was and is frustrating.
They can feel that way, but tenured professors do very well. It's like the baseball team complaining that they didn't have all the amenities and perks that the basketball team did, when I was in school: they're not driving the revenue.
posts above suggested othewise.I think the GMs do the leg work all season and bring those guys options/possibilities, and then the HC makes the call.
I'd think it was pretty stout for the previous 10 years or so, but no idea. The rutgers profs ("Rutgers 200?") have been fighting this battle for decades, while they watch the athletic department dump money into the Raritan River. In the pay-for-play age, I have to think that their complaints are falling on increasingly deaf ears. It's completely wrong, of course -- but these athletic programs have been unmasked for the professional minor leagues that they have become. By the same token, some tenured prof who makes half a million per year and teaches one course a semester probably shouldn't complain.Any idea what the annual revenue is for SHU MBB? It had to take a hard hit this year.
100%. Pitino gives marching orders. For example, he says "We need a PG, SG and a Forward. We need guys who can shoot, are athletic without compromising defense."I think the GMs do the leg work all season and bring those guys options/possibilities, and then the HC makes the call.
McBride went back to Texas where his wife and kids are to a great university in Rice. NIL went from about $300,000 to $1.5 million, or thereabouts, on his watch with major resistance initially from what I heard from everyone except Felt. McBride was not targeting the mega donors, only the events that Onward Setonia promoted.That was an abject failure of a hire. Don't know if it was his fault, Seton Hall's fault, both of their faults....but that went exactly how I expected it to. I don't know whose idea the whole "Radio Silence" tactic was after the initial sales of hopes and dreams, but it was and is frustrating.
Even if someone here had a number I doubt they'd be at liberty to post it but I'd guess operating revenues + Pirate Blue donations roughly cover department expenses most years before NIL.I'd think it was pretty stout for the previous 10 years or so, but no idea. The rutgers profs ("Rutgers 200?") have been fighting this battle for decades, while they watch the athletic department dump money into the Raritan River. In the pay-for-play age, I have to think that their complaints are falling on increasingly deaf ears. It's completely wrong, of course -- but these athletic programs have been unmasked for the professional minor leagues that they have become. By the same token, some tenured prof who makes half a million per year and teaches one course a semester probably shouldn't complain.
Appreciate the insight. Couple of things:McBride went back to Texas where his wife and kids are to a great university in Rice. NIL went from about $300,000 to $1.5 million, or thereabouts, on his watch with major resistance initially from what I heard from everyone except Felt. McBride was not targeting the mega donors, only the events that Onward Setonia promoted.
So, based on a couple conversations I had with people who had spend some time with him, and being able to read between the lines as someone who has worked in alignment with development offices for 25 years, it was impression that (at the risk of oversimplifying it) he was waiting around by the phone for the meaningful donors to call him ... which did not happen often. Now, maybe the task of major gifts for athletics was the formal responsibility of someone else, but that seems inefficient when you consider the responsibilities McBride was charged with.3. Why was McBride not targeting mega donors? Wasn't he brought in to do that along with corporate partnerships?
He told me that they had struck out on soliciting NIL money from something like 47/55 CURRENT corporate partners. I would certainly hit up JAG and RWJ -- the latter gave a good chunk of money to rutgers' practice facility for naming rights. Mike seemed surprised to hear that.McBride went back to Texas where his wife and kids are to a great university in Rice. NIL went from about $300,000 to $1.5 million, or thereabouts, on his watch with major resistance initially from what I heard from everyone except Felt. McBride was not targeting the mega donors, only the events that Onward Setonia promoted.
Thank you for the value add information here. I always feel like I'm forced to understand veiled references or to have to read between the lines. Quite refreshing to get dialogue like this.So, based on a couple conversations I had with people who had spend some with him, and being able to read between the lines of someone who has worked in alignment with development offices for 25 years, it was impression that (at the risk of oversimplifying it) he was waiting around by the phone for the meaningful donors to call him ... which did not happen often. Now, maybe the task of major gifts for athletics was the formal responsibility of someone else, but that seems inefficient when you consider the responsibilities McBride was charged with.
If this is an unfair assessment, I apologize. But I wouldn't just write it to yell at clouds.
To be sure, this is my interpretation of those conversations I've had, framed through the experience I've had working alongside development folks for all those years. What I wrote is still a mediated message, even though I believe it to be correct.Thank you for the value add information here. I always feel like I'm forced to understand veiled references or to have to read between the lines. Quite refreshing to get dialogue like this.
Fair to say, expecting to be reactive to other people is a bad decision. With this program, you can't wait by the phone nor can you afford to wait and let other people do the cooking. I can't say if he was a bad hire because my guess is they didn't set the proper parameters of the role. In any event, failure is failure. Curious if the University replaces him or just lets the role wither and die like most things here.
Just like other pro leagues operate....coach coaches, GM is the overall managing director.What I realize now is that all programs now need a strong GM. By strong I mean does not report to the head coach., The head coach and the assistants are now no longer responsible for the entire program, they are only responsible for the on-court product and scouting potential players with the GM responsible for scouting in conjunction with the head coach and coaching staff, roster construction, and all the off court stuff.
Probably can't, and shouldn't, rewrite contracts but this will lead to less power for the head coach and ultimately less cost for a head coach. They are WILDLY overpaid as it is.