We have evidence from other countries data which suggests that the spread is not inevitable and it does not have to reach a certain percentage of the population to be controlled.
None of these larger gatherings are of any advocacy to lower the curve and slow the spread, they are actions of the weakest minds
No such evidence exists.
Sure it does.
https://covid19-projections.com/france
France - 1 spike in death and they are essentially done.
https://covid19-projections.com/germany
Germany - 1 spike in death and they are essentially done.
New Zealand - They shut it down right away.
The virus did not need to spread through their population centers. The evidence is fairly clear.
Cases in France are currently climbing. According to you and all the other alarmists, hospitalizations and increased death will follow. Germany is seeing a slighter increase, may be the beginning of a spike. We don't know yet.
So why does US media and the politicians focus on case counts?
I’m not saying where I stand on these issues however I’ve now heard multiple stories of death certificates citing covid even though the death was something else. One or two deaths were certainly not related but the 3 others hypothetically could have been but prob a stretch. Generally speaking seems like people particularly politicians and media are taking advantage of a lot of unknowns.So why are politicians begging people to be tested, symptoms or not? The flu also spreads asymptomatically, along with various other diseases. The answer is because they want to juice the numbers to make a scared public think they're doing something about it.
I haven’t seen a single mainstream report on what you’re saying “some will get that right” - because they don’t really care.Depends on what you are talking about. Probably some bad and a few good reasons depending on the context of the discussion.
Case counts do matter, but only if there is more context around the numbers.
If we announce 100,000 cases tomorrow with 2 million tests, I would feel better about that if we announced 50,000 cases with 500,000 tests.
Some reporters will get that right but some won’t.
Hi @Merge. I've been saying for months now Murphy will announce that all schools will start remote. You said that I will be wrong. Please read this article. It looks like unfortunately I will be right again. As I have said previously Murphy will cave in. I did state it seems like you don't understand the politics of NJ. The teachers association is very powerful.
https://www.nj.com/education/2020/0...n-murphy-to-start-nj-schools-remote-only.html
Looks like Murphy caved to the unions and some larger districts. Now we will see if other districts that planned to go at least partially, will reverse course for only remote.The unions and special interests are putting the squeeze on Murphy now. He will cave, as he is spineless.
What a disgrace these people are. The virus is no longer a problem in New Jersey, yet these cowards we call teachers and administrators don't want to go to work. Fire them all and get people who actually want to help young people. They say follow the data, facts and science. Well all of that says the virus is no longer a threat in New Jersey.
These people already get summers off, have had little to do since March and now they want another free ride while collecting their taxpayer funded salaries and benefits. So pathetic.
https://www.nj.com/education/2020/0...ups-say-in-unified-message-to-gov-murphy.html
When your largest customer demographic becomes looters, it's not really a good sign.NYC is toast.
Retail Chains Abandon Manhattan: ‘It’s Unsustainable'
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/11/nyregion/nyc-economy-chain-stores.html
None of these larger gatherings are of any advocacy to lower the curve and slow the spread, they are actions of the weakest minds
So if schools will be going all remote, I can't wait to read about the furloughs for gym teachers, athletic directors, support staff, janitors, library staff, school nurses, etc.
Oh...wait. What a disgrace.
But did he just open the door today?Like I said. The governor will not be closing schools.
But did he just open the door today?
Once he lets in to big districts like Newark/Elizabeth have home school only because teachers don't want to go into school, what is going to stop the union from telling members in other districts to refuse to attend in class learning? Biggest NJ teachers union is on record as saying school should be remote.
I hope you are right, I guess we will see in next 2 weeks how many schools get waivers to stay closed. I just know the teachers union leadership which has lot of power over its members and state officials is pushing for all remote learning, as we know with the NCAA (since this is a college basketball board), once you open door for waivers, you often open pandora's box.Some may close.
Elizabeth lost several teachers to Covid, so I get why the teachers there don't want to go back yet.
The governor could have caved and closed schools. He didn't and said the districts need to show why they can't open and provide a timeline on when they can, and their plan to teach in the meantime.
That seems like a reasonable approach to me.
I hope you are right, I guess we will see in next 2 weeks how many schools get waivers to stay closed. I just know the teachers union leadership which has lot of power over its members and state officials is pushing for all remote learning, as we know with the NCAA (since this is a college basketball board), once you open door for waivers, you often open pandora's box.
Yes, pretty much all parents I know seem to want schools to be open, even if only partially.It will be a bit of a balancing act but as a parent watching the reactions from other parents... people are absolutely flipping out about the possibility of schools going online only. I think the pressure to open schools is far greater than the pressure to close them.
I think most will make efforts to open up.
How about high schools going remote since they are older. Use the HS classrooms for younger kids so to permit social distance in person learning at the K-8 levels?? Teacher shortages is a non issue because the in person stuff can still use live video feeds and TAs. Too many issue spotters and not enough problem solversYes, pretty much all parents I know seem to want schools to be open, even if only partially.
Unfortunately, government and unions never seem to have the interest of the public when making decisions.
You are wrong.
You have to ignore so much evidence to the contrary to believe that.
Australia, New Zealand, Germany, Finland, Norway... etc... All countries where it did not need to run its course to control it.
Peru culturally is not equipped to manage a virus like this no matter what they do.
40% of the country does not have a refrigerator. 60% of the country doesn't have a bank account. They need to be out of the house all the time using mas transit to go anywhere and were constantly in large crowds at markets and banks to cash unemployment checks etc...
You are laugh out loud funny. Keep sticking to your faulty narrative without any evidence. Day by day we see more evidence that this is a virus we can't control but outbreaks will burn out if we give it time.
Why was the virus controlled in South Korea right away and not Peru?
That's one tiny country, one that can only be accessed by boat or plane for the most part due to the border with its northern neighbor. The majority of other countries have seen sharp spikes followed by receding case counts.
FWIW, NJ hospitals are now preparing for a second wave.
At this point I’m hearing 50/50.
Found this interesting in that there is no rhyme or reason, particularly the graphs:
https://wallethub.com/edu/states-coronavirus-restrictions/73818/
Why was the virus controlled in South Korea right away and not Peru?