well actually players do consider endorsements when they sign somewhere. but point is, put a cap on it. it wont make it fair. it never was fair. it will just make it more like how it was.
Here's the deal
- Thread starter Halldan1
- Start date
whats new though? thats the rules they dont have play.
the money is so big the IRS has woken up. these endorsement deals wil be reported , and sweeping under the rug will not just be an ncaa penalty , but a federal one.
You can’t cap endorsements…you are limiting a players right to earn.
Yeah. You make it sound like people aren’t still going to get that. And I’m betting those that do, don’t report it
Used to be a player had a right to earn a degree in return for playing. That’s apparently not the case now.
i dont think anyone is worried about under the table . but now everything is out in the open it's an easier ticket for IRS to follow. are corporations employing bag men ?
exactly what it says. you can earn as much as you want. doesnt mean you're eligible to play in a game. same thing if a transfer sit out rule is instituted. its their right to pay, not to play.
No they’re getting deductions they never got. But if you think $100 handshakes are completely done. I think you’re wrong
Caps can't be instituted unilaterally. That's collusion or restraint of trade.
What entity (i.e. union) are you bargaining with and what are you giving in return to get the cap?
Hoops Analyst must have missed the news that Mark has been with the Knicks for a full season now.
Similar threads
