Why should they have to sit out for doing something that a) violates no rule, b) their owners support, and c) pushes back against powerful forces trying to compel them to act against their convictions despite a and b?
Why should they have to sit out for doing something that a) violates no rule, b) their owners support, and c) pushes back against powerful forces trying to compel them to act against their convictions despite a and b?
Hey here's a thought, if you don't want police officers to shoot you, comply wth their requests during any incident. Pretty simple. I agree that there are the occasional situation like in south carolina where the cop is in the wrong and in that case that cop was convicted of murder. But in most cases i.e. charlotte last year they are in fact justified. Why is it that all these "innocent" victims of police brutality haved rap sheets a mile long and yet the media never points this out.Resisting arrest, being accused of domestic violence, and even assault are not capital crimes.
That's not how any of this works.
Hey here's a thought, if you don't want police officers to shoot you, comply wth their requests during any incident. Pretty simple. I agree that there are the occasional situation like in south carolina where the cop is in the wrong and in that case that cop was convicted of murder. But in most cases i.e. charlotte last year they are in fact justified. Why is it that all these "innocent" victims of police brutality haved rap sheets a mile long and yet the media never points this out.
NFL calling Trump devisive but in my opinion, Omamination was the biggest cause of our nation being as divided as it is today and probably the root of this whole kneeling crap.
The appeal of President Trump is that he's not politically correct and tells it like it is and how many of us feel. These leftists are brainwashed into being white shamed..that just because we're white, we're evil and racist. It's a load of ...well you know...and many of the forgotten working class in america are tired of it.
I agree that there are the occasional situation like in south carolina where the cop is in the wrong and in that case that cop was convicted of murder.
Really disappointed that I can't even come to this message board in peace without having to read more about this nonsense. This topic has ZERO to do with the Seton Hall Pirates right now, and I have to politely disagree with Dan for thinking this is an appropriate discussion in this forum. We have several other forums where this conversation would be better served and more appropriate. Again, this is a Pirates Hoops Chat forum, not a pro sports forum. Not interested in reading about this, nor am I interested in reading about how awful the Giants are either, for that matter.
One of the few remaining places left that are typically insulated from all of this political horse crap that seems to infest the airwaves and now that is gone too.
I am a disappointed Steelers fan right now. Dumb decision and way to protest. Got to find a better way to make a statement.
Non-compliance with a police officer is not a capital crime. Having a long rap sheet is not a capital crime. The police are part of the judicial system, not the entire thing.
This should not be a partisan issue.
I actually think the opposite is happening. There are probably a lot of people that are sympathetic to improving training and accountability in law enforcement but these protests lack any substance or stated objectives. We have been having this "conversation" since Kaepernick took a knee, but where are the solutions and who's leading the charge? Crickets.like I said...it's working.
like I said...it's working.
No one is saying it is a capital crime. However, if a police officer has to choose between a non compliant suspects life and their own they will and SHOULD choose their own. Very simple equation, don't commit crimes or if you do, don't resist=you don't get shot. Really simple.Non-compliance with a police officer is not a capital crime. Having a long rap sheet is not a capital crime. The police are part of the judicial system, not the entire thing.
This should not be a partisan issue.
No, what I took from it was not your opinion but the childish names you saw fit to call a poster that disagreed with you.kinda frustrated that that is what you took away from my thought out post.
No, what I took from it was not your opinion but the childish names you saw fit to call a poster that disagreed with you.
I completely disagree that it's working.. It's actually causing resentment in many. Many don't even know why they are kneeling. Bottom line is that Trump's statements had nothing to do with race. Yes they have the right to protest. There are better ways to exercise that right than to disrespect the servicemen who have given their lives to protect those rights. Polls show that 80% of people are offended by the action of kneeling. It's all about money in the NFL so when it hits their wallets something will be done. I've done my part by canceling my NFL Sunday ticket subscription. You know what BLM and Kaepernick should focus on... working in communities and stopping black Americans from killing each other since 93% of black homicides are committed by other blacks.Actually the state case ended in a deadlocked jury, which is unfathomable to me. But that right there just shows that these protests are needed. Luckily in this case federal civil rights charges were brought and he plead guilty, but will prolly only get 20 years. You think that guy he gunned down, or me, or you, would get 20 if we shot a cop in the back? Riiiiiight.
So thank you for being wrong and actually helping my point even more.
And as for the "why don't they protest the criminals that do a lot of crime" nonsense argument, let's just put that to bed right now. That is such a lazy straw man and you all know it. Of course these athletes & every non-criminal is against the crime that takes place in the black community. There's no controversy there. We're all against it & it doesn't really need to be shouted from the rooftops. It's obvious. What would a protest even do for that? Who are you protesting to? Criminals aren't exactly advertising themselves. And they hold no power. But the cops and govt DO have power. They are asserting that power many times in destructive ways, and the powerless (or perceived powerless) are simply asking them to stop. So now athletes are taking more drastic measures to force you to deal with the issue. We can deal with black on black crime, global warming, the health care debate & Seton Hall 2018 recruiting too...all at the same time. Anyone trying to make this an either/or type argument has an agenda: to protect those in power. And what's scary is they might not even realize it.
Protest has always been partly about making people uncomfortable. Not to just go in a corner and wave a sign. And if you're backing the powered class & you feel uncomfortable....I guess that means it's working.
You're kidding right? We are talking about the use of lethal force in non-lethal situations with the deciding factor being race. This is the highest form of brutality. As I always say, "Police Brutality" is an oxymoron. Once police choose to be brutal, they are no longer police.No one is saying it is a capital crime. However, if a police officer has to choose between a non compliant suspects life and their own they will and SHOULD choose their own. Very simple equation, don't commit crimes or if you do, don't resist=you don't get shot. Really simple.
This is America, whether we like it or not they have this right.
THAT SHOULD BE THE END OF STORY
If you do not like the constitution or the rights we have you can get out.
This is America, whether we like it or not they have this right.
THAT SHOULD BE THE END OF STORY
If you do not like the constitution or the rights we have you can get out.
The workplace is collectively bargained, what is the literature of the basic agreement?I'm not a lawyer, so I'm not sure whether or not they possess that right in the workplace. Free speech is a great thing, however there are limits like you can't yell the word fire in a crowded room.
I'm with Dan here 100%. Players have rights to protest and I don't have to agree with it. My family as well has a deep military history with my father who fought in WWII and many uncles, cousins and nephews who proudly served or are currently serving.For me personally the National Anthem stands for pride in the country and a way to honor those that protected our freedom.
My father was a very simple man who led a simple life. But the one thing he was most proud of (other than his family) is serving the country in WW 2. It's the only personal thing about himself that he ever talked about.
I fully understand the issues touching the lives of so many here but I agree with those that say there are better ways to create the awareness necessary.
The right of free speech is protected in this country so the FB players are withing their rights to do what they are doing. But it doesn't mean we have to agree with their actions.
Their purpose? Yes. Their actions to serve that purpose? For me, no.
This is America, whether we like it or not they have this right.
THAT SHOULD BE THE END OF STORY
If you do not like the constitution or the rights we have you can get out.
Stick to High school football on Fridays, college football on Saturdays, turn off the TV on Sundays and spend time with family. Go listen to Clay Travis if you want to hear facts that the media will not report. Although he can act immature, as our president, they use facts to come to conclusions.
Dan, do you truly believe the owners are siding with their players ORAlso, many owners are now openly siding with their players after Trumps most recent comments.
The Steelers not coming out for the anthem is just wrong and distasteful. Two wrongs do not make a right. Some teams interlocked arms and I thought that was a respectful way to protest without denigrating the flag.
1. They have the right no matter what, but can do so with complete impunity when it's granted by the employer.I'm not a lawyer, so I'm not sure whether or not they possess that right in the workplace. Free speech is a great thing, however there are limits like you can't yell the word fire in a crowded room.
2. This is nothing like yelling "fire!" in a crowded room, as it represents no immediate danger to anyone.
I never made a direct comparison. Obviously you twisted it. All I said is there are limits to free speech like yelling fire in a crowded room. There's no direct comparison. That is just 1 of the many examples of where free speech is limited.Yes, but to compare this to yelling fire.....