Nothing gets by you…symbolism by you to make the reply in small font size?
Nothing gets by you…symbolism by you to make the reply in small font size?
That’s not true at all. Only 8% of police departments require a college degree, and many studies show that police with higher education levels are less likely to resort to lethal force in situations that don’t require it. Better decision-making in these situations is PARAMOUNT. Police carry a deadly weapon, and knowing when to use it and when it’s not necessary is of the utmost importance. Their job requires much greater discretion than most others, and education certainly plays into that.
At a minimum, far too many in the profession have proven that the job, for them, is a power trip with the ability to play God. But when racism plays into decision-making, that has the potential to make things exponentially worse. At most of our jobs, a racist doesn’t have the ability to act on their hatred and take a life. I don’t know what the answer is other than more education, better training, and more thorough vetting of character.
How many require a degree and the number of cops with degrees is completely different and I have no idea what you are citing anyway.
Most studies I’ve seen show it the figure to be between 30% and 50% so to have “most of them are also the bottom 10% of our high school class” is nowhere near accurate.
decision making is based on experience, not degrees. Look at any example of journalists or politicians going into simulations. They always make the wrong decision.
Your close minded view of police is part of the problem. My dad was a cop and a damned good one, just like all the men around him I grew up with. They will all say that reform and additional training and education is a good thing. 99.9% of cops want to do their job, make their communities better and get home to their families. To say most of them are among the dumbest of society is insulting and an outright lie.
The number of these situations that occur regularly, which is an exponentially greater number than those caught on camera, proves that your 99.9% number is simply not true. There are a much greater number of racists, and white supremacists, among them than .1%. They all need to be weeded out. But law enforcement as a whole exists in an insulated bubble, and holding themselves accountable has not proven realistic.
These situations do not occur regularly. You on'y think they do because the media amplifies the rare occurrences when it does happen. Of those, the police are justified in most.
Now you said that with a straight face? I don’t have a response for that, and I’m honestly just shocked that you haven’t worked your distaste for football or your disdain for the pesky common cold floating around into the conversation yet.
I deal in the world of facts, not in the world of hysteria, divisiveness, misinformation and agendas.
Unfortunately the officers on scene did not have time like you and I to analyze the situation. They had to make split second, life or death decisions. They did not have rubber bullets so that solution is out. A high/low is absolutely laughable. Would you tackle someone that had a knife? Actually look into surviving edge weapons. A person standing 21 feet away with a knife can close the distance and Stab a person before they can even get a gun out of a holster and you want to high/low him. They already tased him and it didn’t work. He then went to his car stating he was going to get a gun. They considering his actions up to this point they were and should have been in fear of their lives so the officer used legal force and shot the guy. Cops are trained to shoot until the threat is neutralized.
Is there any responsibility on the suspects part? You seem to only want to blame the police here.
You spend most of your days incessantly pushing your personal opinions on a message board. In no way do you deal “in the world of facts” or objectivity.
if they stop glorifying these criminals more of the conversation would focus on the police. i think the cops move was really bad , but saying "justice" for a criminal makes the whole movement look invalid.So they are boycotting because a criminal that had a warrant, was holding a knife, wanted for sexual assault, disobeyed lawful orders to stop, told officers he was going to the car to get a gun and then got shot. Yeah, seems like the kind of guy I would miss work for.
im more on your side with this whole topic in general but i think its clear that while these situations may not occur regularly, they occur far too often.These situations do not occur regularly. You only think they do because the media amplifies the rare occurrences when it does happen. Of those, the police are justified in most.
Now you said that with a straight face? I don’t have a response for that, and I’m honestly just shocked that you haven’t worked your distaste for football or your disdain for the pesky common cold floating around into the conversation yet.
The way some people on here speak about victims is pure insanity. Criminal or not, nobody deserves what happened to Jacob Blake.
Citizens need to comply with police so that situations like this aren’t escalated to the place that it went to. But it’s also hard to put your trust into police organizations that refuse to use body cams and don’t release the names of the officers involved.
Trust needs to be built up between the African American community and law enforcement. It seems almost impossible to do right now. But the only way that these situations can be avoided in the future is to build trust and increase training and reform the way that these situations are approached.
Body cams are a great tool but very expensive. Not only for the equipment but for the upkeep and maintenance. Additionally many of the minority groups are apposing bod cams. More officers have been vindicated with the use of body cams. There have also been a lot of arrests for false claims against law enforcement since body cams came into use.The way some people on here speak about victims is pure insanity. Criminal or not, nobody deserves what happened to Jacob Blake.
Citizens need to comply with police so that situations like this aren’t escalated to the place that it went to. But it’s also hard to put your trust into police organizations that refuse to use body cams and don’t release the names of the officers involved.
Trust needs to be built up between the African American community and law enforcement. It seems almost impossible to do right now. But the only way that these situations can be avoided in the future is to build trust and increase training and reform the way that these situations are approached.
are they expensive? in 2020? millions of people have similar home/dash cams. doesnt seem too expensive. electronic devices typically require almost no upkeep.Body cams are a great tool but very expensive. Not only for the equipment but for the upkeep and maintenance. Additionally many of the minority groups are apposing bod cams. More officers have been vindicated with the use of body cams. There have also been a lot of arrests for false claims against law enforcement since body cams came into use.
Your point on criminals to stop resisting is spot on.
A good place to start would be teaching that community to obey the commands of officers when they find themselves in a situation with law enforcement. Listen, do as instructed and do not resist. Is that really too difficult?
Body cameras are a relatively new thing. Not every department has them. And this officer's name has been released.
none of those things are brought to you by people who are deemed honorable, have unlimited power, and expected to not only enforce the law but uphold it themselves.When you are dealing with a society of over 400 million people, yes these situations do occur regularly. You know what else occurs regularly? Human Trafficking. Drug Overdoses. Rape. Violent Assault. The point is pretty much every good and bad scenario you can think of will happen regularly when you have a sample size that large. The problem is you are associating what is portrayed on the news or in social media as if it applies to the whole and it statistically just does not.
That's right our citizens need to listen or we will shoot them 7 times in the back and so they won't ever walk away from us again or feel anything below their waste for the rest of their lives.
Law and order must be kept
/s
Where was labron when the 5 year old white kid got shot in the back of the head last week? He is nothing but a racist crybaby.
I have no problem if you do not like the NBA and their handling of these matters, but is there a need to insult them by saying they can't spell "cat"? It's just mean-spirited, and simply does not acknowledge that many of these players are smart individuals.A 5 year old who never had a chance to make decisions for his life. These asshats who are being glorified for criminal acts have made plenty of bad choices, resisting arrest being the latest in a long line. Honestly I hope the NBA goes away, who needs to listen to these entitled idiots who can't spell cat if you spotted them the c and a lecture hard working Americans on why they are so racist.
I have no problem if you do not like the NBA and their handling of these matters, but is there a need to insult them by saying they can't spell "cat"? It's just mean-spirited, and simply does not acknowledge that many of these players are smart individuals.
none of those things are brought to you by people who are deemed honorable, have unlimited power, and expected to not only enforce the law but uphold it themselves.
and as i said before, its not about it being regular, its about it happening too often. people refuse to acknowledge the role police play in society on both sides of the food/bad coin. one video is equal to a hundres videos of a criminal in the eyes of the public. its not totally invalid.
i disagree. a good place to start is a rehaul of the training and leadership on the police force. people will follow rules when they have trust. unfortunately there is good reason for people to feel untrustworthy towards the police. some feel they have motives, some feel they are dumb, some feel they get off on power. there have been too many examples where all of those are true. maybe not regular but too many examples.A good place to start would be teaching that community to obey the commands of officers when they find themselves in a situation with law enforcement. Listen, do as instructed and do not resist. Is that really too difficult?
Body cameras are a relatively new thing. Not every department has them. And this officer's name has been released.
we realize the arguments against the police, and against the citizen are valid. the issue is that people are prioritizing the importance of one over the other. because that creates division and division keeps people from realizing the real issue today is the rich vs the rest.It's a fair point, but still subjective. How do we determine what is "too often" though? Coming from the heart, even 1 incident is too many. However, the data I've read seems to indicate that unarmed black deaths by the hands of the police each year is an extremely, extremely low percentage of overall black deaths. Certainly far lower than the current climate would have you believe. So what exactly do we do to fix it? The same people who are saying "Defund the Police" and "F the Police" are the same ones crying for the police when counter-protestors are going after them. That tells me that everyone still wants the police around. Now what?
And on the same token, the anecdote you provided about one video equaling a hundred works in both directions. For every one video that the average citizen sees of some protestor being violent, hurting people, stealing, looting, etc...that citizen will assume 100 more incidents happened just like it. Completely negates the positive message trying to be conveyed.
What do we do as people?
Unfortunately the people with the loudest voices are the ones that want to keep the issue alive for their own gain rather than solve it. US Senator Tim Scott (who is black), Introduced police reform legislation several weeks ago, and instead of sitting down to discuss it, it was immediately dismissed. Why? Politics of course. You don’t really hear a lot of discussion about potential solutions and how to get them implemented. Why is that?we realize the arguments against the police, and against the citizen are valid. the issue is that people are prioritizing the importance of one over the other. because that creates division and division keeps people from realizing the real issue today is the rich vs the rest.
how simple would it be to say both parties are valid lets address it both at the same time. but division is what america was built for.
No, but that "little" comment is why we can't have civil discourse on these issues. We disagree with a viewpoint, and then put down the person as stupid on top of it. It's okay to disagree, but the put downs are what really drive people apart.Is there the need to insult half of America by calling them racists for who they vote for or not disagreeing with a decisive message being peddled?
It was the cat comment that put you over the edge? Lol
we realize the arguments against the police, and against the citizen are valid. the issue is that people are prioritizing the importance of one over the other. because that creates division and division keeps people from realizing the real issue today is the rich vs the rest.
how simple would it be to say both parties are valid lets address it both at the same time. but division is what america was built for.
Again, and this is just my opinion, I think most parties do say that and do feel that way. I think, in my opinion, the media has created an agenda to create the illusion that this isn't true. They show us things to make us think irrationally and force us to pick sides. And unfortunately there are too many idiots that lap it up.
How many times have I actually seen or read of specific, real human beings tell others that if they support police they don't support black lives? Or if you don't take a knee for the flag you don't care about black people? Or if you do take a knee for the flag you are Anti-America? Or if you support BLM you are immediately anti police?
I think your heart is in the right place, as do I think mine is too. Don't let it get twisted that the majority of people's in this country are not. We've let narratives and obfuscation hurt our neighbors, or friendships, made us feel guilty for no reason, and elect our politicians for us. It has to stop. We live on sound bytes and rhetoric now as our mantra.
I value black lives deeply, as I do all others as well. I also value police officers and our government and the difficulties and stresses that both face. What I don't value is fascism and socialism, and there's too much of both going around lately. Very interesting times when they force you to support both in the name of justice.
If they actually cared a thing for that poor little guy they wouldn't commodify and reduce him to a red herring in an argument that is actually about police brutality and systemic racism and nothing whatsoever to do with his horrendous circumstances. But, you know...Yet again, Conner Hinnant makes an appearance. Last I checked, he wasn’t shot by a police office and the POS is in custody and will likely go away forever with a first degree murder conviction.
Can we stop with the false analogies?
If they actually cared a thing for that poor little guy they wouldn't commodify and reduce him to a red herring in an argument that is actually about police brutality and systemic racism and nothing whatsoever to do with his horrendous circumstances. But, you know...