I've been thinking about this quite a bit, and haven't touched it with a ten foot pole with my more left-leaning friends, or on social media. I'd like to test the waters here, and see what people are thinking.
With the death of the young lady (from all accounts a peaceful activist), it is a terrible tragedy -- and an ugly incident prior to the car driving into the counter protesters.
The questions I have:
Is hate speech protected speech? Apparently the white nationalist group held a rally the night before, which went unopposed, and there were no issues, other than the disgusting sight of a gathering of racists.
Should we continue removing/destroying monuments to the past, even if it was a regrettable part of our nation's history? If I have a sliver of common ground with the group protesting the removal of the Robert E. Lee monument, it is there -- though purely for historical reasons. Erasing/editing history is extremely dangerous.
Whom can we trust to report the news? Most of the MSM labels this as neo-Nazi violence, without any mention of the makeup of the counter-protesters, and any ideological, violent tendencies they may have had; the protesters who destroyed the Confederate monument in NC yesterday were painted as peace-loving, anti-racist hippies, rather than reckless defacers of public property.
Meanwhile, some credible conservative publications raised some questions, many fair, but were treated as apologists to suggest that there may have been more than one group to blame for the violence in Charlottesville. A NYT reporter tweeted something to that effect, and was shouted down, and forced to backpedal.
No matter what your leaning, there is a news outlet for you, and they all tell very different stories. Scary, scary times.
With the death of the young lady (from all accounts a peaceful activist), it is a terrible tragedy -- and an ugly incident prior to the car driving into the counter protesters.
The questions I have:
Is hate speech protected speech? Apparently the white nationalist group held a rally the night before, which went unopposed, and there were no issues, other than the disgusting sight of a gathering of racists.
Should we continue removing/destroying monuments to the past, even if it was a regrettable part of our nation's history? If I have a sliver of common ground with the group protesting the removal of the Robert E. Lee monument, it is there -- though purely for historical reasons. Erasing/editing history is extremely dangerous.
Whom can we trust to report the news? Most of the MSM labels this as neo-Nazi violence, without any mention of the makeup of the counter-protesters, and any ideological, violent tendencies they may have had; the protesters who destroyed the Confederate monument in NC yesterday were painted as peace-loving, anti-racist hippies, rather than reckless defacers of public property.
Meanwhile, some credible conservative publications raised some questions, many fair, but were treated as apologists to suggest that there may have been more than one group to blame for the violence in Charlottesville. A NYT reporter tweeted something to that effect, and was shouted down, and forced to backpedal.
No matter what your leaning, there is a news outlet for you, and they all tell very different stories. Scary, scary times.