All I’m saying is that once we get to the point of being able to do a look back and compare total cases/fatalities against other countries and the measures they took, that’s when you can have a better indication of whether our outcomes would have been materially different. And remember the shelter in place was done to de-stress our healthcare system. If that was not a concern do you think we would have taken the same measures?. And Since you brought up Sweden, I don’t believe there healthcare system lacked capacity even by the steps they took.Sure, lots of variables here but we can start with Sweden. With about 3k deaths to date assuming that 1% number is accurate, the number of cases there is underreported by 1,200%.
They are doing basic social distancing but of that did not bring down the transmission sufficiently enough, cases there will keep growing as will the number of deaths. If they hit 30k, which is Aviv ethe current estimate, but is within the range of potential outcomes, that would represent the same percentage as if the US lost a million lives.
but to have the debate on any of the variables, I’d need to understand what country you think we should compare ourselves to.
Finally, just saw this tonight. Perplexing that 66% of new admissions from NY are those that have sheltered.https://www.cnbc.com/2020/05/06/ny-...hospitalizations-are-people-staying-home.html
Last edited: