ADVERTISEMENT

Potential Sha Replacements

I would say that given the massive rupture in the sport, there isn't much point in comparing them at all. That is the most salient factor when you consider what each one inherited.
The massive rupture should not have impacted our OOC results. The massive rupture shouldn't cause us to lose on our home court by 30 against the 9th place team in the conference. This is a message board that had us finishing 5th-7th in the league when the coaches poll came out. Everyone knew NIL was here. Now it's just an excuse.
 
Except, except you’re leaving out the biggest and most damning component which is NIL and paying players. Willard never had to do that.

I would say Willard had an easier time settling in than Sha will ever have going forward.
Yeah good to think Willards competitors, Boeheim and Calhoun never had players who got paid. LOL
 
  • Like
Reactions: PMB Pirate
The massive rupture should not have impacted our OOC results. The massive rupture shouldn't cause us to lose on our home court by 30 against the 9th place team in the conference. This is a message board that had us finishing 5th-7th in the league when the coaches poll came out. Everyone knew NIL was here. Now it's just an excuse.
Of course it impacted it, and yes, even in the OOC. Because of pay-for-play, we had an entirely new roster this year other than who, Coleman, Tubek, and Addae-Wusu? A roster full of fingers-crossed hopes that these bargain basement finds could turn into something? As it turns out, they aren't great, can't shoot, can't play inside, don't match well together, and might not even be smart enough to learn defensive concepts. So yeah, having that mix of things leveled the competition significant toward the Hofstras and Fordhams, especially when this crew of knuckleheads probably thought they could just show up and beat those teams.

If the head coach was brand new and had no track record, I'd be a lot more concerned about him. But there is context around all of this and not conceding that fact is just stubbornness.
 
OK, I’ll throw some suggestions out

Grant B and Donald Copeland, for obvious reasons. Let’s not forget Level Sanders, too.

Don’t think NBA coaches without college experience work well, but I’ll also toss out Mark Bryant and Adrian Griffin for sake of discussion.

Could go back to Iona pipeline with Tobin Anderson.

Jersey Guy Andy Toole has struggled since Robert Morris changed conferences but perhaps worth a look.
you are making a very strong case for keeping shaheen
 
Of course it impacted it, and yes, even in the OOC. Because of pay-for-play, we had an entirely new roster this year other than who, Coleman, Tubek, and Addae-Wusu? A roster full of fingers-crossed hopes that these bargain basement finds could turn into something? As it turns out, they aren't great, can't shoot, can't play inside, don't match well together, and might not even be smart enough to learn defensive concepts. So yeah, having that mix of things leveled the competition significant toward the Hofstras and Fordhams, especially when this crew of knuckleheads probably thought they could just show up and beat those teams.

If the head coach was brand new and had no track record, I'd be a lot more concerned about him. But there is context around all of this and not conceding that fact is just stubbornness.
Just about every school has about 10 new players. We will have 10 new players again next year, the year after that, and the year after that if the system remains the same. If having new players every year is what keeps us behind we've quite possibly just set up the excuse for the next century.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chickenbox
Just about every school has about 10 new players. We will have 10 new players again next year, the year after that, and the year after that if the system remains the same. If having new players every year is what keeps us behind we've quite possibly just set up the excuse for the next century.
It's no secret that the roster construction this year was a disaster, and a good part of it was because of the coach's choices, electing to spread the meager amount he had across ten guys rather than around two or three guys who were surer bets and let them lead the others. That's not perfect either, but under the new constraints, it's the best bet we have.

We won't need excuses for the next century. Either Seton Hall equips the staff with the money to make the program viable, or it goes away within the next decade. The problem isn't necessarily having ten new players every year; it's having the wrong ten or an ill-fitting ten, or an untalented ten every year. That won't play. But it is the new reality. Enough of them have to come up heads every year or the season's shot. They should at least give the coach a fighting change to pick the right ones.
 
It's no secret that the roster construction this year was a disaster, and a good part of it was because of the coach's choices, electing to spread the meager amount he had across ten guys rather than around two or three guys who were surer bets and let them lead the others. That's not perfect either, but under the new constraints, it's the best bet we have.

We won't need excuses for the next century. Either Seton Hall equips the staff with the money to make the program viable, or it goes away within the next decade. The problem isn't necessarily having ten new players every year; it's having the wrong ten or an ill-fitting ten, or an untalented ten every year. That won't play. But it is the new reality. Enough of them have to come up heads every year or the season's shot. They should at least give the coach a fighting change to pick the right ones.
That’s fine but stop with the 10 new guys problem, no continuity problem because everyone is in the same boat as far as those things go. Poorly constructed roster is the issue, and as far as context and track record what track record does any coach have in getting 10 new guys every year?
 
Yeah good to think Willards competitors, Boeheim and Calhoun never had players who got paid. LOL
No-instead KW got IW’s coach to come and the rest is history. It’s was a brilliant move and worked for him.

But that doesn’t even hold a cup of water now because you have to actually come up with legitimate money to pay players.

Apples and oranges with what each coach had to deal with in their first 3 years—and the foreseeable future.
 
This is a silly thread. Sha is our coach and he's not going anywhere.
Agree for next year. But this response sounds eerily similar to the conventional wisdom [here] before Gonzalez was canned and Willard left for much greener pastures at Maryland.
 
No-instead KW got IW’s coach to come and the rest is history. It’s was a brilliant move and worked for him.

But that doesn’t even hold a cup of water now because you have to actually come up with legitimate money to pay players.

Apples and oranges with what each coach had to deal with in their first 3 years—and the foreseeable future.
Willard did whatever it took to save his job. Sha needs to do the same. Whatever it takes. Find the money. Do something uncomfortable. Anything. This is unsustainable.
 
A local name to keep an eye on moving forward is Dave Klatsky. From Holmdel, played under Dunphy at UPenn, teammate of Matt Langel who gave him a chance at Colgate. Part of the big turnaround there. Wasn't getting any D1 jobs, took the NYU gig (one of the best D3 jobs in the country) and is 39-14 there.

Graduated from the Wharton school, was successful on Wall Street before getting the itch to coach. Very intelligent guy, analytic driven, player friendly. A smart AD from a D1 school will take a chance on him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: da0987 and mbraue
A local name to keep an eye on moving forward is Dave Klatsky. From Holmdel, played under Dunphy at UPenn, teammate of Matt Langel who gave him a chance at Colgate. Part of the big turnaround there. Wasn't getting any D1 jobs, took the NYU gig (one of the best D3 jobs in the country) and is 39-14 there.

Graduated from the Wharton school, was successful on Wall Street before getting the itch to coach. Very intelligent guy, analytic driven, player friendly. A smart AD from a D1 school will take a chance on him.
From the Team Rio stashing Scottie Lewis and Bryan Antoine at Ranney family
 
It's no secret that the roster construction this year was a disaster, and a good part of it was because of the coach's choices, electing to spread the meager amount he had across ten guys rather than around two or three guys who were surer bets and let them lead the others. That's not perfect either, but under the new constraints, it's the best bet we have.

We won't need excuses for the next century. Either Seton Hall equips the staff with the money to make the program viable, or it goes away within the next decade. The problem isn't necessarily having ten new players every year; it's having the wrong ten or an ill-fitting ten, or an untalented ten every year. That won't play. But it is the new reality. Enough of them have to come up heads every year or the season's shot. They should at least give the coach a fighting change to pick the right ones.
Not saying this will happen, but let's look at Missouri. Sha is friends with coach Gates. If I'm not mistaken Missouri won O conference games last season. This season, they are in 4Th in SEC after bringing back a core of that bad team and adding 3 top change agents. Maybe there is lemonade to be made from lemons! It's not impossible, and Sha has too much pride as does the university to not make something similar happen.

Maybe our own uber billionaire grad George Kurtz will give something after all! His net worth now at $7 billion per Forbes, 4x that of Vitamin Water/Pitino water boy!
 
  • Like
Reactions: King of S
Not saying this will happen, but let's look at Missouri. Sha is friends with coach Gates. If I'm not mistaken Missouri won O conference games last season. This season, they are in 4Th in SEC after bringing back a core of that bad team and adding 3 top change agents. Maybe there is lemonade to be made from lemons! It's not impossible, and Sha has too much pride as does the university to not make something similar happen.

Maybe our own uber billionaire grad George Kurtz will give something after all! His net worth now at $7 billion per Forbes, 4x that of Vitamin Water/Pitino water boy!
The only good thing about NIL is you can change the program in one off season. But, even that is not great because one of the best part of being a Seton Hall fan over the years is seeing teams that tool their lumps, stuck together, developed and experienced success.
 
Bottom line is we are not going to get any coach that has a better resume then Sha end of story! Bonus is he also is a SHU person with NJ area roots too!
One could make the argument that a SHU alum may not be the ideal coach. The personal connection between the school and the coach often makes difficult decisions even harder. This happens all the time in the small business world. Employees take advantage of the relationship they have with their employer or vice versa.

As for the NJ ties, I think you are overstating the importance of being from the area. There isn't a single player on the current team from the area and in the world of pay for play, players will travel from anywhere for the right amount of money.
 
I agree. He has this season and two more in my opinion. The program needs an alpha PG and a decent 5 that play big minutes. Keep Middleton for sure. Thats where I'd put the big bucks.
We are a school that cant come up with more than $1.5 million for NIL, you think we are eating any years of a $3 million per year contract?

This just has to stop. Fine, get your frustrations out....believe me we all have them...but come back to reality, and focus on discussion that actually has a chance of happening.
 
From the Team Rio stashing Scottie Lewis and Bryan Antoine at Ranney family
This is spk spreaded embellished story. Dave had no ties to team rio...this is like saying john kennedy current senator from Louisiana is related to rfk jr
 
Last edited:
We are a school that cant come up with more than $1.5 million for NIL, you think we are eating any years of a $3 million per year contract?

This just has to stop. Fine, get your frustrations out....believe me we all have them...but come back to reality, and focus on discussion that actually has a chance of happening.
?? I did not say anything about Sha being replaced. So maybe you are confusing my comments with someone else??

I did say and I"ll stick by it, that I would let anyone on the roster go and in order to bring back an upper tier PG. So, if that means $800,000 or more they should do it. Really they have to do it. Those empty seats vs Butler are the biggest Red Flag to date.
 
Last edited:
Many will argue "it's different," and it is, but I keep thinking of Jeff Ruland at Iona in late 90's - early/mid 2000s. Like Shaheen, an alumnus of the school; same conference where Holloway achieved deserved recognition. Three NCAA trips in nine years from a one-bid league.
In 2005-2006 Iona is 23-8 and is a #13 seed in the tournament. Next year with first eight players from previous team leaving or out for season, he goes 2-28. He's gone.
Ironically, he is replaced by our own Kevin Willard and Shaheen.
 
112 posts and only one of them is suggesting names for a different coach and they are LAUGHABLE. more old seton hall players with vastly worse resumes.

the nail is in the coffin
 
To be clear: you said JFK and have since edited the post to say otherwise.
No that is not true. I referenced john kennedy not jfk. John kennedy as in the current senator from louisiana not jfk the president who was assisinated in Texas. You are just creating mis and dis information in attempt to discredit me on this thread...go suck on a lemon
 
Bottom line is we are not going to get any coach that has a better resume then Sha end of story! Bonus is he also is a SHU person with NJ area roots too!


I think you'd be surprised. As far as being from NJ, what good is that doing us? We don't have one guy on the roster from NJ.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT